Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Breaking: Alex Cobb TRADED to Angels for Jahmai Jones


jordan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lazorko Saves said:

That's a weird misspelling of Teheran.

Teheran fell off. So did Weaver eventually. Maybe it's Cobb's turn. The statement remains true, though, regardless whether you like it or not.

Would you rather a guy like Archer with good peripherals who never seems to actually get results consistent with them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, angelsnationtalk said:

The only reason I said "aside from Teheran" is cuz the boneheads on AW went all snowflakey in the beginning of year trying to justify the only reason why the Angels had the second worst ERA was because of Teheran. 

Man, I typically have a really good memory for stupid comments.  I'm going to have to assume this was said in a thread I didn't read because I just can't see it happening.  There are too many stats juinkies here for people to have not called that out.   What has been pointed out by @Dochalowas this...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

Would you rather a guy like Archer with good peripherals who never seems to actually get results consistent with them?

Nah, I kind of like the Cobb deal.  Just poking on the FIP thing.  I can't see Cobb turning into another disaster like Julio did.

I do agree with your point about our rotation not really being all that bad, we just need to lift the floor and we're already better.

Edited by Lazorko Saves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lazorko Saves said:

Nah, I kind of like the Cobb deal.  Just poking on the FIP thing.  I can't see Cobb turning into another disaster like Julio did.

I do agree with your point about our rotation not really being all that bad, we just need to lift the floor and we're already better.

I mean, it is probably the riskiest of our SP's and could easily go south like Teheran. Wasn't JT's velocity going south too, though?

The real question is whether or not Minasian has a good eye for pitching. If he does, we could end up sneaky good. If not, it'll be Eppler all over again. It's really hard to judge the pitching acquisitions until we see results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That deferred money *HAS* to coming from Baltimore, doesn't it?  It's deferred from previous seasons.

There is zero chance we are the hook for that, otherwise this beyond Tony Reagins-bad territory.  $20.25 mil plus what we pay him for 2021?  No way that's what we just traded for.

Edited by Lazorko Saves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Second Base said:

Ok, so if Cobb does have a Bundy type of leap in performance, can anyone spot it? 

With Bundy, it was almost immediate. People started posting that if he used his for seamer less and started using his slider and cutter more, that he would be really good. Bundy does just that and is in fact, really good. 

So does Cobb have a simple adjustment like that, that he needs to make? Or is he just sort of who he is at this point?

Surely, getting out of the AL East and in front of a good infield defense isn't going to make THAT drastic of a difference, will it?

The Athletic Orioles beat guy: 

"The only question was whether the oft-injured Cobb could stay healthy, but he had made 29 starts in 2017 and was only 30. Obviously, he didn’t stay healthy, has made just 41 starts in three seasons with a 7-22 record and 5.10 ERA. He made 10 starts in a truncated season last year, going 2-5 with a 4.30 ERA."

If last year was closer to normal for him, shaving of even a small bit from that 4.30 by leaving the East could be a solid enough pitcher. Small sample, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, @Second Base, you might like this. From the same article:

"It’s more conceptual than statistical. Cobb’s a legitimate veteran leader. He learned from pitchers such as James Shields and David Price when he was in Tampa and took that role seriously. Some pitchers are labeled as “leaders,” but really aren’t. Cobb, however, loved talking pitching and gave the young guys all the time they needed."

He also notes putting up a 4.30 in the AL East isn't easy. And, I would add, he didn't get the benefit of pitching to the Orioles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

The Athletic Orioles beat guy: 

"The only question was whether the oft-injured Cobb could stay healthy, but he had made 29 starts in 2017 and was only 30. Obviously, he didn’t stay healthy, has made just 41 starts in three seasons with a 7-22 record and 5.10 ERA. He made 10 starts in a truncated season last year, going 2-5 with a 4.30 ERA."

If last year was closer to normal for him, shaving of even a small bit from that 4.30 by leaving the East could be a solid enough pitcher. Small sample, though.

Leaving the AL East and getting in front of a better defense might put his ERA closer to 4.00. If Mickey Callaway has as big of an impact as he had on Everyone last year, he might even drop into the three's if we're lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pancake Bear said:

Also, @Second Base, you might like this. From the same article:

"It’s more conceptual than statistical. Cobb’s a legitimate veteran leader. He learned from pitchers such as James Shields and David Price when he was in Tampa and took that role seriously. Some pitchers are labeled as “leaders,” but really aren’t. Cobb, however, loved talking pitching and gave the young guys all the time they needed."

