Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2020 Election


2020 Election  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you value more?

    • The U.S. Constitution and the will of the voters
      3290
    • #Overturn!
      8


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Maybe we can have two presidents. A Republican who represents the 20% of Americans in rural areas, and a Democrat who represents everyone else.

Since Trump has just stated that he's not president of the blue states then I think we should seperate red and blue.

Let's see how long the red states survive without socialism from the blue states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Redondo said:

EXCLUSIVE: Half of '19 donations totaling $346M to ActBlue came from 'unemployed' donors, data shows

A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement.

 

Or, what if those donations actually came from people who were retired or unemployed? I know that explanation isn't nearly as reasonable as a conspiracy theory about foreign involvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Or, what if those donations actually came from people who were retired or unemployed? I know that explanation isn't nearly as reasonable as a conspiracy theory about foreign involvement.

Campaign finance fraud and foreign election interference is something Fox News and Redondo take very seriously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taylor said:

Maybe we can have two presidents. A Republican who represents the 20% of Americans in rural areas, and a Democrat who represents everyone else.

Maybe we should correct the false narrative that the President is supposed to “represent” the people.  We have a House of Representatives for that.
 

The President of the United States is an executive position, one that is supposed to Preside over the Unity of the States (not represent the population).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dtwncbad said:

Maybe we should correct the false narrative that the President is supposed to “represent” the people.  We have a House of Representatives for that.
 

The President of the United States is an executive position, one that is supposed to Preside over the Unity of the States (not represent the population).

Which candidate for president has stated that they will represent everyone, even those who don't vote for him?

And which has consistently maintained that he is only president of the states that did vote for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Dtwncbad said:

Maybe we should correct the false narrative that the President is supposed to “represent” the people.  We have a House of Representatives for that.
 

The President of the United States is an executive position, one that is supposed to Preside over the Unity of the States (not represent the population).

Maybe We should correct the false narrative that we should just Capitalize Some Words just for The cutesy pie hell of It.

Please get your life in order. Angry and ignorant is not a good way to go through life, son.

Carry on!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Taylor said:

Which candidate for president has stated that they will represent everyone, even those who don't vote for him?

And which has consistently maintained that he is only president of the states that did vote for him?

Not only that, tries to withdraw federal aid appropriated by Congress from states that don't bow down to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...