Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

The shift has ruined Pujols


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, floplag said:

There are 32 teams in mlb, By this standard there are exactly 10 1B players in all of MLB that are anything more than role players, 6 that are considered good players, and all of 2 that qualify as stars. 

Not sure where you are getting your numbers. Here's a link to Fangraph's position player WAR leaderboard. >2.0 is more than a role player. 72 players meet that threshold and there is still more than 1/4 of a season left. There are currently 95 guys on pace to cross this threshold. 

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=21,d&page=3_30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eaterfan said:

Not sure where you are getting your numbers. Here's a link to Fangraph's position player WAR leaderboard. >2.0 is more than a role player. 72 players meet that threshold and there is still more than 1/4 of a season left. There are currently 95 guys on pace to cross this threshold. 

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=21,d&page=3_30

I pulled them right off ESPN sortable stats for qualified players at 1B in MLB.  Based on that list, sorted by WAR, Pujols is currently 24 out of 40.   A drop from previous but very much in the middle of the pack

Clicking on your link took me to all players, how does WAR at 3B factor into 1B replacement option?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, floplag said:

I pulled them right off ESPN sortable stats for qualified players at 1B in MLB.  Based on that list, sorted by WAR, Pujols is currently 24 out of 40.   A drop from previous but very much in the middle of the pack

Clicking on your link took me to all players, how does WAR at 3B factor into 1B replacement option?  

Oh. I thought you were talking about all the players. But I already posted Fangraph's leaderboard for 1B. He ranks 22 of 27 qualified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eaterfan said:

Oh. I thought you were talking about all the players. But I already posted Fangraph's leaderboard for 1B. He ranks 22 of 27 qualified.

Fangraphs has it different than ESPN, interesting. 
In fact i just looked and the numbers dont even match.  ESPN has him at 0.7 fangraphs at 0.0?  how is that possible?
Something is amiss there simply cannot be that kind of discrepancy.   Literally none of the numbers for anyone match. 

Interestingly enough by the anyone under 2 is just a role players or average major league scale, there are even fewer on fangpphs than espn.  FG has a total of 8 over 2 and only 2 above 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, m0nkey said:

ESPN could be using BBreference WAR, which has him at 0.7

How can different places use the same state and have a variance?  that makes no sense.  I knew different places had different stats but isnt WAR a standard?  what am i missing here?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, eaterfan said:

The shift can't defense a walk. Pujols BB% has decreased from 14.7% to 4.4% this season.

If Pujols were walking at a 10% clip his OBP would be around a reasonable .340

Which would make his line basically the same as Upton’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shift has ruined many of baseball player....players now a days (for the most part) are pull happy home run hitters.  Gone are the days of hitting the ball the opposite way or heck...how about a bunt up the line.  

Cole drilled a ball to LC field last night that was caught for an out....I was happy.  He drove the ball to LCF.  We need more of that, and less pull happy crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I think is amazing is his belief that he’d hit .290/.300 if the shift was deemed illegal. I’m now in favor of making the shift illegal so Albert has one less excuse once he goes from .255 to .265.

Also, it’s somewhat disappointing that he isn’t concerned with attempting to change his approach. He’d rather just stay the course doing the same thing instead of potentially adding more benefit to the team by trying something new (specifically altering the launch angle). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, floplag said:

How can different places use the same state and have a variance?  that makes no sense.  I knew different places had different stats but isnt WAR a standard?  what am i missing here?

 

WAR is more of a construct. It's simply hitting runs above average + defensive runs above average + base running runs above average + replacement level (positional adjustment x games played). Fangraphs and Baseball reference use different inputs. There isn't much debate around offense so those numbers should be close, as should the replacement level / positional adjustment. Where there is a lot of difference is in the defensive component, where fWar and rWar use different defensive stats for this input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Angelsjunky said:

 

As @Kevinb pointed out, 0 WAR is not "average." It is replacement level - a scrub - someone who can easily be replaced. 

floplag, paying Paul McAnulty $27 million a year is a problem. Change the name to someone who was once great and somehow it seems more palatable. I guess. 

