Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Millennials like socialism - until they get jobs


Recommended Posts

The reason is the only people who like Hillary are Hillary supporters. Bernie supporters are not going to vote for her in the general.

 

http://www.laweekly.com/news/sorry-bernie-bros-but-sanders-supporters-are-ready-to-back-clinton-6765337

 

Seventy-seven percent of them say they would vote for Clinton in a general election match-up against Donald Trump, though nearly half – 45 percent – would do so reluctantly, and 15 percent would refuse to vote for her at all," USC said in a statement.

 

The article above is in relation to CA but other recent articles say that about 30% or so if his supporters are saying they wouldn't vote for her in a general election while about 70% currently say they would whether they view her favorably or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll stand corrected.

 

I refuse to vote for her though. I think she's the most dishonest politician out there, and stands for everything that's wrong with our system. I don't know how she has the support she does honestly.

 

 

2politifact032016grONLINE.png

 

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/28/hillary-clinton-honest-transparency-jill-abramson

 

As an editor I’ve launched investigations into her business dealings, her fundraising, her foundation and her marriage. As a reporter my stories stretch back to Whitewater. I’m not a favorite in Hillaryland. That makes what I want to say next surprising.

Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy.

The yardsticks I use for measuring a politician’s honesty are pretty simple. Ever since I was an investigative reporter covering the nexus of money and politics, I’ve looked for connections between money (including campaign donations, loans, Super Pac funds, speaking fees, foundation ties) and official actions. I’m on the lookout for lies, scrutinizing statements candidates make in the heat of an election.

The connection between money and action is often fuzzy. Many investigative articles about Clinton end up “raising serious questions” about “potential” conflicts of interest or lapses in her judgment. Of course, she should be held accountable. It was bad judgment, as she has said, to use a private email server. It was colossally stupid to take those hefty speaking fees, but not corrupt. There are no instances I know of where Clinton was doing the bidding of a donor or benefactor.

As for her statements on issues, Politifact, a Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking organization, gives Clinton the best truth-telling record of any of the 2016 presidential candidates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So since Kasich is the most honest, I imagine AFL will be supporting him for POTUS 

 

Probably says a lot that the Republican candidate who scores highest on the honesty meter is the one with the least chance of winning the Republican primary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...