Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Let us ALL be realistic!


edgur1995

Recommended Posts

Glad to hear you all have such lowered expectations so the gameday thread should be readable again.

Meh...  I think they will be better than people think, I just hope the team doesn't shoot itself in the foot again trying to be a WS contender in January.

 

I like this team, I think if the pitching carries it's own weight they could be very good.  Essentially, last year's plan only better thought out and implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this team has almost no depth if things stay as is.  Sure, the top 5 could end up all panning out and pitching well.  Seems quite the stretch that 3 guys that haven't consistently ever been in a rotation for a full season would all make a full seasons worth of starts. 

 

Currently our depth is Shoemaker, Volstad, Roth, Blanton, and maybe Sappington by mid season.  That seems pretty light.  This team is two starters away from having legitimate depth.  One starter away from having pretty decent depth although not great.  And if everything stays as is, they have very little. 

 

Last year's depth was Williams, Richards, Enright, Roth and Buckner.  Not much different than our current depth if we don't get anyone else.  I know we will, but depending on the quality, we may want to get two. 

 

Still also concerned about the pen.  Yes, they are probably now league average, but I am just not comfortable with that.  I think there is a much better chance that we have a few guys that could step up vs. really not having much talent the last 3 years otherwise. 

 

Still got a fair amount of work to do, but there is still time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real JD is Jon Daniels. the GM that actually runs things in Texas..

 

And he seems to be doing a pretty good job.  Texas has certainly made solid player decisions over the past 5 years, unlike my Angels.  I can't think of a bad trade or signing that Texas has done in that time period.

 

Sometimes you just have to tip your cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And he seems to be doing a pretty good job.  Texas has certainly made solid player decisions over the past 5 years, unlike my Angels.  I can't think of a bad trade or signing that Texas has done in that time period.

 

Sometimes you just have to tip your cap.

 

He keeps bringing back the worse manager in the American League for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He keeps bringing back the worse manager in the American League for one.

 

Who does better than Mensa Mike and his staff.  I understand that Ron Washington is not considered the best manager in the majors, but his team has done much better than the Angels over the past five years.  That has to mean something?  What would be better, a respected manager with an underperforming team or a "bad" manager with a competitve team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And he seems to be doing a pretty good job. Texas has certainly made solid player decisions over the past 5 years, unlike my Angels. I can't think of a bad trade or signing that Texas has done in that time period.

Sometimes you just have to tip your cap.

Not sure I agree. Beltre and Darvish were great moves. But the Andrus deal looks terrible, the Kinsler deal was bad, and I think he overpaid for Choo. Plus, he dealt away a lot of the farm's talent in the Adams and Garza trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still also concerned about the pen.  Yes, they are probably now league average, but I am just not comfortable with that.  I think there is a much better chance that we have a few guys that could step up vs. really not having much talent the last 3 years otherwise. 

 

Still got a fair amount of work to do, but there is still time.

Me too. With Frieri at the top and Jepsen anywhere near, I don't believe we have changed enough, yet. Like you said, there is still time left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I agree. Beltre and Darvish were great moves. But the Andrus deal looks terrible, the Kinsler deal was bad, and I think he overpaid for Choo. Plus, he dealt away a lot of the farm's talent in the Adams and Garza trades.

I agree. He, like most other GM's in his position find themselves needing to make moves out of necessity rather than desire. Some work and some don't. As the years go by and he finds himself with less to work with in the way of a stellar minor league, we'll just see how efficient he is. I saw the Berkman acquisition as the first truly desperate move he's made. Overall I think he has been a good GM for the Rangers. Although, his true test has yet to come. With a thinned out minor league system and an ever increasing payroll, we'll see how he keeps his team in contention?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I agree. Beltre and Darvish were great moves. But the Andrus deal looks terrible, the Kinsler deal was bad, and I think he overpaid for Choo. Plus, he dealt away a lot of the farm's talent in the Adams and Garza trades.

 

Good points.  I forgot about the Garza trade.  The Kinsler trade remains to be seen whether it was good or bad (money not being a consideration), and Choo is an improvement over Cruz, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points.  I forgot about the Garza trade.  The Kinsler trade remains to be seen whether it was good or bad (money not being a consideration), and Choo is an improvement over Cruz, I think.

I think his point on Choo wasn't whether he was better than Cruz, but the fact that they overpaid for him thus utilizing too much remaining salary capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Angels can't sign Tanaka, they have to go for Garza.  Garza is a strong #3 and won't cost a pick.

 

If this teams #3 is Capuano, Hammel or Maholm, this team is in serious trouble.

 

Finally, if the Angels sign Garza, I'd wouldn't mind seeing them sign Maholm or Hammel to add some depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I agree. Beltre and Darvish were great moves. But the Andrus deal looks terrible, the Kinsler deal was bad, and I think he overpaid for Choo. Plus, he dealt away a lot of the farm's talent in the Adams and Garza trades.

15 million for a shortstop who's expected to be a consistent 4-win player isn't terrible by any definition of the word. Andrus is a fairly uncommon case as he was approaching free agency in his mid 20s and the contract is pretty fair to both camps. 

 

Also, the talent Daniels traded for Adams and Garza consisted of potential set-up guys and back-of-the-rotation pitchers and their farm has a surplus of those types.

 

The only move of his that I consider questionable is the Adrian Gonzalez trade at the beginning of his tenure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 million for a shortstop who's expected to be a consistent 4-win player isn't terrible by any definition of the word. Andrus is a fairly uncommon case as he was approaching free agency in his mid 20s and the contract is pretty fair to both camps. 

 

Also, the talent Daniels traded for Adams and Garza consisted of potential set-up guys and back-of-the-rotation pitchers and their farm has a surplus of those types.

 

The only move of his that I consider questionable is the Adrian Gonzalez trade at the beginning of his tenure. 

 

Chris Davis for Uehera could have turned out better.   Mostly I was suprised the Rangers let him leave.  Wasn't Mike Olt part of the Garza trade?  

 

C.J Edwards isn't looking like a back of the rotation or set up guy either...  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=edward000car

Edited by Inside Pitch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will all of these remaining FA pitchers wait until Tanaka is signed? Or will those that decide not to put in a bid, or believe they can't compete with the big dogs regarding his contract, sign the what will be perceived as bargain pitchers like Arroyo, Maholm and Capuano in the meantime before Tanaka is signed?

 

I'm concerned that Jan. 24th is too late and many of these pitchers mentioned above, if not all, will sign with someone else before that date. There is a chance the Angels are left with nothing.

 

That's why we shouldn't wait for the fireworks and act quickly but smartly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Angels can't sign Tanaka, they have to go for Garza.  Garza is a strong #3 and won't cost a pick.

 

If this teams #3 is Capuano, Hammel or Maholm, this team is in serious trouble.

 

Finally, if the Angels sign Garza, I'd wouldn't mind seeing them sign Maholm or Hammel to add some depth.

 

That's a lot of dough your talking about though. What about our bullpen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...