Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Sandoval? What to do with him?


Recommended Posts

he leads the league in bb/9.  don't have to go much further than that.  

he's got a mediocre fastball but so do a lot of guys.  His slider and change are plus.  But he can't just completely not throw his fastball for strikes.  

I have no idea if any of his struggles are between his ears but more strikes will bring him more success.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

I think the whole "trust your stuff" mantra is mostly bullshit.

 

I think the issue isn't a lack of confidence in stuff, but a flat out inability to throw the ball in the strike zone at will. I'm sure he's trying to throw strikes, he just can't.

I hope this isn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Vlad27Trout27 said:

it's going to be his ability to control/command the strike zone. If he's going to be walking 3 to 5 guys per start, its going to be a struggle.

 

The stuff is still good, actually looks better than last year. The command/control not so much. 

 

 Personally I think he just needs to slow down. take a breath, pause beacuase it looks to me like he starts to rush and be out of sync with his mechanics.

Both Canning and him this is going to be a prove it type of year. 

Do you think it's the pitch clock?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fan_since79 said:

LOL 

You can laugh old man, but if your ERA is 9% better than league average over the course of your career then you are MUCH better than that record. I know you don’t get it and that’s ok. Let the rational people talk this one out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

I get that win/loss record is not a great indicator of pitching success but 18-40 is enough to say that he hasn't been good. 

 

Just now, Stradling said:

You can laugh old man, but if your ERA is 9% better than league average over the course of your career then you are MUCH better than that record. I know you don’t get it and that’s ok. Let the rational people talk this one out. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stradling said:

You can laugh old man, but if your ERA is 9% better than league average over the course of your career then you are MUCH better than that record. I know you don’t get it and that’s ok. Let the rational people talk this one out. 

Patrick Sandoval - Stats - Pitching | FanGraphs Baseball

Maybe "that bad" is a bit much but he is just mediocre. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...