SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

[angelinkc]

1 minute ago, fishbulb said:

It won't. Read the report.

I doubt it does but never under estimate a good lawyer. 

[angelinkc]

Just now, Randy Gradishar said:

Yeah, 100k deaths shut us all up.

I didnt factor in homicides or anticipate dems initiating corona parties at the nursing homes. 

[angelinkc]

14 minutes ago, Randy Gradishar said:

 

I think it is safe to go to the beach and church. after all it is safe enough to riot.

[Redondo]

Most Laughlin casinos opening today. 

[Brandon]

Hope they don't riot at the Golden Nugget

[gotbeer]

Epidemiologist Who Triggered Worldwide Lockdowns Admits: Without Instituting Full Lockdown, Sweden Essentially Getting Same Effect

[Lhalo]

They chose wisely.

“As well as fewer deaths, Sweden’s GDP actually grew in the first quarter of 2020, suggesting it might avoid the worst of the economic fallout from the crisis.

[Lhalo]

On 5/22/2020 at 1:53 PM, Rico said:

The combo of hydroxychloroquine and antibiotics is especially deadly.  1 in 4 COVID-19 patients in this study died when taking both.

 

 

On 5/22/2020 at 2:11 PM, Rico said:

At this point if a doctor prescribes this to you for COVID-19 it's malpractice.

Turns out the Lancet study that both you and CNN cited is total bullshit and is now being retracted. I’m sure CNN will do a follow up story to straighten everything out.

 

[tdawg87]

Did you know that the principal values of science are based upon changing your thesis (or views) based upon new information? 

Scientists never claim to be the purveyors of "facts". I'm not sure why you are so antagonistic against them. I'd be interested to know why.

[angelinkc]

I have heard quite a few leftist refer to climate change and corona polices as scientific facts. Evolution and carbon dating are two more examples of scientific bs

[Brandon]

I think that's actually what has happened. I'm not going to go through all 399 pages, but there have been a bunch of updates and changes. Even scientists and doctors have mentioned being wrong or adjustments.

[tdawg87]

11 minutes ago, angelinkc said:

I have heard quite a few leftist refer to climate change and corona polices as scientific facts. Evolution and carbon dating are two more examples of scientific bs

Nice one, cals.

[Lhalo]

48 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Did you know that the principal values of science are based upon changing your thesis (or views) based upon new information? 

Scientists never claim to be the purveyors of "facts". I'm not sure why you are so antagonistic against them. I'd be interested to know why.

Did you not read the retraction? The company won’t release the dataset for peer reviewing to be allowed due to client privacy. It’s all nonsense. They posted a study that would be impossible to be peer reviewed and CNN gobbled it up like a cheap whore. 

[Jason]

54 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Did you know that the principal values of science are based upon changing your thesis (or views) based upon new information? 

Scientists never claim to be the purveyors of "facts". I'm not sure why you are so antagonistic against them. I'd be interested to know why.

So we shouldn't automatically consider the prescription of said drugs as malpractice on the doctor?

[tdawg87]

11 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Did you not read the retraction? The company won’t release the dataset for peer reviewing to be allowed due to client privacy. It’s all nonsense. They posted a study that would be impossible to be peer reviewed and CNN gobbled it up like a cheap whore. 

Client privacy is a thing, you know. 

I also said nothing about CNN.

[tdawg87]

7 minutes ago, Jason said:

So we shouldn't automatically consider the prescription of said drugs as malpractice on the doctor?

Uhh no?

[RallyMo]

Nah, this study has been retracted for good reason @tdawg87.

A lot of SCIENTISTS had issues with it once they jumped past the headlines.

Ya know, cause SCIENCE. 

[RallyMo]

14 minutes ago, Jason said:

So we shouldn't automatically consider the prescription of said drugs as malpractice on the doctor?

Were you doing that?

[gotbeer]

26 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Client privacy is a thing, you know. 

I also said nothing about CNN.

It's weird.  Client privacy is a thing.

But if it's about guns, then the left insists that they all have to open up their medical records to background checks.

[Lhalo]

Oh snap!

[tdawg87]

6 minutes ago, gotbeer said:

It's weird.  Client privacy is a thing.

But if it's about guns, then the left insists that they all have to open up their medical records to background checks.

Do they?

I've never said that.

But hey, FACE!

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Lhalo said:

Oh snap!

FACE! Except not!

[angelinkc]

There will be no shortage of science books in hell

[Jason]

1 hour ago, fishbulb said:

Were you doing that?

Rico suggested it

[Jason]

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

Do they?

I've never said that.

But hey, FACE!

Medical records? No. Mental health records? Yes