Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

The Official 2017-2018 Hot Stove Thread


greginpsca

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, stormngt said:

How did that strategy work out for us at the turn of the decade?

How did forfeiting our draft picks work out for us? How did signing FAs work out because we wanted to win now? How did signing big time relievers like Madson or Spierer work out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, jordan said:

Elsewhere, what should stand out is the inclusion of Greg Holland. The Angels would consider him at "the right price," according to Morosi. His price must be approaching the "right" range by this point, and the Angels bullpen would look that much better with him in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WeatherWonk said:

Would get us someone as good as Holland? Who is this reliever, and on what team? 

Are you thinking of a trading deadline type move, after we see how our pen is performing?

 

2 hours ago, eaterfan said:

I'm putting together a list. I'm at lunch now so I'll get a better idea soon. But basically there were just over 100 relievers with an ERA+ over 124 (within 15 percent of Holland last season) and at least 30 IPs.

The list is 106 relievers who fit that criteria. Holland is 74th in ERA+, He's 69th in IPs (Nice), 75th in WIP, 68th in K/B

Here's a list of relievers on bad teams who figure not to contend this year and aren't trying (KC, CWS, DET, MIA, ATL, PITT, CIN, or a FA) my list is a little outdated since it is where the player was last year:

Name Age Tm ERA+ IP FIP WHIP ERA
Felipe Rivero* 25 PIT 258 75.1 2.47 0.889 1.67
A.J. Schugel 28 PIT 221 32 4 1.406 1.97
Scott Alexander* 27 KCR 181 69 3.23 1.304 2.48
Raisel Iglesias 27 CIN 177 76 2.7 1.105 2.49
Mike Minor* 29 KCR 176 77.2 2.62 1.017 2.55
Drew Steckenrider 26 MIA 175 34.2 3.1 1.385 2.34
Shane Greene 28 DET 172 67.2 3.84 1.241 2.66
Sam Freeman* 30 ATL 168 60 3.34 1.25 2.55
Arodys Vizcaino 26 ATL 151 57.1 3.72 1.099 2.83
David Hernandez 32 CIN 143 55 2.76 1.036 3.11
Kevin McCarthy 25 KCR 141 45 3.98 1.4 3.2
Greg Infante 29 CHW 138 54.2 3.58 1.189 3.13
Kyle Barraclough 27 MIA 135 66 3.66 1.379 3
Jose Ramirez 27 ATL 134 62 4.88 1.194 3.19
Dillon Gee 31 FA 130 49.1 4.76 1.399 3.47
Peter Moylan 38 KCR 129 59.1 4 1.096 3.49
George Kontos 32 PIT 125 66.1 3.72 1.221 3.39

 

Here's a list of pitchers on teams below .500 last year who may be trying to contend but will probably fall off and make relievers available (TBR, TOR, BAL, SEA, TEX, OAK, NYM, PHI, SDP, SFG):

