Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Perry is a very not good GM


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Blarg said:

We are building rosters, not nuclear warheads.

Physicists have stiudied baseball since, oh, the 1940’s or earlier. TrackMan, Pitch F/X, StatCast, all of these ways of tracking pitching data were developed using physics. It would make sense for baseball teams to employ people who not only understand and use that data, but can also develop their own proprietary ways of measuring pitcher and batter data. Teams employ baseball scientists. They also consult with actual astrophysicists. The sweet spot on a bat, the way a type of pitch moves, all of that is physics. When the AL and NL were separate entities, the each employed a league physicist in the 90’s. I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the necessity for a knowledge of physics in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jeremiah said:

Physicists have stiudied baseball since, oh, the 1940’s or earlier. TrackMan, Pitch F/X, StatCast, all of these ways of tracking pitching data were developed using physics. It would make sense for baseball teams to employ people who not only understand and use that data, but can also develop their own proprietary ways of measuring pitcher and batter data. Teams employ baseball scientists. They also consult with actual astrophysicists. The sweet spot on a bat, the way a type of pitch moves, all of that is physics. When the AL and NL were separate entities, the each employed a league physicist in the 90’s. I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the necessity for a knowledge of physics in baseball.

Yeah you're absolutely right.

I know for a fact that teams right now are looking at stuff like the degrees and angles a pitcher's arm moves at, the degrees and angles a batter's bat approaches the plate, and I'm sure much more.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, BTH said:

I think he'll make it to the end of the season at least, simply because they don't have an obvious interim GM candidate.

They remain the only team in MLB without an assistant GM, who would be the natural candidate for interim GM.

They have an assistant GM...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

They have an assistant GM...

they do? That's news to me.

They have special assistants to the GM, which is a completely different role than Assistant GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jeremiah said:

Physicists have stiudied baseball since, oh, the 1940’s or earlier. TrackMan, Pitch F/X, StatCast, all of these ways of tracking pitching data were developed using physics. It would make sense for baseball teams to employ people who not only understand and use that data, but can also develop their own proprietary ways of measuring pitcher and batter data. Teams employ baseball scientists. They also consult with actual astrophysicists. The sweet spot on a bat, the way a type of pitch moves, all of that is physics. When the AL and NL were separate entities, the each employed a league physicist in the 90’s. I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the necessity for a knowledge of physics in baseball.

They are building a roster, not a TrackMan. It doesn't require a physicist to read the data. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Blarg said:

They are building a roster, not a TrackMan. It doesn't require a physicist to read the data. 

Actually, they’re probably building something similar, and constantly updating it with whatever their proprietary database has collected. Smart teams are doing that anyway, and they guard those databases fiercely. The Cardinals got into trouble a few years ago for hacking into HOU’s database. It sounds like you think it’s all a joke, but science is more and more involved in player development and roster construction every year. People bring up the Phillies as an example of a good organization. Dave Dombrowski may not be a physicist, but his assistant GM has two science degrees, and heads their actual R&D department. The Phillies call their proprietary database “Rocky,” btw. You can bet other orgs have similar FO structures. You can yell at the clouds all you want, but teams need to have a good working knowledge of how to collect, interpret, and communicate this data for the long-term success of their team. Having people on staff with a good grasp of physics is pretty essential now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, floplag said:

How many GMs and or Managers do we need to go thru before we realize none of them were the problem?

Most already realize they aren’t the problem.

But just because they haven’t been the problem doesn’t mean they aren’t a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...