Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

OC Register: Angels owner Arte Moreno says he’s around ‘for the long term’


Recommended Posts

TEMPE, Ariz. — Arte Moreno has no regrets about the change of heart that led him to pull the Angels off the market 13 months ago.

The Angels owner said Wednesday that he has no plans to revisit a sale of the team that he’s operated since 2003.

“I am here long term,” Moreno said in an interview with the Southern California News Group. “There are some people that came back and some people that knew I had it on the market (in 2022). I basically said it’s not on the market.”

Moreno added that it was always possible that someone would come back and make an offer that he couldn’t refuse.

“I’m a business person,” he said. “If someone gets really stupid, then you have to go.”

Moreno said a year ago that he had turned down offers, including three that surpassed the $2.4 billion that Steve Cohen paid for the New York Mets. One of the offers was reportedly over $3 billion.

Moreno, 77, paid $183.5 million to buy the Angels more than two decades ago.

Although his ownership was a success initially, with the Angels annually contending and selling more than 3 million tickets per season, the franchise has been struggling on the field lately.

Despite the presence of two-way superstar Shohei Ohtani and Mike Trout, the Angels haven’t had a winning season since 2015 and they haven’t made the playoffs since 2014.

Ohtani signed a heavily deferred 10-year, $700-million deal with the Dodgers over the winter, ending his six-year run with the Angels.

When asked if the Angels were willing to meet that price, Moreno said: “No.”

Moreno, however, would not say whether he believed the Angels had a chance to keep Ohtani at the various points when they made the decision not to trade him. The Angels could have traded Ohtani at the 2022 trade deadline, during the following offseason, or at the 2023 deadline.

“From a fan perspective, they pay for tickets and watch the games and listen to the games, this is a special guy,” Moreno said. “I’d like to see him play. We’re in the entertainment business. We made a decision, a group decision, that the best thing was to keep him and make a run.”

The Angels played better through late July last summer and were as close as three games from a playoff spot when they decided to add several players — bringing the projected payroll above the luxury tax threshold — in an effort to make the postseason.

Instead, they started August by losing seven games in a row, and by the end of the month they were out of the race. The Angels then placed seven players on waivers in an effort to get back under the threshold, eventually finishing less than $30,000 below the $233 million threshold.

This winter, with Ohtani gone, they have not even approached last year’s payroll. According to FanGraphs, the Angels are currently set to have a payroll of about $188 million, for purposes of the luxury tax.

Moreno said the plan was to “set the budget lower. … I’m not going to spend money just to show that we’re going to spend money unless it’s going to substantially change the team.”

Moreno said he’s encouraged by the potential of young players like catcher Logan O’Hoppe, shortstop Zach Neto, first baseman Nolan Schanuel.

“I am in it because I believe we can build a team to win,” he said.

Moreno also addressed the failed attempts to reach a development deal with the city of Anaheim regarding Angel Stadium. In 2022, the Angels had a plan to purchase the ballpark from the city in exchange for the right to develop the surrounding area. The agreement fell through when Anaheim mayor Harry Sidhu became embroiled in a corruption scandal.

Now, Moreno said there are no current talks about reviving that deal, with no expectation that it would be revisited.

“Right now I’d say no,” Moreno said. “I don’t like the word never. Right now I don’t believe (Anaheim officials) have an appetite for it.”

The Angels currently have a lease through 2029 at Angel Stadium, with three-year options that run through 2038. Asked if he can forecast what will happen then, Moreno said: “Do you know where you’re going to be in 2038? Do you know how old I am? This year I’ll be 78. That’s a long time.”

The Angels are, however, proceeding with plans to make upgrades to their spring training home in Tempe. Moreno said the practice fields and training facilities will undergo renovations starting at the end of this spring. Improvements to Tempe Diablo Stadium could begin next year, to be completed in time for spring training 2026, Moreno said.

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moreno said the plan was to “set the budget lower. … I’m not going to spend money just to show that we’re going to spend money unless it’s going to substantially change the team.”

I'm okay with this approach.  I think this is a HUGE change in philosophy from Moreno. 

