Is Noah Syndergaard a possibility?

[Taylor]

3 hours ago, Vlad27Trout27 said:

Nope...Mets just said there not trading him and if they do, it's going to be for a big package.

Is Escobar still around?

[angelsnationtalk]

19 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

I hate to break it to people but Ward has almost zero trade value in trying to acquire a controllable front line starter.

He could be a piece in a deal for a pedestrian depth starter.

I understand. Ward is more like a throw in.

[tdawg87]

26 minutes ago, angelsnationtalk said:

I’d go bold. 
Simmons, Marsh, Yan, Jackson for Thor

or

Marsh, Suarez, Jackson, Yan, Ward for Thor.

only legit prospect you lose is Marsh. Suarez is replaceable with Thor and if you sign Cole and Wheeler. Yan would become a bullpen arm by the time he’s MLB ready and Ward is off the depth chart. Adding Simmons in would be a good incentive plus a salary dump for the Angels to afford 3 pitchers.

Neither of those trades are bold. You said it yourself, "only legit prospect you lose is Marsh". 

See this is the crap I was making fun of you turds for. We give up a bunch of nothing and concede our 2nd best prospect and get a legit frontline starter. Not gonna happen.

I'm not singling you out, angelsnation. Every fanbase does it. Nobody wants to give up anything of significant value in a trade. So trade proposals end up being lol.

Basically, we'd be looking at giving up our top 4 prospects (including Adell and Marsh) for Syndergaard. That's the only way this happens and even then that might not be enough because our system isn't as strong as many others. 

But who knows? Maybe the Mets GM has a boner for Jose Suarez and Taylor Ward and another prospect who barely cracks our top 20.

I'm just busting your balls, but I don't think Syndergaard is an option. Not enough years of control and the cost is way too much. We honestly can't afford a trade like that right now without completely dismantling our farm system. But Arte can afford to open up his wallet juuust a bit more than normal to get some pitchers who aren't complete Facking dumpster fires.

[Torridd]

2 hours ago, Inside Pitch said:

Mets GM has gone on record that neither Diaz or Syndergaard will be moved...

 

Don't GMs say that stuff all the time though?

[Inside Pitch]

28 minutes ago, Torridd said:

Don't GMs say that stuff all the time though?

This one repeatedly didn't say it when he was the new sheriff in town.  Now the Wilpons are supposedly meddling.  The same Wilpons that have refused to let previous GMs trade players they like or see as draws.

[failos]

Definitely a possibility in Lala land

[Lou]

We're not getting Syndergaard 

[Dtwncbad]

12 minutes ago, Lou said:

Were not getting Syndergaard 

4 words.

I bet you have fewer words posted overall in your 29,760 posts than most with 5k posts.

Now you can respond with one word “probably.”

Edited October 7, 2019 by Dtwncbad

[Stradling]

Just now, Dtwncbad said:

4 words.

I bet you have fewer words posted overall in your 29,760 posts than most with 5k posts.

He's probably right and if he is wrong, then he will just "I agree" himself.  Its win win.  

[Lou]

6 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

4 words.

I bet you have fewer words posted overall in your 29,760 posts than most with 5k posts.

Now you can respond with one word “probably.”

Only because I don't ramble on like an idiot. 

Er, I mean ... I agree 

[Lou]

7 minutes ago, Stradling said:

He's probably right and if he is wrong, then he will just "I agree" himself.  Its win win.  

Nope. I'm right. 

[Stradling]

5 minutes ago, Lou said:

Nope. I'm right. 

I agree.

[Dtwncbad]

13 minutes ago, Lou said:

Only because I don't ramble on like an idiot. 

Er, I mean ... I agree 

Wow, was I just called an idiot for innocuously noting how brief you always are?

A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

[Lou]

4 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

Wow, was I just called an idiot for innocuously noting how brief you always are?

A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

Not at all.

[Dtwncbad]

3 minutes ago, Lou said:

Not at all.

Wasn’t sure.  Sounded like it could have been a comment directed at me personally.

Sorry, I am getting long winded here.

[ukyah]

don't trade adell.

don't trade marsh.

those are the two guys that may be the punch in the middle of this lineup that we need with trout AND they both allow us to sign some FA's to get this Facker sailing.

 

[tdawg87]

5 hours ago, Dtwncbad said:

4 words.

I bet you have fewer words posted overall in your 29,760 posts than most with 5k posts.

Now you can respond with one word “probably.”

That's the like count, not the post count.

[tdawg87]

Also I agree

[tdawg87]

Maybe

[ten ocho recon scout]

12 hours ago, Vlad27Trout27 said:

Nope...Mets just said there not trading him and if they do, it's going to be for a big package.

 

[ten ocho recon scout]

9 hours ago, Taylor said:

Is Escobar still around?

Gawdammit!

[Lou]

2 minutes ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Gawdammit!

your execution was better

[Vlad27Trout27]

so...I'm confused? what's the deal with Escobar?

[Stradling]

3 minutes ago, Vlad27Trout27 said:

so...I'm confused? what's the deal with Escobar?

He had a big dick

[Vlad27Trout27]

Well i did not need to know about that.... What if the Mets are fine with this, go ahead.