Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Does anyone miss the Autry days?


Torridd

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, floplag said:

 Interesting thought.  I do not miss at all being told were a small market club, that was laughable, but i do miss the cowboy.
We never really had great expectations back then, though we would go get a name here and there but i always hated being the step child of the LA market.  
Alas it would seem were hearkening back to those days again with fixed budgets and profits over winning this time for all the wrong reasons.  I got it back then we didnt have the resources we do today, i dont get it now.  I hope im proven wrong about that soon. 

I should have said Gene Autry days. That's what I meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issues isnt personal wealth of the owners, its about team revenue and capabilities. 

We didnt draw the attendance we do then, you could walk up to the gate at game time and get amazing seats, i did it many times.

The team today has a lucrative TV deal, no debt, investors, top level attendance, revenue sharing and other proceeds.  The revenue streams available today make more options viable without even considering the owners wealth, but if you want to go there ill remind you that this team has increased in value over 10 times since Arte bought it, thats one hell of a return on investment as far as i can see.  We could easily blow away the tax for a few years if we wanted to and even the investors wouldn't likely notice.

I see a huge difference between today and those days myself.  Ive never expected the owner to gut his personal finances for a winner, thats silly, noone does that its not sustainable... but in this case today, when we could do so easily without him touching his personal accounts, yeah, i feel like im entitled to that view after watching and reading this club for over 40 years now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, floplag said:

The issues isnt personal wealth of the owners, its about team revenue and capabilities. 

We didnt draw the attendance we do then, you could walk up to the gate at game time and get amazing seats, i did it many times.

The team today has a lucrative TV deal, no debt, investors, top level attendance, revenue sharing and other proceeds.  The revenue streams available today make more options viable without even considering the owners wealth, but if you want to go there ill remind you that this team has increased in value over 10 times since Arte bought it, thats one hell of a return on investment as far as i can see.  We could easily blow away the tax for a few years if we wanted to and even the investors wouldn't likely notice.

I see a huge difference between today and those days myself.  Ive never expected the owner to gut his personal finances for a winner, thats silly, noone does that its not sustainable... but in this case today, when we could do so easily without him touching his personal accounts, yeah, i feel like im entitled to that view after watching and reading this club for over 40 years now. 

You seemingly can't see the forest for the trees here...  It was Arte's willingness to invest his personal fortune that grew the revenues and everything else.  Jackie openly mocked Moreno when he bought the team and talked about pumping money into the team to grow his business.  

Btw, Autry had no debt, he owned the TV station that aired the team's games and KTLA was aired over cable the same way WGN and WTBS were.   The Angels led the AL in total attendance for the 80s decade, twice setting the AL single season attendance record.. And paying into revenue sharing doesn't make the team money,  it's costs them dollars.   Basically none of your talking points help your cause.  

Lastly... He bought the Angels for 2 million... Sold them for 150 million.

 

Edited by Inside Pitch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Inside Pitch said:

You seemingly can't see the forest for the trees here...  It was Arte's willingness to invest his personal fortune that grew the revenues and everything else.  Jackie openly mocked Moreno when he bought the team and talked about pumping money into the team to grow his business.  

Btw, Autry had no debt, he owned the TV station that aired the team's games and KTLA was aired over cable the same way WGN and WTBS were.   The Angels led the AL in total attendance for the 80s decade, twice setting the AL single season attendance record.. And paying into revenue sharing doesn't make the team money,  it's costs them dollars.   Basically none of your talking points help your cause.  

Lastly... He bought the Angels for 2 million... Sold them for 150 million.

 

Jackie was a blight on the franchise that set us back tremendously over her greed. 
You can think what you will about the rest, i was there, ill keep my own council on that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, floplag said:

Jackie was a blight on the franchise that set us back tremendously over her greed. 
You can think what you will about the rest, i was there, ill keep my own council on that

So was I, and everything I said was correct.  I should have added that Autry had investors until 1983, when he finally bought them out. 

You stand fast with your opinions, I'll let the facts speak for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, floplag said:

Its funny how many people come out of the woodwork to bash Autry, yet defend Arte when people like me suggest he spend over what they seem to think are the same issues? 

I didn't bash Autry.  I'm not defending Moreno.   I've also not bashed you for suggesting he spend more.  Facts are a powerful thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Inside Pitch said:

I didn't bash Autry.  I'm not defending Moreno.   I've also not bashed you for suggesting he spend more.  Facts are a powerful thing.

Yes, they are. But we seem to far too often confuse opinion and interpretation with fact.  ill just leave it at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eaterfan said:

Does anyone miss the days before electricity? I was having nostalgia for the days when we never had power outages. Sure there were no lights, tv, or internet but I prefer it. Thoughts?

Back when people had to draw flip books to watch porn. And even then, you could only watch during daylight.

Back then people in alaska would scoff at no nut november.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Angel Oracle said:

With salaries exploding, it was only a matter of time before the Autrys were priced out of MLB.

Jackie Autry did gain $148 million when sold to Disney.   However, today, that will get you one decent year's payroll. 

........ holy crap. Thats a good way to put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revenue sharing negatively impacts the halos ability to spend.  

the business of baseball has changed so much from 1980 to now, it's like trying to compare Trout to Ty Cobb.  

the min salary and avg salary in 1980 were 30k and 143k respectively.  Now they are 507k and almost 4 mil.  Increases of 18x and 28x respectively.  

Arte has seen a 10x increase in the value of the Angels team since 2003.  Autry saw a 10x increase but over a much longer period. 

At the end of the day, neither Gene nor Arty are/were losing money.  

My biggest issue with Arte isn't the halos payroll.  I think what he's willing to spend is plenty to field a winning team.  My issue is that he is complicit in some of the mistakes that were made relative to poor decision making.  It wasn't spending that got him in trouble.  It was spending stupidly.  Mike Trout is a golden goose.  How much revenue over the last 6-7 years can be traced back to him?  Push payroll a bit because of those mistakes.  I am not implying that he needed to hand out other huge contracts and compound the problem, but he could have given the ok to have his gm thoughtfully stop gap 2b, LF, SP etc with short term deals instead of fielding teams that included Johnny Giavotella, Ortega/Nava/Gentry,   Revere/Maybin, Espinosa, or a crew of oft injured starters and a bunch of waiver pickups to bridge the inevitable innings gaps.  

Maybe he's actually pushed things further that he's wanted to already and it's just hard to tell because we don't know the true finances but it feels like the next two years would be the optimum time to extend.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...