He also notes putting up a 4.30 in the AL East isn't easy. And, I would add, he didn't get the benefit of pitching to the Orioles. 

All very encouraging. I'm starting to like the acquisition more, just not the price they paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

Also, @Second Base, you might like this. From the same article:

"It’s more conceptual than statistical. Cobb’s a legitimate veteran leader. He learned from pitchers such as James Shields and David Price when he was in Tampa and took that role seriously. Some pitchers are labeled as “leaders,” but really aren’t. Cobb, however, loved talking pitching and gave the young guys all the time they needed."

He also notes putting up a 4.30 in the AL East isn't easy. And, I would add, he didn't get the benefit of pitching to the Orioles. 

So a good clubhouse guy, there’s a shock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

 

If we end up being on the hook for only 4-5mil of his final year, that's pretty solid IMO.  

The Orioles get a prospect back and find someone to absorb ~1/3 of his salary.  For a team who is not contending at all, getting a prospect back and shedding 5mil (or whatever) of payroll for a guy you are not going to have beyond this year does hold value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

Also, @Second Base, you might like this. From the same article:

"It’s more conceptual than statistical. Cobb’s a legitimate veteran leader. He learned from pitchers such as James Shields and David Price when he was in Tampa and took that role seriously. Some pitchers are labeled as “leaders,” but really aren’t. Cobb, however, loved talking pitching and gave the young guys all the time they needed."

He also notes putting up a 4.30 in the AL East isn't easy. And, I would add, he didn't get the benefit of pitching to the Orioles. 

This speaks to Minasians statements about a players fit in the clubhouse being a big factor for him.  Perhaps he was looking for a veteran who would be more helpful to mentor the younger arms coming up.  It makes some sense to explain why he chose Cobb over some of those cheaper, no trade piece required FAs may have penciled in equal or better stats.  Im on board  as long as he isnt done with the starting rotation and improves the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

I agree. Which is why I don't think this is a bad trade. 

I'm not HAPPY with it, but like someone else said, it raises our floor. 

Look at the stats @Inside Pitch posted.

I hate this addition, mostly because I think they could have done it for cheaper but he helps raise the floor some..   At this point it seems Perry's focus is to add as many redundancies as possible in hopes of avoiding a potential black hole.   You gotta figure RF is next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

 

That's fine, it's the deferred money owed that I'm concerned about. 7.5 million in 2022, 4.5 million in 2023 and 2024, and 4.75 million in 2025. 

If the Angels are giving up Jahmai Jones they shouldn't be in the hook for ANY of that, but from previous reports, they are, which would make this an absolutely atrocious trade by any measure. Even if they think Cobb would rebound a bit, to owe him future money is not a good idea at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

Also, @Second Base, you might like this. From the same article:

"It’s more conceptual than statistical. Cobb’s a legitimate veteran leader. He learned from pitchers such as James Shields and David Price when he was in Tampa and took that role seriously. Some pitchers are labeled as “leaders,” but really aren’t. Cobb, however, loved talking pitching and gave the young guys all the time they needed."

He also notes putting up a 4.30 in the AL East isn't easy. And, I would add, he didn't get the benefit of pitching to the Orioles. 

All valid points, the trade isn't as bad as it looks, he's like a pitching coach under the pitching coach, also a pretty reliable starter that should benefit in the AL West.  I think expectations have just be subverted greatly, Bauer is not coming here, it's pretty much a sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Second Base said:

That's fine, it's the deferred money owed that I'm concerned about. 7.5 million in 2022, 4.5 million in 2023 and 2024, and 4.75 million in 2025. 

If the Angels are giving up Jahmai Jones they shouldn't be in the hook for ANY of that, but from previous reports, they are, which would make this an absolutely atrocious trade by any measure. Even if they think Cobb would rebound a bit, to owe him future money is not a good idea at all.

I don’t think you should be concerned with that.  There is no way Arte will take on any deferred money unless the cost to this years team is zero dollars.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Inside Pitch said:

I hate this addition, mostly because I think they could have done it for cheaper but he helps raise the floor some..   At this point it seems Perry's focus is to add as many redundancies as possible in hopes of avoiding a potential black hole.   You gotta figure RF is next.

No 2 additions to bullpen, Petit and Jose Alvarez would be my picks. RF Goodwin back would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...