Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Cleveland Indians changing their team name


mmc

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Was wondering about this the other day, when this thread started. Specific to the term braves.

Is that an actual native word? Or an english translated one?

I remember Native American protests when the Braves played in the World Series at Minnesota in 1991. There were reports of Atlanta fans being accosted outside the Metrodome. When they painted the logos on the field, they omitted the tomahawk under the Braves script. To give the illusion of being even handed, they omitted the underline in the Twins logo, but it was clear what was going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

One thing that I find offensive (and not just because I went to the University of Florida) is the Florida State war chant. A stadium full of white people waving arms simulating the swinging of a tomahawk while singing a faux-Indian chant (which unfortunately FSU alumnus Deion Sanders also brought to Atlanta as the tomahawk chop). Then there is the spectacle of a white guy in war paint riding a horse onto the field and sticking a flaming spear into it. Culture appropriation, pure and simple.

I can see your point if the action is offensive in and of itself. But if white people are reenacting a native ritual out of respect, then it should not be offensive. As to your example, I dont know how native people feel but would respect their opinion. I guess both sides should respect the intent and context of a given action.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ukyah said:

i'm fairly in the middle when it comes to a lot of this stuff, but this is a weird statement to make unless you're talking about the most generic of names. i think the peoples of these first nations definitely have the right to claim ownership over their names.

even braves makes sense because it's not really a generic term. as far as i'm aware there are no other people other than the native americans that used that term, whichever tribes that may have been specifically.

Yes, I agree. You should not name a team the Cherokees, for example. I was referring to words/names like Braves or warriors etc... These are names of respect, at least how I envision them. Redskins, however, is offensive as it reduces a people to their skin color.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mark PT said:

I can see your point if the action is offensive in and of itself. But if white people are reenacting a native ritual out of respect, then it should not be offensive. As to your example, I dont know how native people feel but would respect their opinion. I guess both sides should respect the intent and context of a given action.  

Mocking swinging a tomahawk is not recreating any ritual, and it certainly doesn't seem respectful.

At one point in their history, the Braves used the slogan "Scalp 'em, Braves". They dropped it, along with the Indian who used to come out of a "teepee" behind the left field wall and dance whenever they hit a home run. I read a story about "Chief Nocahoma" after he left, and he got a lot of grief from Native Americans for playing into stereotypes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Angelsjunky said:

So what does that matter? It is a word that refers to Native Americans, so it makes sense that they have a voice in its usage.

But...

In this case, if its an English word, and isnt derogatory.... is it offensive? And if so, why?

Im not saying youre doing this, AJ, but the idea this group of people isnt allowed to acknowledge this group of people, because they arent them, is silly. 

One of the most popular teams in Japan is called The Marines. Should Marines be offended? The Japanese and the Marine Corps obviously have a history.... but the Japanese obviously chose the name out of respect for them, not to mock Marines. Now imagine if it was whatever the Japanese word for Marine is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mark PT said:

Yes, I agree. You should not name a team the Cherokees, for example. I was referring to words/names like Braves or warriors etc... These are names of respect, at least how I envision them. Redskins, however, is offensive as it reduces a people to their skin color.

i don't disagree with any of that. warriors is different from braves, being that it's not specifically relating to native americans. warriors is a common term. braves is an interesting case subject because it's not a native american word, but it's relating some version of bravo to young indian males with a very clear emphasis on the root origin which is, savage.

i don't find brave offensive, because it's been adopted by native tribes, but if a native expressed to me that origin of the word  and called it offensive. it's certainly not hard to understand that viewpoint.

full disclosure, my oldest daughter is shoshone indian. i have spent plenty of time on the res to have a somewhat informed opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ukyah said:

i don't disagree with any of that. warriors is different from braves, being that it's not specifically relating to native americans. warriors is a common term. braves is an interesting case subject because it's not a native american word, but it's relating some version of bravo to young indian males with a very clear emphasis on the root origin which is, savage.

i don't find brave offensive, because it's been adopted by native tribes, but if a native expressed to me that origin of the word  and called it offensive. it's certainly not hard to understand that viewpoint.

full disclosure, my oldest daughter is shoshone indian. i have spent plenty of time on the res to have a somewhat informed opinion.

Wind River?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mark PT said:

Yes, I agree. You should not name a team the Cherokees, for example. I was referring to words/names like Braves or warriors etc... These are names of respect, at least how I envision them. Redskins, however, is offensive as it reduces a people to their skin color.

