Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Lee Smith and Harold Baines get the hall call


red321

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sam Sanchez said:

Harold Baines (RF) - Career WAR 38.7 over 22 seasons

 

Tim Salmon (RF) - Career WAR 40.6 over 14 seasons

 

 

So, does this mean Salmon has a chance? Ha.

Honestly, if GA had remained healthy I’d say him and Baines end up with incredibly similar numbers. Considering the number of seasons they each played, they’re fairly similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I don't think this belongs in this thread necessarily, but if Baines got in with 37.8 Career WAR in 22 seasons... Trout's a shoo in with 64.3 WAR in 7. LOL.

Also, did you all know that Trout is the Angels Career WAR leader? Already? And that Simmons will be top 20 by this time next year, and top 12 by the end of 2020. If they resigned him for three more seasons after 2020, he'd have a chance to pass Tim Salmon and Jim Fregosi on the Angels Career WAR list?

Crazy to think we're watching two of the best players to ever play for the Angels right now and the second isn't Albert Pujols.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listened to Edgar Martinez interview on MLB radio.

The guy answered every single question about his playing days with some form of being obsessed with his own batting average, winning the batting title and hitting .350.

Not a word about winning or teammates.  Personal batting average.

It was all about his own numbers.

Not sure is remotely aware of how bad that interview sounded. . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand where T.L. is coming from.  He's spent his whole life evaluating talent with his eyes.  A new generation comes along telling him he's been evaluating players and even their careers all wrong... I can see why he'd be defensive.  I can understand his feeling "disrespected."  The folks who understand and rely on analytics are winning the day.  They're taking over.  He feels devalued and his opinion is being marginalized.  He doesn't like the fact that a lot of these analysts have never played baseball or managed baseball at a high level. 

I also understand his frustration with the baseball writers.  They have an interest in the game... but many of them may not "know the game" the way he does. 

At the end of the day, T.L. needs to get over himself a bit.  It's a new day.  There's a new way.  That being said - There is definitely a place for both.  BUT.... both sides have to make room for one another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...