Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Zack Wheeler signs with the Phillies (5 years, $118 million)


mmc

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sean-Regan said:

None of those are great options. Arte really needs to open his pocketbook. 

Opening your pocketbook doesn't really equal/guarantee great options either.  You try to mitigate potential issues as best you can but there is no guarantees either way.  Do you sign a guy like Bumgarner to a 5 year deal, who has been injured and had declining peripherals, or trade for a 1 or 2 years of Samardzija or Kluber?  Do you commit a 6 or 7 year deal to a 32 year old Strasburg or trade some solid prospects for Ray and try to resign him?

It was always understood that Cole was likely going for 7 years, maybe 8, due to age and recent performance and durability...but he's kind of the 1A option with everyone at varying degrees of questionablility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, True Grich said:

I would of liked to have seen Wheeler sign with the Angels.... but at five years and $118 million... not so much.

I feel like Im gona have to dig up my post from the Grandal thread where I mentioned that we could say "..but at ___ years and ____ million..." for every single signing this offseason.

Will the "but at..." crowd be happy come spring training when our biggest additions are non-roster invitees? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

I feel like Im gona have to dig up my post from the Grandal thread where I mentioned that we could say "..but at ___ years and ____ million..." for every single signing this offseason.

Will the "but at..." crowd be happy come spring training when our biggest additions are non-roster invitees? 

I'm a huge fan of non-roster invitees.  I'm hoping to get my invite this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AngelsLakersFan said:

I feel like Im gona have to dig up my post from the Grandal thread where I mentioned that we could say "..but at ___ years and ____ million..." for every single signing this offseason.

Will the "but at..." crowd be happy come spring training when our biggest additions are non-roster invitees? 

Lol exactly. Why are people so fucking worried about the money? ITS NOT YOURS!!!! We had plenty of money to get Cole and Wheeler at that price. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bronson said:

Lol exactly. Why are people so fucking worried about the money? ITS NOT YOURS!!!! We had plenty of money to get Cole and Wheeler at that price. 
 

 

It's pretty funny. I was in the small minority of not happy about the Pujols deal and almost got ran out of here for bring a Debbie Downer from the not your money crowd. Now it's flipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...