Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2020 Election


2020 Election  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you value more?

    • The U.S. Constitution and the will of the voters
      3290
    • #Overturn!
      8


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Blarg said:

Look, I get it, there wasn't a twitter link for you to post but once in a while try Google for information. If you want to dispute something find the evidence to dispute it with, otherwise quit saying, Not So, like a little girl. 

I looked high and low and could only find data for 2017, 2018, and 2019.  If he has more information on the previous years I would be interested in seeing it.  But right now his claim can't be proven or disproved.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Chuck pinned this topic
19 hours ago, Blarg said:

Yes, if you disagree the burden is upon you to prove it wrong. Not just say it isn't so without any evidence backing your claim. 

Even though you're almost certainly trolling, here's a few links for you to ignore:

https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm#:~:text=Shifting the burden of proof%2C a special case of argumentum,is true unless proven otherwise.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens's_razor

https://effectiviology.com/burden-of-proof/

 

Basically, you're wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...