According to Fangraphs:

0-1 WAR Scrub

1-2 WAR Role Player

2-3 WAR Solid Player

3-4 WAR Good Player

4-5 WAR All-Star

5-6 WAR Superstar

6+ WAR MVP

Albert Pujols, year by year:

2001: MVP

2002: Superstar

2003-10: MVP

2011: All-Star

Angels career begins:

2012: Good Player

2013: Scrub

2014: Solid Player

2015: Role Player

2016: Scrub

2017: Scrub

2018: Scrub

So step back and look at what the Angels have gotten out of Pujols: One year as each a Good, Solid, and Role Player, and four years as a Scrub.  Or 6.9 fWAR over 7 years, so about an average of 1 WAR per year.

Tell me again that he's not under-performing. The dude is an absolute disaster. And yes, contract matters.

But but but... 3 million fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

WAR is more of a construct. It's simply hitting runs above average + defensive runs above average + base running runs above average + replacement level (positional adjustment x games played). Fangraphs and Baseball reference use different inputs. There isn't much debate around offense so those numbers should be close, as should the replacement level / positional adjustment. Where there is a lot of difference is in the defensive component, where fWar and rWar use different defensive stats for this input.

can you please explain this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Lou said:

can you please explain this?

Fangraphs uses Ultimate Zone Rating for its defensive component while Baseball Reference uses Defensive Runs Saved. Subjectively I feel like UZR gives a bit more credit for making more difficult plays while DRS gives more credit for making more plays.

BRef also gives some credit for things like runs / rbis / and saves while using using runs allowed for rating pitchers. Because of this Im not a fan of their version of the stat because it fails as an accounting ledger (which is what fWar generally tries to be).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ohtani&Trout said:

It seems pretty obvious from those quotes that he plans on playing until his contract expires. Hopefully the new manager benches his ass to speed up this process.

If someone paid me $30 million a year to have dugout seats to every Angels game then I sure as hell wouldn't retire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, eaterfan said:

If someone paid me $30 million a year to have dugout seats to every Angels game then I sure as hell wouldn't retire.

I don't think he's playing primarily because of the money (though clearly a factor). I think he's primarily in it to chase records. That clearly means a lot to him. He wants to pad his HR, RBI, hit, doubles, etc. etc. totals and finish ahead of as many players who are currently ahead of him as he can.  He can't do any of that if he's on the bench. ;)

I love in particular how he says he doesn't want to play to embarrass himself. But that's exactly what he's been doing for a while now and he knows it. He's a shell of what he used to be and is one of the worst players in the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

Fangraphs uses Ultimate Zone Rating for its defensive component while Baseball Reference uses Defensive Runs Saved. Subjectively I feel like UZR gives a bit more credit for making more difficult plays while DRS gives more credit for making more plays.

BRef also gives some credit for things like runs / rbis / and saves while using using runs allowed for rating pitchers. Because of this Im not a fan of their version of the stat because it fails as an accounting ledger (which is what fWar generally tries to be).

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how they tried to give Albert a little pick me up by saying how many hard hit outs he's made. LOL. The reason other players use that for confidence going forward is that the thinking is it will all even out in the future whereas with Pujols he's the slowest runner in MLB and walks down the line so those are 100% sure to still be outs in the future. In other words it's not supposed to even out because he is one of the few players that hard hits are still easy outs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Angelsfan1984 said:

Albert Pujols said he'll know when to retire.

Pujols is under contract through 2021 but insisted that money won't be a factor in whether he continues playing. "The day that I feel like I can't compete in this game anymore, it doesn't matter how much money I'm going to leave on the table," said the former MVP. "To embarrass yourself and not be able to compete—dude, that's not me."
 
The end may actually be coming...

Saying it is one thing. Actually leaving that much cash on the table is quite another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...