Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Olney: “Brad Ausmus is in jeopardy of losing his job as manager of the Angels”


mmc

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

There are soooooo many other things that go into evaluating a manager aside from the W/L. Maybe Ausmus isn't liked by the players, maybe he doesn't have the clubhouse, maybe's he's a dick (no, I'm pretty sure he's a dick), maybe he's been a dick to Arte. 

Heck, maybe those of us who have pointed out his in-game managerial decisions were also witnessed by the owner and GM and while Eppler thought he'd be a good fit, maybe after evaluating him a year on the job (Which he wasn't able to do up-close when he was a manager for the Tigers) he realized he's not as good as a manager as he originally thought -- and isn't a good manager long term for this team and the success thereof. 

Bad in-game manager or not and whether he's responsible for the W/L due to all of the injuries, there are a bunch of other things that get noted by upper management that only they know about that leads to these types of decisions. 

Yep maybe. Chuck I get why decisions are made, I grasp leadership and making tough decisions.  As a fan we don’t know if his players dislike him.  As a fan we don’t know how Arte feels about him.   So if he isn’t fired does that mean Arte loves him or the players love him?  No of course not.   You think he sucks and graded him a D, I’d give him a C and an  incomplete.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mulwin444 said:

"Bad season!!!!" so easiest to blame the manager except for the actual reasons why it happened.  It's like when I see "ASSmus is terrible!" or "he's just not good"...how can you tell?  No, seriously, how?  I don't love or hate the guy, I just don't have any way to gauge him as a manager based on what he had to work with to manage.  Then there are people celebrating Maddon potentially coming in....why?  Is he going to magically make the pitching staff stay healthy and pitch better?  Just him?  Because it won't matter who is in the manager's chair if they do not have the players healthy and performing.

Yep. Simple answer to a difficult problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

There are soooooo many other things that go into evaluating a manager aside from the W/L. Maybe Ausmus isn't liked by the players, maybe he doesn't have the clubhouse, maybe's he's a dick (no, I'm pretty sure he's a dick), maybe he's been a dick to Arte. 

or, more importantly, maybe Trout doesn't like him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Stradling said:

I don’t care if Ausmus is retained or not but how do you judge the guy based on this season?  If you don’t like the lack of motion plays like hit and run or stolen bases then you hate virtually all of baseball these days.  Same goes with pitching changes.  Our starters were with shitty, young, or both.   So the quick hook was inevitable.   To judge him on this year would be asinine. 

I would assume Asumus' evaluation is based on more than simply the season.  There could be some internal issues with players/coaches?  I have no idea.  Making game decisions and moves are only a portion of his responsibility.  I think he also needs to be a manager of people, egos and change.   I have no idea but I do agree that firing a manager for one season is strange, unless there are other issues that are not able to be resolved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eligrba said:

I would assume Asumus' evaluation is based on more than simply the season.  There could be some internal issues with players/coaches?  I have no idea.  Making game decisions and moves are only a portion of his responsibility.  I think he also needs to be a manager of people, egos and change.   I have no idea but I do agree that firing a manager for one season is strange, unless there are other issues that are not able to be resolved. 

I agree with all of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think personally I compared him too much to Scioscia, which would be unfair in itself because Mike was a decent manager from the start.

He did seem to be outmanaged by the opponents at times.

I also question his use of Suarez, Barria, and Sandoval.  I just hope they're not ruined for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, m0nkey said:

So now Pujols and Hamilton were Arte’s decision?

That is certainly a narrative that is out there....I don't think we know....You would expect Arte to be involved for that kind of money but we'll probably never know how much was Arte and how much was DiPoto....I'll say this: if he wasn't on board, DiPoto didn't do enough to discourage Arte....I know that is easier said than done but sometimes you have to save a boss from himself....knowing how to manage a difficult boss is crucial....not easy but crucial.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...