Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

"The Root of the Angels' Problems..."


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DMVol said:

Good take.....and add to that, for whatever reason or reasons, Reagins decided to basically stat out of the International market for several years....Inexplicable then and now....Good international signings could have, to some extent, covered up poor drafting....

Yeah, that was definitely a missing component as well that thankfully has been re-addressed under Eppler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still dont know how I feel about Dipoto's departure. This is irrespective of his performance.

If Scioscia was resisting the SABR style mantra that Dipoto was probably selling, and if Scioscia was not implementing it (which DID seem to take a while for him to embrace), and Arte backed Scioscia, then I think I would have quit, too. It would be frustrating to try and change the whole strategy of the organization and have it be ignored by the field manager.

Scioscia's contract still having another four years to go before 2015, Arte wasnt going to budge after having to eat the contract of Hambone. I remember seeing some accounts that Hambone was another ill-advised pick that Arte simply had to have. But maybe not.

However, if Hambone was Arte's latest pet project, then Dipoto faced an owner who went around him and a manager who refused to implement his vision.

Anyway, we certainly didnt draft well for a few year, there. REALLY INTERESTING WRITE-UP !!!!! I enjoyed the heck out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WeatherWonk said:

I still dont know how I feel about Dipoto's departure. This is irrespective of his performance.

If Scioscia was resisting the SABR style mantra that Dipoto was probably selling, and if Scioscia was not implementing it (which DID seem to take a while for him to embrace), and Arte backed Scioscia, then I think I would have quit, too. It would be frustrating to try and change the whole strategy of the organization and have it be ignored by the field manager.

Scioscia's contract still having another four years to go before 2015, Arte wasnt going to budge after having to eat the contract of Hambone. I remember seeing some accounts that Hambone was another ill-advised pick that Arte simply had to have. But maybe not.

However, if Hambone was Arte's latest pet project, then Dipoto faced an owner who went around him and a manager who refused to implement his vision.

Anyway, we certainly didnt draft well for a few year, there. REALLY INTERESTING WRITE-UP !!!!! I enjoyed the heck out of it.

Yeah, I'm conflicted about Dipoto's departure as well.  The thing is we only have a narrow window into what actually happened, depending a lot on rumor and hearsay so it's hard to take a firm opinion either way...at the very least, your opinion of the result of the issue tends to fall on whether you preferred Jerry Dipoto or Mike Scioscia having more of an influence on the clubhouse.

Nothing really definitive either way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mulwin444 said:

Does Arte interview each individual scout prior to hiring them?  

Our scouts are incompetent for the most part. Can't draft a 3rd baseman to save their life.  Look at the revolving door in LF.  The list goes on.  Arte should have realized the current ones suck and gotten new ones.  Whomever interviews the scouts needs to be replaced too.  Something needed to change and nothing has.  Yeah, Arte also made mistakes pushing for Pujols and Hamilton but those are just apart of why this team is where it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WeatherWonk said:

I still dont know how I feel about Dipoto's departure. This is irrespective of his performance.

If Scioscia was resisting the SABR style mantra that Dipoto was probably selling, and if Scioscia was not implementing it (which DID seem to take a while for him to embrace), and Arte backed Scioscia, then I think I would have quit, too. It would be frustrating to try and change the whole strategy of the organization and have it be ignored by the field manager.

Scioscia's contract still having another four years to go before 2015, Arte wasnt going to budge after having to eat the contract of Hambone. I remember seeing some accounts that Hambone was another ill-advised pick that Arte simply had to have. But maybe not.

However, if Hambone was Arte's latest pet project, then Dipoto faced an owner who went around him and a manager who refused to implement his vision.

Anyway, we certainly didnt draft well for a few year, there. REALLY INTERESTING WRITE-UP !!!!! I enjoyed the heck out of it.

Theres always going to be mysteries surrounding it all. Nobody on the inside ever really came clean about what happened. Who was in charge, who wanted hamilton, etc etc etc.

I do know that sosh and dipoto hated each other. Prior to the blowup, they werent talking for a long time. A lot of tension. The blowup was over a lineup.

At the time, it was easy to blame sosh. It looked identical to the moneyball movie. But as time passed, with a step back and look at the big picture....lol....one only has to look at @mulwin444's breakdown to see what really killed the team...and it wasnt sosh's lineups.

Sosh may lose games by not starting this guy, batting this guy out of order, etc. Dipoto killed a generation. 

