Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2021-22 CBA Negotiation/Lockout Thread (DEAL IS AGREED TO)


mmc

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Hubs said:

I don't understand why they can't sit down like adults and negotiate.

Owners: We want additional playoffs. More games and More teams.

Players: OK, have you considered adding two teams so there are more jobs for us? Plus expansion fees it would help with revenue "losses" from 2021.

Owners: Ok good point. If we add two teams will you agree to a salary cap?

Players: No, but we would consider a modified luxury tax if it came with a floor threshold. Two tiers each.

Owners: Ok, how about a $200 Million dollar luxury tax and a $75M floor.

Players: How about $250 and $125. 

Owners: Let's meet in the middle at $225 and $100 but a soft cap, with penalties on both sides.

Players: Ok, well, if you factor in adjustments based on media contracts, average ticket price, and attendance numbers, unless you want to open your books further? And will the penalties be distributed to the players?

Owners: Hell no we're not opening our books, ok we agree on adjustments on those three factors. 

Players: Only increases though, no reduction, but we'll give you a pandemic clause. And the Penalty Money?

Owners: Ok, that works for us. Penalty money distributed equally across all non-tax paying teams.

Players: And it's spent on the following years players salaries?

Owners: Uh, no, how about 1/2.

Players: 2/3. 

Owners: Ok. Can we get 4 extra playoff teams then?

Players: Sure, if you lower arbitration to second year. And free agency to year 5.

Owners: How about in the third year, regardless of service time, and in the sixth season, regardless of service time. September callups excluded.

Players: Or at age 28. Whichever is sooner.

Owners: At 30.

Players: We can agree on 29. But we want free agency after 5 full years, or sixth year of service.

Owners: If you'll limit contracts to 6 free agent years. And agree to arbitration based on WAR.

Players: 7 free agent years, and we get universal DH.

Owners: Done. But we need an updated cheating policy and updated domestic violence policy.

Players: Only if more additional playoff revenue comes to players. And a cut of merchandising revenue.

Owners: We'll give you 1/3 of the extra money for Playoffs, if you agree to the arbitration changes.

Players: Well, 1/2 only if the WAR number for arbitration is calculated based on average player salary plus 25%. And players get a bigger cut of their jersey and memorabilia sales. 

Owners: We can live with that. If you let us sell advertising on uniforms and broadcast more games on MLB and streaming platforms. And gambling revenue. 

Players: We can do that too. Assuming we get a cut of new streaming revenue, and uniform advertising revenue.

Owners: Ok, great. We'll draw up the new CBA and get it to you for review next week.

Players: Great.

 

 

 

 

The two sides aren't individuals but conglomerates that have disparate priorities and imperatives within their members.  Add the pressure of the fact that each negotiation sets precedence for subsequent negotiations and you have drama that drags out until both parties suffer more from the delay than by compromise.   It is typical for most collective bargaining settings.  Some are more comfortable with brinksmanship than others.

Edited by Junkballer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...