2021-22 CBA Negotiation/Lockout Thread (DEAL IS AGREED TO)

[T.G.]

I've said all I have to say about Scherzer.  I don't really care that much about what people think about him and what his motives might be....

[Taylor]

Again, to some folks nobody is allowed to advocate for people who are less fortunate. If you're considered one of the less fortunate, you're just a lazy, jealous person who needs to work harder. If you're considered one of the "fortunate" people, you need to STFU and count your dollars because you're a hypocrite.

It's ironic, because ultra-wealthy individuals who cheat on their taxes and exploit people to become billionaires are considered American heroes and smart. But ultra-wealthy people who seem to give a damn for anyone but themselves are hypocrites. 

[Lou]

Did someone say Scherzer isn't allowed to advocate on behalf of other players?

[Taylor]

13 minutes ago, Lou said:

Did someone say Scherzer isn't allowed to advocate on behalf of other players?

Yes, that's exactly what I said their argument was.

[Lou]

10 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Yes, that's exactly what I said their argument was.

Who said that? 

[tdawg87]

1 hour ago, Lou said:

Who said that? 

I don't know.

[Lou]

5 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

I don't know.

Third base

[ScottT]

 

[tdawg87]

Lol

[m0nkey]

Someone explain that to me like I’m 5

[Taylor]

2 hours ago, Lou said:

Who said that? 

Good question, Loufetime.

[Lou]

3 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Good question, Loufetime.

Swing and a miss.

Just trying to get things straight as i haven't seen anyone making that statement. 

[ScottT]

[Blarg]

Say goodbye to a resolution before April. 

[Taylor]

36 minutes ago, Lou said:

Swing and a miss.

Just trying to get things straight as i haven't seen anyone making that statement. 

You are correct that no one has literally said that Scherzer shouldn't be allowed to advocate on behalf of other players.

But people on this forum today have called him a hypocrite because he's advocating on behalf of other players. This is in line with a trend I've seen, which I explained in my previous post.

[Lou]

4 minutes ago, Taylor said:

You are correct that no one has literally said that Scherzer shouldn't be allowed to advocate on behalf of other players.

Thank you for answering my question.

[tdawg87]

10 minutes ago, Taylor said:

You are correct that no one has literally said that Scherzer shouldn't be allowed to advocate on behalf of other players.

But people on this forum today have called him a hypocrite because he's advocating on behalf of other players. This is in line with a trend I've seen, which I explained in my previous post.

Crapitalism.

[mtangelsfan]

Is there really a good group and a bad group?  Both have salient and dumb positions.  It is like any disagreement. 

[Angels 1961]

Fans need to unite and boycott games when and if they start by June 1. 

[Stradling]

https://twitter.com/evandrellich/status/1489355453985431559?s=21

[Stradling]

Negotiating 101, don’t negotiate.

[failos]

1 hour ago, ScottT said:

 

Love me some big government.

[beatlesrule]

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, Lou said:

Thank you for answering my question.

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

Is there really a good group and a bad group?  Both have salient and dumb positions.  It is like any disagreement. 

What you're saying is, there are very fine people on both sides.

 

 

 

 

Just busting your chops. In this current MLB dilemma, I don't really have a lot of sympathy for either side.