Name Age Tm ERA+ IP FIP WHIP
Pat Neshek 36 PHI 286 62.1 1.86 0.866
Richard Bleier* 30 BAL 219 63.1 4.37 1.184
Hoby Milner* 26 PHI 212 31.1 4.5 1.468
Cory Gearrin 31 SFG 211 68 3.89 1.25
Brad Hand* 27 SDP 192 79.1 3.03 0.933
Alex Claudio* 25 TEX 188 82.2 3.21 1.04
Anthony Swarzak 31 NYM 187 77.1 2.74 1.034
Dominic Leone 25 TOR 180 70.1 2.94 1.052
Keone Kela 24 TEX 169 38.2 3.26 0.905
Juan Nicasio 30 SEA 167 72.1 2.98 1.078
Tony Zych 26 SEA 161 40.2 3.99 1.254
Luis Garcia 30 PHI 160 71.1 3.12 1.22
Hunter Strickland 28 SFG 159 61.1 3.63 1.435
Tommy Hunter 30 TBR 159 58.2 3.07 0.972
Mychal Givens 27 BAL 158 78.2 3.72 1.042
Zach Britton* 29 BAL 151 37.1 3.4 1.527
Ryan Buchter* 30 OAK 149 65.1 4.54 1.071
Jerry Blevins* 33 NYM 144 49 3.12 1.367
Hector Neris 28 PHI 140 74.2 3.71 1.259
Kyle Crick 24 SFG 138 32.1 3.9 1.206
Brad Brach 31 BAL 137 68 3.58 1.132
Roberto Osuna 22 TOR 137 64 1.74 0.859
Emilio Pagan 26 SEA 133 50.1 3.28 0.934
Nick Vincent 30 SEA 133 64.2 2.82 1.16
Craig Stammen 33 SDP 132 80.1 4.38 1.195
Edwin Diaz 23 SEA 130 66 4.02 1.152
Danny Barnes 27 TOR 130 66 4.58 1.091
Tony Watson* 32 SFG 128 66.2 4.45 1.38
Alex Colome 28 TBR 128 66.2 3.37 1.2
Ryan Tepera 29 TOR 128 77.2 3.75 1.133
Darren O'Day 34 BAL 127 60.1 3.7 1.077
Matt Bush 31 TEX 125 52.1 4 1.452
Dan Jennings* 30 TBR 124 62.2 4.72 1.34

 

Of the 50 guys on either list + Holland, he ranked 31st in ERA+, 50th in ERA, 37th in IPs, 32rd in FIP, 23rd in WHIP, 26th in K/BB, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, VariousCrap said:

 

I think he gets closer to 15 million a year.  I'd offer him that.

Reports are he turned down 3/42 early in the offseason and he probably wishes he hadn't. Lynn got 1/12 so I think Cobb would be willing to take a 3 year deal with the same aav. Maybe have to include an opt out since those are all the rage. Push Shoe to close and the bullpen gets fixed too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen, I'm at the back of the pack, with respect to sabermetrics. And I appreciate your research. And I appreciate a stat that strives to ameliorate league and park factors.

But for a closer, any flavor of ERA doesnt seem that indicative to me. 

I say WHIP it! WHIP it good! Gimme a closer with a WHIP below 1.2 or 1.1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GoodTimesGoneBad said:

Reports are he turned down 3/42 early in the offseason and he probably wishes he hadn't. Lynn got 1/12 so I think Cobb would be willing to take a 3 year deal with the same aav. Maybe have to include an opt out since those are all the rage. Push Shoe to close and the bullpen gets fixed too. 

I like this! Shoe can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GoodTimesGoneBad said:

Reports are he turned down 3/42 early in the offseason and he probably wishes he hadn't. Lynn got 1/12 so I think Cobb would be willing to take a 3 year deal with the same aav. Maybe have to include an opt out since those are all the rage. Push Shoe to close and the bullpen gets fixed too. 

 

Sounds good to me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The years are the most interesting IMO. I believe that brings him through his age 34 season. 

Granted, it was an extension, but you'd think he'd either want to explore free agency at 32 or just wait to get a 10 year deal in 2020.

Maybe there's an opt out, but it's still interesting nonetheless.  

Hell, offer Trout a 7 year, 280 million extension right now. That's 382 million over the next 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/15/2018 at 10:08 AM, SuperTroopers said:

If Holland was as sure of a thing as you describe he is he wouldn’t be available.   I don’t disagree that we need a closer, but to give up a 2nd and a 5th round pick and the money attached to them, thus giving you zero flexibility in the entire draft, plus international money, something that Eppler seems to covet as a means to build the farm, it seems very unlikely.   

https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-qualifying-offer-rules-explained/c-259650658

• A team that neither exceeded the luxury tax in the preceding season nor receives revenue sharing will lose its second-highest selection in the following year's Draft, as well as $500,000 from its international bonus pool for the upcoming signing period. If it signs two such players, it will also forfeit its third-highest remaining pick and an additional $500,000.

For a team to lose both a second and fifth round pick that needed to exceed the luxury tax the year before. IE: Dodgers, Giants, Yankees, Boston, Nationals.

We would lose second round pick and $500,000 in international pool money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...