Its like blaming the general for losing a battle, when it was the president sending him off to war without the resources to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, beatlesrule said:

Our scouts are incompetent for the most part. Can't draft a 3rd baseman to save their life.  Look at the revolving door in LF.  The list goes on.  Arte should have realized the current ones suck and gotten new ones.  Whomever interviews the scouts needs to be replaced too.  Something needed to change and nothing has.  Yeah, Arte also made mistakes pushing for Pujols and Hamilton but those are just apart of why this team is where it is.

To be fair, dont forget dipoto got rid of a ton of our long time scouts and brought in his own people. That's a GMs job, not the owner. 

He did the same thing as soon as he got to seattle....and look at their farm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure most teams could make a similar list to be honest.  

Draft position matters.  Drafting in the top 10 is very different than not, and we for the most part have not been drafting high enough to get guys that were guarantees as some others have.  No question we made some mistakes, but i dont think thats very unique to us in that regard.  Most of those who are really good now were really bad for an extended period, Hou, Chi etc...  We have had bad years, but not what i would call an extended drought in the last decade or under Moreno period.

Dipoto traded away too much in an effort to win, its who he is, its exactly what hes doing now in Sea and i suspect they too will pay the price for it.  It didnt work out for us and i dont think it will for them either.

We made some bad signings that hurt us, that we didnt get what we expected for it. 

I dont think you can say there is any one root to our issues or what led to them, its a hydra of problems.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, beatlesrule said:

Our scouts are incompetent for the most part. Can't draft a 3rd baseman to save their life.  Look at the revolving door in LF.  The list goes on.  Arte should have realized the current ones suck and gotten new ones.  Whomever interviews the scouts needs to be replaced too.  Something needed to change and nothing has.  Yeah, Arte also made mistakes pushing for Pujols and Hamilton but those are just apart of why this team is where it is.

I think it's been pretty much addressed with Eppler's hiring but I guess we'll see.  Just looking at the drafts since 2016, though, what has been available:

2016:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=craig-003wil

2017:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=burger000jak

2018:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=gorman000nol

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=casas-000tri

These are just guys designated as 3B and drafted after we drafted in the 1st round after those respective years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking on all these previously injured/injury prone/once high ceiling guys is also not working out, and aren't some of them on Eppler's watch? There's no wonder why we have so many pitcher injuries when we got them all as damaged goods for a cheap price hoping they'd stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not just about Eppler. Dallas was supposed to replace Glaus.  That didn't work out and the Angels haven't replaced him since.  They tried with Figgins but he left for Seattle.  Hell, the Angels couldn't even sign Beltre even though he wanted to play here.  It's straight incompetence and that's only the black hole at 3rd.  I'm very jealous of other ORGs like the Red Sox, Yankees, Cards etc.  They have such smart people in charge and win World Series.  They knww what they're doing.  A lot of times, the Angels are running around with their heads cut off.  They've had the best player in baseball for 6 years and haven't won a damn playoff series and only got there once.  It's pathetic. Especially since the Angels play in a big market. Oh and crap on Dipoto all you want but he did get Segura back.  I was very opposed to him being traded at the time and thought it was nuts unless they resigned Grienke.  Dipoto went ahead and got back Segura like the Angels should have done.  Still haven't replaced Kendrick at 2nd and Segura could have been that replacement.  More incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, floplag said:

Im pretty sure most teams could make a similar list to be honest.  

Draft position matters.  Drafting in the top 10 is very different than not, and we for the most part have not been drafting high enough to get guys that were guarantees as some others have.  No question we made some mistakes, but i dont think thats very unique to us in that regard.  Most of those who are really good now were really bad for an extended period, Hou, Chi etc...  We have had bad years, but not what i would call an extended drought in the last decade or under Moreno period.

Dipoto traded away too much in an effort to win, its who he is, its exactly what hes doing now in Sea and i suspect they too will pay the price for it.  It didnt work out for us and i dont think it will for them either.

We made some bad signings that hurt us, that we didnt get what we expected for it. 

I dont think you can say there is any one root to our issues or what led to them, its a hydra of problems.
 

Well, it was multifaceted, I just focused on the draft because that is usually where you build your farm.  There was a lot of risk taking that didn't pay off: we signed Pujols, Wilson and Hamilton and that didn't pay off with multiple playoff appearances leaving us with a fat bill and shallow returns...trades that were made didn't return value...we exited the international market and, when we re-entered, we blew our nut on Baldoquin, while taking us out of the market for a bit.