Keep drafting and developing talent.  Add when the player can have an impact without subtracting from the prospect pool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, T.G. said:

Moreno said the plan was to “set the budget lower. … I’m not going to spend money just to show that we’re going to spend money unless it’s going to substantially change the team.”

I'm okay with this approach.  I think this is a HUGE change in philosophy from Moreno. 

Keep drafting and developing talent.  Add when the player can have an impact without subtracting from the prospect pool. 

This isn't a huge change at all.  He's said things like this all along. Won't go over budget unless it's for "the right guy," etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

This isn't a huge change at all.  He's said things like this all along. Won't go over budget unless it's for "the right guy," etc.

Well, I took it to mean they're not going to sign someone like Bellinger... which is fine by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jsnpritchett said:

"Moreno said the plan was to “set the budget lower. … I’m not going to spend money just to show that we’re going to spend money unless it’s going to substantially change the team.”

So, what you see right now is what you get, basically.

We’ll see what the budget is once we hit the start of the season and whether they made any more moves.

But if the payroll is anywhere near what it’s at right now, Perry deserves a ton of scrutiny for his allocation of resources.

If you have this many holes on the roster, you can’t be spending $8M on García, Cimber, Cisnero, Plesac, and Kolarek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

Right, I agree--but that's not a huge change.

It's a big change to me.  I think if Moreno had this mind set a while back, he wouldn't have signed Rendon.  We can just agree to disagree.  I'm not going to go back and forth on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fullmer17 said:

Jesus, this sucks. Lowered payroll, kept Ohtani for “fan entertainment” and there’s no ballpark plan. Why is he keeping the team then? There is no plan.

He doesn't seem to have a long term plan for anything.  I think he's just a bored, rich old man that wouldn't know what to do with himself if he actually sold the team.  His response about the stadium seems to coincide with this, which was practically "I'll probably be dead in 2038, who cares?"

It's funny that he's so big on selling "entertainment", yet winning is likely the biggest part of a team being interesting and drawing new fans.  Entertainment for him is a splashy name, not an actual good baseball team.  This is the entire root of the franchise's problems. 

He's had two all-time, HOF level players fall into his lap and has zilch to show for it.  Garbage, penny pinching player development, continually a garbage tier farm system.  A lot of people are huffing the hype pipe on Schanuel, Neto, and O'Hoppe, but these are more complementary pieces, not guys you build a team around.

Sorry to be such a downer, but man this a dark time for Angels fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, T.G. said:

The narrative that Arte doesn't have a plan is funny to me.  We don't know what the plan is and so fans assume he doesn't have one.

I agree with you technically.  I don’t think anybody can certainly conclude that he has no plan.  But he is being somewhat foolish if he fails to see how important it is for him to provide to the fans some sense that he is competent and capable of leading the organization.

He doesn’t seem to be doing anything to breed optimism that HE is the right owner going forward.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, T.G. said:

The narrative that Arte doesn't have a plan is funny to me.  We don't know what the plan is and so fans assume he doesn't have one.

Since Stoneman left, the only discernible plan I can make out has been whim signings of shiny toy FA’s, with a lack of commitment to development, at least until recently with Perry. You’re welcome to educate me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

I agree with you technically.  I don’t think anybody can certainly conclude that he has no plan.  But he is being somewhat foolish if he fails to see how important it is for him to provide to the fans some sense that he is competent and capable of leading the organization.

He doesn’t seem to be doing anything to breed optimism that HE is the right owner going forward.

 

Your perspective is very different from most Angel fans.  AW is home of fans who think differently than most fans.  Most fans, don't give a rip about a plan.  We're (AW) in the minority.  You see him not sharing his plan as foolish, but in reality - most fans probably don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMVol said:

Since Stoneman left, the only discernible plan I can make out has been whim signings of shiny toy FA’s, with a lack of commitment to development, at least until recently with Perry. You’re welcome to educate me otherwise.

I'm not here to educate you.  I don't know what the plan is.  I just find it funny that people assume there isn't one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...