Supreme Court decision of the day

[Jason]

19 minutes ago, St1ck said:

The entire thing is a disaster waiting to happen. You don't even have to be one of the parties involved to place a lawsuit. So if I knew my neighbor drove someone to get an abortion I can sue them in and if I win get rewarded $10,000 and he has to pay my legal fees. If he wins he still has to pay his own legal fees. 

Yeah that sounds dumb 

[Jason]

So I just read up on this decision on the Texas law and the only thing they denied was an emergency stay. They didn't actually rule on the appeal of the case. This one is far from over. 

[Taylor]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

Yeah that sounds dumb 

Also, most women don't even know they're pregnant at 6 weeks. 

[Jason]

11 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Also, most women don't even know they're pregnant at 6 weeks. 

They should suspect it if they aren’t on birth control and are given a cream pie 

[Jason]

1 hour ago, cals said:

When you're feeding Tdawg do you ever give him a cream pie? 

[tdawg87]

15 minutes ago, Jason said:

When you're feeding Tdawg do you ever give him a cream pie? 

That's disgusting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes.

[Rico]

5 hours ago, Kotchman said:

What choice did the baby get?  The baby is the one that gets butchered 

There is no baby.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Rico said:

There is no baby.

There is no Dana, only Zuul

[St1ck]

3 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

There is no Dana, only Zuul

What a lovely singing voice you must have.

[Blarg]

4 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

You need to flip flop those titles. 

[tdawg87]

29 minutes ago, Blarg said:

You need to flip flop those titles. 

I don't think you understand that picture.

[UndertheHalo]

It’s going to be very funny when fucking Breyer drops dead sitting on the court after the midterms and the Republicans are back in control of Congress.  

[Lhalo]

58 minutes ago, Rico said:

There is no baby.

There would be if the forceps and vacuum didn’t go up the whore’s pussy. 

[AngelsLakersFan]

On 9/2/2021 at 7:04 AM, St1ck said:

The entire thing is a disaster waiting to happen. You don't even have to be one of the parties involved to place a lawsuit. So if I knew my neighbor drove someone to get an abortion I can sue them in and if I win get rewarded $10,000 and he has to pay my legal fees. If he wins he still has to pay his own legal fees. 

It seems like an awfully dangerous precedent to set regardless of your view on abortion. If it stands Im sure we will see plenty more similar laws passed giving people standing to sue individuals and businesses over all sorts of issues, while taking the government out of the equation. 

I'm no legal expert but this same logic can easily be used to effectively strike down the second amendment. It doesn't feel like much of a stretch to see it applied to the free practice of religion as well. 

[St1ck]

10 minutes ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

It seems like an awfully dangerous precedent to set regardless of your view on abortion. If it stands Im sure we will see plenty more similar laws passed giving people standing to sue individuals and businesses over all sorts of issues, while taking the government out of the equation. 

I'm no legal expert but this same logic can easily be used to effectively strike down the second amendment. It doesn't feel like much of a stretch to see it applied to the free practice of religion as well. 

That pretty much sums it up. 

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

It seems like an awfully dangerous precedent to set regardless of your view on abortion. If it stands Im sure we will see plenty more similar laws passed giving people standing to sue individuals and businesses over all sorts of issues, while taking the government out of the equation. 

I'm no legal expert but this same logic can easily be used to effectively strike down the second amendment. It doesn't feel like much of a stretch to see it applied to the free practice of religion as well. 

It's a zero-sum game for the radical anti-abortion crowd. They think preventing just one abortion justifies whatever means necessary.

[Jay]

Abortion doesn't affect me.

[mtangelsfan]

15 hours ago, Taylor said:

It's a zero-sum game for the radical anti-abortion crowd. They think preventing just one abortion justifies whatever means necessary.

Where is your line as to where a position turns radical on this topic?

[Taylor]

8 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

Where is your line as to where a position turns radical on this topic?

I'm all for common-sense abortion laws that make it incredibly difficult to obtain one in the latter half of pregnancy. Finding loopholes in the system to eliminate abortion before most women even know they're pregnant is a gigantic leap across the line.

My view on abortion has evolved over the years. I used to be in the "stop all abortions at all costs" camp because I believed that was the only legitimate Christian stance on the issue. But now I've come to see that it's more nuanced, more robust. Christians need to stop opposing abortion while also opposing addressing the systems of poverty and inequality that result in unplanned pregnancies and children who are allowed life but then neglected and abused. At the same time, liberals need to stop taking advantage of minority communities and treating abortion like it's a routine medical procedure. 

[mtangelsfan]

Thanks for the reply Taylor.

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

Thanks for the reply Taylor.

Of course. I try to always reply to you. You're someone who converses in good faith, and I think we have a lot more similarities than differences. The similarities just aren't as fun to discuss.

[tdawg87]

Get a room.

[tdawg87]

Film it tho.

[Taylor]

tdawg'd

[cysomeawfulpitcher]

Carlin still based as ever.  RIP Rufus.