Hillary Hates Taxes and other Hillaryous things

[Glen]

2 hours ago, Jay said:

Funny how the libs are now crying about the constitution, while they usually argue that it is an obsolete piece of paper written by rich old white men and should be discarded.

Therefore it comes as no surprise that few have more blatant disregard for the constitution than Obama who believes the president should have omnipotent power to dictate as he sees fit.

 

 

Did you find any proof of any libs arguing about how the constitution should be discarded, or is that just a figment of your imagination?

[red321]

3 hours ago, Jay said:

Funny how the libs are now crying about the constitution, while they usually argue that it is an obsolete piece of paper written by rich old white men and should be discarded.

Therefore it comes as no surprise that few have more blatant disregard for the constitution than Obama who believes the president should have omnipotent power to dictate as he sees fit.

 

 

 

I'll take things that nobody has said for $1600 Alex.

 

Statements like yours are a special kind of stupid. I find it precious that at some point folks on the right decided that because they couldn't convince a majority of people their positions were the right course for the country they just decided that anything they didn't like was unconstitutional. Just because you carry a small pocket constitution in your pocket doesn't mean your interpretation is correct.

 

[nate]

Plus Republicans love to piss all over the constitution.  For example...

Quote

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

 

[Stradling]

Second Amendment 

 

(3....2.....1...)

[Jason]

That is why both parties suck. They will disregard the constitution to satisfy their own personal beliefs.

[mtangelsfan]

14 minutes ago, nate said:

Plus Republicans love to piss all over the constitution.  For example...

 

 

 

Classic.  You don't want the first part, but you sure and the hell want the second.

Quote

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

 

[nate]

I have no problem with free exercise of religion.

[mtangelsfan]

That isn't what you have expressed in the past.

[Glen]

Free exercise of religion doesn't mean favoring one religion over another nor does it mean basing laws on one set of (or any) religious beliefs.

[mtangelsfan]

It also doesn't mean the government gets to order folks of a different faith not to follow that faith.

[nate]

1 minute ago, mtangelsfan said:

It also doesn't mean the government gets to order folks of a different faith not to follow that faith.

You mean like polygamy?

That is the only thing I can think of when the government has done that.

[Lhalo]

Just now, nate said:

You mean like polygamy?

I think polygamy is more of a morality issue than a religious issue.

[mtangelsfan]

You must make that cake.  You must sell that drug.  

coming soon, you  must perform that ceremony.  Already Christians can't voice support for a candidate during church service.  

[Spirit]

10 minutes ago, nate said:

You mean like polygamy?

That is the only thing I can think of when the government has done that.

 

Love is love.

 

 

[red321]

15 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

You must make that cake.  You must sell that drug.  

coming soon, you  must perform that ceremony.  Already Christians can't voice support for a candidate during church service.  

a) that certainly doesn't stop them

2) Sure they can...officially they just don't get to keep their tax exempt status 

c) interestingly enough...that started when they were trying to silence the Black ministers during the Civil Rights movement

y) probably time for that rule to change, or at least be reviewed...in large part just revoke all tax exempt status

 

 

[mtangelsfan]

I don't see how it does.

Also, I would be fine with getting rid of all tax exempt status.

[Glen]

17 minutes ago, Geoff said:

 

Love is love.

 

 

If three or more consenting adults want to get married who am I to stand in the way?

But then I read "Under the Banner of Heaven" and started to think twice, at least as it relates to the Mormon church. Horrible stuff.

[Spirit]

2 minutes ago, Glen said:

If three or more consenting adults want to get married who am I to stand in the way?

But then I read "Under the Banner of Heaven" and started to think twice, at least as it relates to the Mormon church. Horrible stuff.

 

There's horrible examples of one man marrying one woman.  People should be able to do what they want.  There will always be horrible humans out there to cast an ugly shadow on anything. 

 

 

 

[Lhalo]

Why would people want more than one wife? Are they all masochistic?

[Spirit]

Probably.  But who are we to begrudge them their masochism?

 

 

[Blarg]

39 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

You must make that cake.  You must sell that drug.  

coming soon, you  must perform that ceremony.  Already Christians can't voice support for a candidate during church service.  

And yet Unions are free to choose for their members which candidate they will back and send out instructions as to who to vote for.

 

[Tank]

more than one wife equals more than one mother in law.

[Spirit]

Absolutely unbelievable what Hillary said at her press conference today! 

 

 

[the dude abides]

4 minutes ago, Geoff said:

Absolutely unbelievable what Hillary said at her press conference today! 

 

Almost as unbelievable as what was uncovered in Trump's release of his tax returns this morning.

[Thomas]

5 minutes ago, Geoff said:

Absolutely unbelievable what Hillary said at her press conference today!

This looks like clickbait but I can't find the link!