It was a 6 season collective shit-storm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mulwin444 said:

Well, it was multifaceted, I just focused on the draft because that is usually where you build your farm.  There was a lot of risk taking that didn't pay off: we signed Pujols, Wilson and Hamilton and that didn't pay off with multiple playoff appearances leaving us with a fat bill and shallow returns...trades that were made didn't return value...we exited the international market and, when we re-entered, we blew our nut on Baldoquin, while taking us out of the market for a bit.

It was a 6 season collective shit-storm

IDK, there are many ways to build a farm.  The draft is the obvious largest contributor, but trades can be made to affect that as well as rule 5 etc... Our trades have been sending them out, not bringing them in.  Recently we've made a couple in the opposite direction that will help.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often is a rule 5 guy a significant impact player ?  Every now and then I guess, not often. You build the farm by drafting and by trading ML assets. 

@mulwin444 mapped it out pretty clearly.  They traded away a bunch of the better prospects.  They signed FA so lost draft picks.  And when they did get a shot at the draft they fu*cked up.  This was year or over year over year.  Mike Trout made our floor really high.  That’s what stands out to me.  It’s sort of incredible we weren’t competeting for the worst record in some these recent seasons.  

Edited by UndertheHalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jobu said:

Didn't the Angels stay out of the international market due to some fallout over a scandal?

Also, given the very clear shift in results as soon as Bane lost control and left, I've always been confused as to why he didn't land an equivalent job after. 

Ya I’m not super familiar with this story but I think one of our international guys was shady AF.  Scared Arte out for years.  Not great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice job @mulwin444

the lack of intl presence is what I feel tops the list.  almost completely ignoring 1/3rd of the player pool for 5-7 years and then getting put into the penalty box due to baldoquin.  Imagine is we gave away 3 of our top ten picks every year for 7 years.  Plus, that was during a time where the financial rules were more lax and big market teams could outspend to grab the best players.  Something the Yankees, Rangers, Cubs and a few other teams did well.  

then the draft strategy of high floor  or just really shitty drafts  

trading rentals for short term players

then the lack of picks (-1 in 2011, -2 in 2012, -1 in 2013).  There is probably 2 major leaguers in there that we missed out on at best.  

2010 sucked, but there wasn't a ton of talent in that draft.  Odds are we could have hit on at least one solid major leaguer and didn't.  But in the end, we're talking about missing out on one player really when you look at what was available.  

Reagins actually had a few nice transactions under his belt until the Kazmir trade.  Then Fuentes happened and Arte went into a hard court press and Reagins either lost his way under the pressure or Arte just took over.  Then he let Vlad go for Matsui, traded for Haren, traded for Wells.  And then the perception became that he was a fish among sharks.  

Billy has done a solid job.  Especially at accumulating upside talent in our minor league system.  But his inability to judge short term major league players - whether via trade or FA contract - has hurt.   

poor performance and/or a lack of talent has been a major factor for the mlb club the last 4 years, but make no mistake that injuries have been catastrophic.  The lack of minor league depth to make up for those injuries has also been a killer.  

We are just now, finding our way around that to some degree, but not all the way by any stretch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eaterfan said:

I think the root of the problem is a little bit more troubling. Who did the Angels draft from 2005-2008? 

2005: We signed Orlando Cabrera and the Red Sox got our pick which they used to draft Jacoby Ellsbury (31.1 WAR) and, with our supplemental 1st round pick, we chose Trevor "Bozo" Bell (-1.3 WAR) when we could have had Clay Buchholz (16.3 WAR) or Jed Lowrie (16.3 WAR).  We selected P.J. Phillips in the 2nd round.

2006: We selected Hank Conger (2.1 WAR) late in the 1st round but there wasn't much else available the rest of the round.  We lost our 2nd round pick with the Hector Carrasco signing.  

2007: We lost our pick to the Rangers for the Gary Matthews Jr signing and lost 2nd round pick for the Justin Speier signing...we picked Jon Bachanov late (56th) in the supplemental round.  We picked Matt Harvey in the 3rd round who didn't sign obviously.

2008: We lost our pick to the Twins for signing Torii Hunter.  We picked Tyler Chatwood in the 2nd round.

Not pretty...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, eaterfan said:

I think the root of the problem is a little bit more troubling. Who did the Angels draft from 2005-2008? 

that was significant as well

2005 - peter bourjos, trevor bell, sean o'sullivan

2006 - hank conger, jordan walden

2007 - john bachanov, an unsigned matt harvey, andrew romine

2008 - chatwood, will smith, michael kohn, johnny hellweg.  

That is literally on major leaguer, a bench guy and a couple relievers from 4 drafts in a row.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...