Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Angels in discussions with CC Sabathia


KevinJ14

Recommended Posts

Just now, wopphil said:

You guys are crazy. He has averaged 165 innings the last two years with a 116 ERA+. Those numbers, if on the Angels, would have made him hands down the most effective pitcher on the staff. He is likely to command only a one or two year deal, and signing him would allow us to move Skaggs or Heaney for a second or third baseman. 

When you factor in all of our misfortunes he would've been our Ace. It's too bad he had the alcohol issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wopphil said:

You guys are crazy. He has averaged 165 innings the last two years with a 116 ERA+. Those numbers, if on the Angels, would have made him hands down the most effective pitcher on the staff. He is likely to command only a one or two year deal, and signing him would allow us to move Skaggs or Heaney for a second or third baseman. 

This is a much better direction than Darvish  ... doesn’t necessarily have to be CC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wopphil said:

You guys are crazy. He has averaged 165 innings the last two years with a 116 ERA+. Those numbers, if on the Angels, would have made him hands down the most effective pitcher on the staff. He is likely to command only a one or two year deal, and signing him would allow us to move Skaggs or Heaney for a second or third baseman. 

That was what I was thinking.  He is not the dominant CC but with a short contract, he would so much better than most of  the other back of the rotation pitchers being considered.  I can Skaggs being jettisoned before Heaney. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

I think it falls into "hes better than we think, but still not really a good move" territory.

It all depends on what other moves were looking to make. Have to assume one of our pitchers is getting moved for a 2B.

I disagree. If he's cheap, then the move is just fine. Even if he gives us 200 IP and a 4.00 ERA at the back end, I'd take that over what we have now. IMO it all depends on how much mula the man wants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the Halos go to a 6-man rotation(which Eppler heavily implied), Sabathia can slot into the rotation as that steady vet guy among a group of young and uncertain arms. Sure as hell beats the last vet guy they had(Nolasco)

Richards
Sabathia
Ohtani
Skaggs
Shoemaker
Heaney

Bridwell/Barria/Scribner/JC Ramirez as depth

Nice R/L/R/L/R mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...