Just off the top of my head, colleges and universities that might be affected by this if it were to proceed to its conclusion:

Florida State - Seminoles

Central Michigan - Chippewas

Illinois - Illini

Utah - Utes

North Dakota - Fighting Sioux

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cosmo_Kramer said:

Wind River?

la jolla indian reservation.

it's not in la jolla san diego.

which gives some more insight into colonial oppression. the la jolla reservation is luiseno indians, but they grouped shoshone into the same band because, you know, what's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ukyah said:

la jolla indian reservation.

it's not in la jolla san diego.

which gives some more insight into colonial oppression. the la jolla reservation is luiseno indians, but they grouped shoshone into the same band because, you know, what's the difference?

Interesting. And the wind river reservation is eastern shoshone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tank said:

So what happened to “sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me”?

The contemporary saying would go something like this:

”Sticks and stones can break my bones but more importantly I must find a way to view as many words as possible to be offensive to me as it proves I care, proves I am enlightened, and allows me to feel superior to others (the irony) as I grandstand and explain to others why they also should be offended.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

Just off the top of my head, colleges and universities that might be affected by this if it were to proceed to its conclusion:

Florida State - Seminoles

Central Michigan - Chippewas

Illinois - Illini

Utah - Utes

North Dakota - Fighting Sioux

 

Florida State, Utah, and Central Michigan have working partnerships with their local Native American tribes. UND has been the Fighting Hawks for a couple of years now. Illinois retired their Native American mascot in favor of a block "I" and are working on a new mascot (the belted kingfisher). Many of these names have been changed, and are continuing to change. That's the right thing to do. Native American people are not anyone's mascots. Reducing real people to these ridiculous stereotypes (faux native American chants, showing up in redface and fake headdresses, cheering with phony and stereotypical ephemera like drums and tomahawks) isn't honoring anyone. It would be completely unacceptable if it were directed at African- or Asian-Americans. Somehow it's cool to do that to Native Americans.  Sorry, @Vegas Halo Fan.That isn't directed at you.

FTR, I'm hoping they change it to "Spiders."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is dumb.

got changing "Redskins" (although it was one of the best team names in sports), but this is setting a really gay precedent. 

List every name for every sports team and I guarantee you there's a group of people who find it offensive. And I also guarantee you they'll be white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

This is dumb.

got changing "Redskins" (although it was one of the best team names in sports), but this is setting a really gay precedent. 

List every name for every sports team and I guarantee you there's a group of people who find it offensive. And I also guarantee you they'll be white.

You're right. It's just white people.  "Ending the Era of Harmful "Indian" Mascots. https://www.ncai.org/proudtobe

I know you like to joke, but you've also said some of the most insightful stuff in the politics thread. You're better than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremiah said:

You're right. It's just white people.  "Ending the Era of Harmful "Indian" Mascots. https://www.ncai.org/proudtobe

I know you like to joke, but you've also said some of the most insightful stuff in the politics thread. You're better than this.

I mean, it pretty much is the white people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of you, classic attacking of the messenger rather than addressing the message. And Kevin adds in a strawman about SJW's. The argument has nothing to do with that. Incredibly lazy takes.

So, all of the research studies and articles that can be easily found here (https://www.ncai.org/proudtobe), explaining why these stereotypes are harmful, were written by white people or SJWs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jeremiah said:

Both of you, classic attacking of the messenger rather than addressing the message. And Kevin adds in a strawman about SJW's. The argument has nothing to do with that. Incredibly lazy takes.

So, all of the research studies and articles that can be easily found here (https://www.ncai.org/proudtobe), explaining why these stereotypes are harmful, were written by white people or SJWs?

You'll notice I wasn't exclusively talking about stereotypes regarding Native people. You're reading far more into that comment than is actually there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

But...

In this case, if its an English word, and isnt derogatory.... is it offensive? And if so, why?

Im not saying youre doing this, AJ, but the idea this group of people isnt allowed to acknowledge this group of people, because they arent them, is silly. 

One of the most popular teams in Japan is called The Marines. Should Marines be offended? The Japanese and the Marine Corps obviously have a history.... but the Japanese obviously chose the name out of respect for them, not to mock Marines. Now imagine if it was whatever the Japanese word for Marine is.

No word is inherently offensive - it is just a sound made of letters. Obviously some have pejorative connotations, but "Indians" or "Braves" Isn't inherently insulting ("Redskins" is different, I'd say). But if many, many people whose cultural tradition is referred to by that name want it changed, I don't think it is such a bad thing to change it. And despite what some in this thread have said, it isn't just SJWs. Sure, they're usually loudest and most obnoxious, don't lose the signal for the noise. Native American groups have been trying to get these names changed for decades. 

What is strange to me is how upset people are about this change. Why does it matter? I mean, who cares if a baseball team changes their name? Is this a team name such a sacred thing that changing it is sacrilege?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...