Spin Forum Dumping Bin

[Tank]

LOL. Sure thing, Joe. 

 

 

[Tank]

Okay, who did this. 

[mtangelsfan]

14 minutes ago, Tank said:

LOL. Sure thing, Joe. 

 

 

If only that were true

[Lou]

16 minutes ago, Tank said:

Okay, who did this. 

I know who it wasn't . . . 

 

[St1ck]

18 minutes ago, Tank said:

LOL. Sure thing, Joe. 

 

 

Imagine being able to pick up your cellphone to send out a Tweet like a normal human being. Must feel pretty good. 

[mtangelsfan]

3 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

Imagine being able to pick up your cellphone to send out a Tweet like a normal human being. Must feel pretty good. 

Even if it is a total lie.

the more things change, the more they stay the same

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, Lou said:

I know who it wasn't . . . 

 

Nate?

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

Even if it is a total lie.

the more things change, the more they stay the same

I wish he would have said, "Justice should serve the people, not protect the powerful."

[mtangelsfan]

18 minutes ago, Taylor said:

I wish he would have said, "Justice should serve the people, not protect the powerful."

If he said that he would pretend to care about it.  Powerful people don’t.

[tdawg87]

"Justice serves the people"

[Rico]

 

[Rico]

If this were China the government wouldn't allow their leader to be banned on social media.  

In Trump's case, the free market/capitalism has spoken.

[UndertheHalo]

Oh wow, how brave.  
 

 

[mtangelsfan]

I honestly thought he was dead

[UndertheHalo]

Colin Powell is an unrepentant accessory to mass murder in Iraq.  

[Lou]

3 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I honestly thought he was dead

Ha. So did I. I even checked to make sure. 

Way to take a stand at 83 years old, Colin. 

[Tank]

powell leaving is going to make me re-evaluate everything i believe.

[Tank]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-impeachment-vote-could-come-soon-tuesday-according-senior-democrat?fbclid=IwAR06HB9ZrpiDbi3tEtT5JCZtokVsU0Pe42gQfDU6NefHienRsBkQToTqZFU

other than pelosi being so hateful that this is important to her, can someone explain why they're pursuing this? this could drag on for months for a man slated to leave office in ten days. and it doesn't appear that pence is willing to jump in on this, so impeachment would be the option they'd have to pursue.

at a time when people are suffering and getting very little help from our gov't, punishing trump after he leaves office is nothing but vindictive, especially since it appears they're able to pass a resolution/provision (not sure what it's called) that can prevent him from ever running for office again. if this is to further do damage to his reputation, i don't think that's remotely possible.

[St1ck]

6 hours ago, Tank said:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-impeachment-vote-could-come-soon-tuesday-according-senior-democrat?fbclid=IwAR06HB9ZrpiDbi3tEtT5JCZtokVsU0Pe42gQfDU6NefHienRsBkQToTqZFU

other than pelosi being so hateful that this is important to her, can someone explain why they're pursuing this? this could drag on for months for a man slated to leave office in ten days. and it doesn't appear that pence is willing to jump in on this, so impeachment would be the option they'd have to pursue.

at a time when people are suffering and getting very little help from our gov't, punishing trump after he leaves office is nothing but vindictive, especially since it appears they're able to pass a resolution/provision (not sure what it's called) that can prevent him from ever running for office again. if this is to further do damage to his reputation, i don't think that's remotely possible.

You don't think he's done anything worthy of impeachment this last week?

They also can do more than one thing at a time and there is no way this drags on for months.

[Jason]

 

[Tank]

2 hours ago, st1ckboy said:

You don't think he's done anything worthy of impeachment this last week?

They also can do more than one thing at a time and there is no way this drags on for months.

i didn't say that at all, nor was i trying to imply it. the article details how they would wait until biden's first 100 days are up, then proceed. my question is what would be the value of doing this at that point? he'll be out of office in nine days. will waiting another 3 months make him more out of office? if they find him guilty, censuring is pointless, as is removing him from office. so what's their point? what do they want to accomplish by moving on this? it'll be like the cadaver synod.

[Blarg]

They want to win. 

[St1ck]

2 minutes ago, Tank said:

i didn't say that at all, nor was i trying to imply it. the article details how they would wait until biden's first 100 days are up, then proceed. my question is what would be the value of doing this at that point? he'll be out of office in nine days. will waiting another 3 months make him more out of office? if they find him guilty, censuring is pointless, as is removing him from office. so what's their point? what do they want to accomplish by moving on this? it'll be like the cadaver synod.

Here you go. I'm glad they included his shake down call to the GA SOS.

AP News: Trump faces 'incitement of insurrection' impeachment charge 
https://apnews.com/article/pelosi-house-impeach-trump-575a4070cbef5441d61fb7e4a497f9b7

[Jason]

46 minutes ago, Blarg said:

They want to win. 

Maybe they will be happy with a participation trophy 

[St1ck]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

Maybe they will be happy with a participation trophy 

We all know Trump wasn't.