Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Spin Forum Dumping Bin


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jason

    2376

  • Taylor

    1719

  • St1ck

    1596

  • Lhalo

    1448

Todd claimed that his Sunday program did not make the "edit" but that it simply saw the edited quote before seeing the full quote.

"Now, we did not edit that out. That was not our edit. We didn't include it because we only saw the shorter of two clips that CBS did air," Todd explained. "We should have looked at both and checked for a full transcript, a mistake I wish we had not made and one that I wish I had not have [sic] made. The second part of the attorney general's answer would have put it in the proper context and had I seen that part of the interview, I would not have framed the conversation the way I did."

 

How about doing your homework before running with stories?

So many things being said before the homework is done. The people run with the information even though it's not true and by the time it gets retracted most still believe it. It's deceptive journalism.

 

 

Edited by Redondo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

chuck todd is full of crap. always been a "gotcha" type reporter.

it's amazing to me how after all this time of trump yammering away about fake news, these morons just keep playing into his narrative and proving him right. they can't help themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Redondo said:

Todd claimed that his Sunday program did not make the "edit" but that it simply saw the edited quote before seeing the full quote.

"Now, we did not edit that out. That was not our edit. We didn't include it because we only saw the shorter of two clips that CBS did air," Todd explained. "We should have looked at both and checked for a full transcript, a mistake I wish we had not made and one that I wish I had not have [sic] made. The second part of the attorney general's answer would have put it in the proper context and had I seen that part of the interview, I would not have framed the conversation the way I did."

 

How about doing your homework before running with stories?

So many things being said before the homework is done. The people run with the information even though it's not true and by the time it gets retracted most still believe it. It's deceptive journalism.

 

 

It's still a creepy fucking thing for Barr to say even when you include the second part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This judge is out of control. I wonder how much the dems are paying him?

Federal judge mulls contempt charge against Michael Flynn

Judge Emmet Sullivan named a retired judge to weigh the issue after the Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss the case against the former Trump national security adviser.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/13/judge-appoints-retired-judge-to-represent-flynn-prosecution-256509

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...