Hillary Hates Taxes and other Hillaryous things

[nate]

Just now, mtangelsfan said:

You didn't respond at all to my point. Is truth dependent on who gives it?

So you are saying he didn't leak credit card numbers, social security numbers and other information?  Or just that isn't against the law?

[nate]

And to your point, I think it matters a great deal when the person delivering it has an agenda.

[mtangelsfan]

Come on.  I'm saying that as far as what he has on Hillary (if it is verifiable) it doesn't matter what he's done.  Truth is truth.

As far as the other stuff, I think he is very guilty.

[mtangelsfan]

So the same information delivered by another source would be more relevant to you?  Even if it is exactly the same information?

That is not rational at all.

[nate]

1 minute ago, mtangelsfan said:

Come on.  I'm saying that as far as what he has on Hillary (if it is verifiable) it doesn't matter what he's done.  Truth is truth.

As far as the other stuff, I think he is very guilty.

We only get what he gives us.  We don't know what he is leaving out.  You can easily frame something in a way that is more damning by omitting information just as much as you can by including it.

Why has he not released anything on Trump?  Are we all to be so naive that nothing has been hacked on the Trump side?

[nate]

Just now, mtangelsfan said:

So the same information delivered by another source would be more relevant to you?  Even if it is exactly the same information?

That is not rational at all.

Yes, a source that is held up by rules of integrity and due process.

[mtangelsfan]

We are miles apart on this one my friend.  As far as Trump, isn't there enough out there already?  Every time he opens his mouth he shows how horrible a person, and candidate he is.

[mtangelsfan]

2 minutes ago, nate said:

Yes, a source that is held up by rules of integrity and due process.

Then we might as well stop this conversation because what you are saying is simply not logical.  It is kind of like this:

 

[nate]

When someone is accused of a crime and goes to trial there is discover, due process, and the laws compel all information to be shared with the public.

Assange can just pick and choose what he wants and who he wants to target and use it to affect the outcome of a presidential election.  It is one of the saddest events in the history of this country.

[arch stanton]

I tend to agree with Nate about this. There's nothing noble or altruistic about this. It's a narcissist cherry picking information that isn't his to divulge for his own personal agenda and profit. If he was trying to expose criminal activity for the sake of justice he would have released everything he has a long time ago.

[Jason]

33 minutes ago, nate said:

We only get what he gives us.  We don't know what he is leaving out.  You can easily frame something in a way that is more damning by omitting information just as much as you can by including it.

Why has he not released anything on Trump?  Are we all to be so naive that nothing has been hacked on the Trump side?

Trump doesn't need assistance in derailing his presidential efforts. 

[TobiasFunke]

Unfortunately in an age of withholding information and political shadiness, I'll take what I can get when it comes to leaked information.

[Spirit]

Batman

     * A hero to the society?  Righting wrongs and dispensing justice when government or law enforcement will not or cannot?

     * A vigilante anarchist who operates outside the laws of society to impose his own form of justice based upon what he himself views as being right or wrong?

 

 

Edited September 7, 2016 by Geoff

[nate]

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/09/06/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-and-why-media-are-failing/B6FDRApMzjVJ3NciRNPblK/story.html?event=event25

[mtangelsfan]

14 minutes ago, nate said:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/09/06/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-and-why-media-are-failing/B6FDRApMzjVJ3NciRNPblK/story.html?event=event25

"What’s so strange about this narrative, however, is that even after being placed under the most intense media microscope in modern political history, we can say with some assuredness that the Clintons aren’t corrupt."

Bwa ha ha ha ha

[NJHalo]

3 hours ago, mtangelsfan said:

Has he been proven to be guilty?  Let me know when he is. Although he is guilty of many things already.

However, and this is what is important, if what he has to share is true, then does it really matter who the messenger is?

You are a pretty rational guy, I cannot believe it is your stance that truth depends on the messenger.

[gotbeer]

Julian Assange: 'We Have Released Thousands of Cables Where Clinton Herself Has Used a 'C' in Brackets'

 

Remember, when marking your paragraphs.  Mark the third one 'C' to keep it in alphabetical order. 

[gotbeer]

Man, you think this presidential race can't deliver any more.  And they just continue to one up each other.

Bill Clinton Throws an $18 Million Curveball Into the Trump University Mess

 

[Spirit]

Good luck, 'murica

 

 

 

[nate]

Now wikileaks if fabricating information.

Also, she was in the UN at that time lol.

[gotbeer]

I don't get it.  Earpieces are kind of important at the UN.  Unless it's code for vagina or something.

[gotbeer]

New Email Release Shows Colin Powell Advised Clinton on How to 'Get Around' State Department Security with Private Email

[nate]

state.goy?  it should be state.gov

[Taylor]

12 hours ago, gotbeer said:

New Email Release Shows Colin Powell Advised Clinton on How to 'Get Around' State Department Security with Private Email

Crooked Colin

[Glen]

12 hours ago, nate said:

state.goy?  it should be state.gov

It's Jewish email. 

Hakuna matata, bitches!