Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Brad Ausmus on the collision at homeplate


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Calzone 2 said:

Remember that Lucroy never has possession of the ball so therefore is also in violation.

To be in violation, he has to be blocking the plate.

He wasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RBM said:

So I guess what you don’t understand is, well, a couple of things actually. 

1. Photography. You’re looking at the wrong angle Daddy. 

2. The rule. Lucroy was set up in fair territory Daddy, with his left foot out front and inside the plate. The entire plate was wide open for a runner rounding third. Problem was said runner decided to veer into fair territory and away from the plate initiating contact. 

Lucroy wasn’t even on the plate. His back ?  for was a foot in front of the plate and his front ? was three feet in front of the plate. The runner would have to run outside  of the baseline to even attempt to slide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Troll Daddy said:

I don’t see any part of the plate exposed for the runner. 

 

Youre going to ride this horse till it dies, but still shots dont tell the story.   Perhaps you heard of a hook slide or any other slide technique to avoid a tag?   No?
OK, how aboutthe fact that they are both on the same side of that white line?  No?  
OH, how about the lowering of the shoulder?   The fact that he went high at the head?  Any of this ringing any bells?    
Probably not... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The catcher is allowed fair territory.

If there is a bad throw, and the catcher goes into foul territory, without the ball, the runner has the right to collide with the catcher.

Lucroy was in fair territory the entire time, and Marisnick clearly did not attempt to stay in foul territory and slide into home plate. What Marisnick did was an old school "take out the catcher" approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, floplag said:

Youre going to ride this horse till it dies, but still shots dont tell the story.   Perhaps you heard of a hook slide or any other slide technique to avoid a tag?   No?
OK, how aboutthe fact that they are both on the same side of that white line?  No?  
OH, how about the lowering of the shoulder?   The fact that he went high at the head?  Any of this ringing any bells?    
Probably not... 

Hook slide ? how’s that possible when Lucroy is way out in front of the plate.

Lowing his shoulders with his hands and arms outstretched? 

He hit his head with his face not his shoulders ... which was just as dangerous for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Lou said:

To be in violation, he has to be blocking the plate.

He wasn't. 

It was a quick play but Lucroy’s left foot was temporarily in foul territory without possession of the ball. He adjusted to the right but it was too late.

E7D19803-8FD0-4F4F-9F97-48FCB09137D6.jpeg

Edited by Calzone 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it doesn't matter where lucroy was, where Marisnick was, or where the ball was.  The intent of the rule is to avoid this type of contact.  Even if the catcher is blocking a direct path, then the runner is supposed to go around him because they have the easier ability to alter their course.   The runner avoids contact and then the play can be reviewed to determine of the Catcher was inappropriately blocking the plate.  

Marisnick initiated contact.  Clearly and end of story.  The purpose of the new rule is to keep that from happening.  Whether he gets suspended is another story but there was a path to go around and he didn't take it.  I doubt he meant to injure him but it certainly seems like he intended to make 

Another nuance.  Catchers are instructed to catch the ball in fair territory and therefore runner have been instructed to go to the outside.  It's not a rule per se, but expected.  Catchers no longer set themselves up in a defensive position for the impact of an oncoming runner because the runner is not supposed to him them under any circumstance.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ScottT said:

Marisnick changed directions, but clearly didn't know where the ball was coming. How could he?  That was not dirty.  No way.  

?  He changed direction to his left.   Right into the path of where a catcher would be.  If he was trying to score he takes a step to his right in effort to slide around the tag!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...