Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Stock Market: The Thread


Recommended Posts

Just now, Brandon said:

it's actually not bad. the p&i payment on 1.5m will be ~7.8k and 300k annually is 25k a month. the front end dti (housing cost) is 32%. maybe with escrows, since property taxes on that amount will be nuts, it jumps up to ~40%......not too out of the realm of the ratios most people have.

Well, while I agree that it's "affordable," I would say that's a strong way to become house poor.  Paying 32% of your gross income just to pay PITI seems like a poor idea.  Now that said, if you expect your income to explode in the upcoming years, then it's a decent gamble.  But if you are in a job where you just expect normal wage growth, then it's probably a bad idea.  I'd say 3x gross income is a better target, with 4x probably being the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3x or even 4x gross income is a pipe dream for a lot of buyers in some of the more desirable areas in CA.  We've been looking to get into a house but needing to sell our place and being a contingent buyer right now we can't compete with buyers who are looking to buy without a contingency.  There was a place that came on the market about a month ago that was really nice as far as what we're looking for and they had multiple offers at asking or above less than an hour into the open house.  Unless we see more come on the market and feel that as contingent buyers a seller will consider our offer we will stand pat.  To be blunt we feel like the market is overpriced but if/when a correction happens is anyone's guess.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Catwhoshatinthehat said:

3x or even 4x gross income is a pipe dream for a lot of buyers in some of the more desirable areas in CA.  We've been looking to get into a house but needing to sell our place and being a contingent buyer right now we can't compete with buyers who are looking to buy without a contingency.  There was a place that came on the market about a month ago that was really nice as far as what we're looking for and they had multiple offers at asking or above less than an hour into the open house.  Unless we see more come on the market and feel that as contingent buyers a seller will consider our offer we will stand pat.  To be blunt we feel like the market is overpriced but if/when a correction happens is anyone's guess.   

I hear ya, I'm living in one of those expensive places.  There are trade-offs to make, such as maybe buying a smaller home in that desireable area, or finding another area to buy the home of your dreams instead.  I opted for the former.

I don't think the market will crater like it did last decade.  Values could dip a little, but there's too much equity in the market for any kind of panic selling / significant price drops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in one of those areas too.  We have no problem going for a place a bit smaller but in the area we're looking at some of those places need about 50K or more in work done.  We saw one in the low 7's a few months back that was off market in a few days and it was mostly original inside, circa 1960's.  I don't think the market will crater either but on a national and local level we've seen median home prices outpacing inflation/wage growth which sometimes leads to a correction.  That said the local markets are anything but predictable.  A lot of people we grew up with in our city have been priced out and if more comes on the market it will be interesting to see if properties sit longer, especially as rates go up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Warfarin said:

Well, while I agree that it's "affordable," I would say that's a strong way to become house poor.  Paying 32% of your gross income just to pay PITI seems like a poor idea.  Now that said, if you expect your income to explode in the upcoming years, then it's a decent gamble.  But if you are in a job where you just expect normal wage growth, then it's probably a bad idea.  I'd say 3x gross income is a better target, with 4x probably being the cap.

i find it always depends on the persons spending habits and debt. if they have no debt, while it's not my cup of tea, it's not off base. if someone has a 32% dti but no debt and a 740+ fico who am i or anyone to tell them how to handle their finances. i see what you are saying though, but 18 years of taking loan apps it's within the norm and why fannie and freddie go up to ~43% on the front end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Brandon said:

i find it always depends on the persons spending habits and debt. if they have no debt, while it's not my cup of tea, it's not off base. if someone has a 32% dti but no debt and a 740+ fico who am i or anyone to tell them how to handle their finances. i see what you are saying though, but 18 years of taking loan apps it's within the norm and why fannie and freddie go up to ~43% on the front end.

Right.  I can't presume to tell anyone what is best for their personal situation, but I do think the "average" person, so to speak, should be avoiding that kind of situation.  But that said, I agree, there are definitely people who are uniquely positioned to absorb that kind of situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Again, remember im an idiot at this stuff (among other things). Is that good news?

Both the NASDAQ and DOW were down just 3 weeks ago some 11% from their all time highs reached in mid-January.    They have improved significantly since 3 weeks back.   A 10% decline is generally called a correction.   Fortunately, that correction has pretty much been reversed in just 3 weeks.   It's been a crazy two months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

I feel like the guideline of 30ish percent of income for a home payment goes out the window at some level of income. When your making 300k, the other 60 to 70 percent of your income is going to be a lot more money than 60 to 70 percent at 140k.

While true, one could argue you'd be better served (in terms of wealth accumulation) of taking that income surplus and putting it into a stock market, vs. buying a more expensive primary residence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...