Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Holy Hell, Trevor Bauer 2.0!


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Bauer has been cleared legally, but not "court of social justice"

If they bring him back, they risk the muppet backlash. But they have no "legal" reason not to. Even if they cut him they have to pay him, a la josh hamilton.

If I remember correctly, Hamilton was the victim in that trail at the court of social justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

It means the cops wrote it up, and submitted it to the DA to file, and the DA declined to do so. (Somewhere back in the beginning of this thread I said it would happen).

Its very common. "Insufficient evidence".

Insufficient evidence does not mean innocent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stormngt said:

Insufficient evidence does not mean innocent

No, it doesnt.

But accused doenst mean guilty either.

Literally any one of us can accuse any other of us of anything. It doesnt mean its true.

The kicker in this incident was that its hard to proove bauer did anything criminal when he had proof of this woman saying "that was great, lets do it again"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taylor said:

Yes it does, if you're white.

 

 

 

And rich.

A poor black/brown/yellow/green man would have had this same outcome.

 

There is no way in hell charges were going to get filed in this case. Nor should there have been, at least with what has been reported. 

Not to mention this was sent to the Los Angeles DAs office..... the LA DA is not filing on plenty of poor dark skinned men these days.

Gascon isnt even filing gang enhancements on shootings..... but he should file at best misdemeanor assault?.... for a victim who said she enjoyed it, went back for seconds?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

A poor black/brown/yellow/green man would have had this same outcome.

 

There is no way in hell charges were going to get filed in this case. Nor should there have been, at least with what has been reported. 

Not to mention this was sent to the Los Angeles DAs office..... the LA DA is not filing on plenty of poor dark skinned men these days.

Gascon isnt even filing gang enhancements on shootings..... but he should file at best misdemeanor assault?.... for a victim who said she enjoyed it, went back for seconds?

 

I'm now picturing a literal green man being on trial. Or maybe a blue man.

blue man michael GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

No, it doesnt.

But accused doenst mean guilty either.

Literally any one of us can accuse any other of us of anything. It doesnt mean its true.

The kicker in this incident was that its hard to proove bauer did anything criminal when he had proof of this woman saying "that was great, lets do it again"

 

No argument from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...