Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Pujols has been terrible


Recommended Posts

I know you guys are going to say water is wet, we know Pujols sucks, etc. But every playoff team midway through the season fixed all their holes to ensure they had 2-3 WAR players at every position. Carter/Holliday weren't doing it so the Yankees got Frazier, put Hicks full time. Brantley/Zimmer got hurt so the Indians got Bruce, moved Kipnis. Red Sox got Nunez when Lin/Sandoval continued sucking. Dodgers put Barnes full time, dropped Agone for Bellinger. Astros got rid of Aoki to put Gonzalez full time, acquired Maybin who played a key role for them.

Teams can no longer carry any average players as starters, let alone guys who are negative WAR. They would instantly be replaced like Carter, Aoki, Sandoval. Especially if they also offered no defensive versatility. Pujols didn't cost us just -2WAR, b/c a +2WAR player is just "an ok starter" and easy to find like Adams/Duda (teams are just giving them away) so it's actualy more like a 4 WAR swing. The Rays would have probably given Morrison away at the deadline too like Bruce/Frazier.

I know WAR isn't exactly added to the wins total but it's amazing, we finished behind the Twins and Pujols was still hitting 4th. Currently we ARE a top 5 AL team, I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect a resolution to this at latest midseason if he continues putting up even a 0/1 WAR DH. No other team would even carry that type of player, let alone treat him the way we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, arch stanton said:

Thanks for the fresh take. It had been at least 3 hours since the last “Pujols sucks” post

LOL, some lurker is probably laughing at them though, you can literally read the entire thread from page 1 and be laughing your butt off... pujols still sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, IheartLA said:

I know you guys are going to say water is wet, we know Pujols sucks, etc. But every playoff team midway through the season fixed all their holes to ensure they had 2-3 WAR players at every position. Carter/Holliday weren't doing it so the Yankees got Frazier, put Hicks full time. Brantley/Zimmer got hurt so the Indians got Bruce, moved Kipnis. Red Sox got Nunez when Lin/Sandoval continued sucking. Dodgers put Barnes full time, dropped Agone for Bellinger. Astros got rid of Aoki to put Gonzalez full time, acquired Maybin who played a key role for them.

Teams can no longer carry any average players as starters, let alone guys who are negative WAR. They would instantly be replaced like Carter, Aoki, Sandoval. Especially if they also offered no defensive versatility. Pujols didn't cost us just -2WAR, b/c a +2WAR player is just "an ok starter" and easy to find like Adams/Duda (teams are just giving them away) so it's actualy more like a 4 WAR swing. The Rays would have probably given Morrison away at the deadline too like Bruce/Frazier.

I know WAR isn't exactly added to the wins total but it's amazing, we finished behind the Twins and Pujols was still hitting 4th. Currently we ARE a top 5 AL team, I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect a resolution to this at latest midseason if he continues putting up even a 0/1 WAR DH. No other team would even carry that type of player, let alone treat him the way we did.

While I agree with what you are saying, the "bright side" to the situation is at DH, Pujols' negative value is a bit more mitigated.  A DH has the least impact on the team, so if there's a spot to get less value from as compared to all the other positions, it would be DH.

That said, flexing Pujols out to 1B is somewhat concerning to me, especially if he ends up resembling a statue out there.  That's why though I am expecting him to be out there no more than 25-30 games, not the 50 games that others are guessing.  I also think you see Pujols on the bench more to "rest" as compared to previous seasons.  We are a deep team now, so giving Pujols 2 days off per week seems like a reasonable thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, IheartLA said:

I know WAR isn't exactly added to the wins total but it's amazing, we finished behind the Twins and Pujols was still hitting 4th. Currently we ARE a top 5 AL team, I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect a resolution to this at latest midseason if he continues putting up even a 0/1 WAR DH. No other team would even carry that type of player, let alone treat him the way we did.

Yep, last year the angels put milestones above winning.  No other team in baseball that is so close to making the playoffs would have started Pujols despite being the worst player in the league.   If Pujols sucks again they better bench his ass sooner rather than later.  I've said it before but the angels don't owe him anything.  Most of those milestones were with the cardinals and he hasn't earned a dollar of his contract with the angels.

If Pujols comes into spring training looking like he's 9 months pregnant again, the angels should just bench him.  There's no reason to keep pandering to this guy.  It's time to put winning above Pujols.  This shit would never happen in NY or Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ten games into the season and Pujols is once again our worst player. The man is negative war already and the only hitter with 10+ PA to be negative. He is second on the team in PA, this is sad and needs to stop.

And for those of you that want to take away the DH defense penalty he's:

negative offense runs above average (which doesn't factor in position)

- below 100 wrc+ 

- OBP below .300

- SLG below .400

- negative BsR

- is walking less than 5% of his PA

- negative UZR first base defense

and some posters on here think he's been performing well so far... :crying-fountain:

When does this nightmare end?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JarsOfClay said:

He's usually a slow starter though. Id give him till May to turn it around. If he doesn't its time to get rid of him.

I believe there are 112,333,332 reasons he'll be batting clean up four more years...called dollars...unless Artie wants to pay him off to leave and face humiliation of cutting a 1st ballot Hall of Famer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...