Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

MLB Umpires Missed 34,294 Ball-Strike Calls in 2018.


Chuck

Recommended Posts

That sounds like a lot but there's a lot of pitches thrown in a season.  I'm going to assume an average of 135 per team per game which is 270 a game.  15 games per day of season*162 days of season*270='s 656,100 pitches in a season.  34,294/656,100 ='s ~.052 or 5.2%.   Now that's just all pitches.  As Dochalo mentioned, I don't know how many actually required ball/strike calls because there are a significant number of balls that are hit or swung on and missed that are counted as automatic strikes and doesn't require judgement.  Also many of the pitches that are called strikes are very obvious or balls that hit the dirt.  I'm very interested in how umps do on "borderline" pitches. I'm pretty sure the missed ratio is a lot higher around those pitches and that "robot" umps will definitely get a higher percentage right. 

 

EDIT: Just skimmed the article, an interesting read and they break down their data a bit more but the good ones have an error rate around 9% and the bad ones average 14% which is a bit higher than my estimates but not by very much.  But again these figures are for all calls and not just borderline.  However, the umps as a whole are improving and are not as afraid of calling a 3rd strike when a hitter is taking in years past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dochalo said:

I wonder what the ratio of bad calls would look like if the eliminated obvious strikes and balls from the denominator.  Say those appropriately called and more than a ball or so from the edge.  

Exactly. How many of these pitches are subjective? There isn’t really an excuse for missing a “true” ball. But a ball on the outer edge of the plate where half of us see as a ball and half of us see as a strike is part of the beauty of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if bias towards the batter or pitcher increases the blown call rate.  For instance the rumor was that Greg Maddox used to get several balls called strikes.  I remember him being visibly upset when he pitched against the Angel's with AL umps.

 

Another thing, these numbers are horrible,  even for the better umps.  In the real world you would be fired for an 8% error rate.  

Maybe the 2nd base ump should call balls and strikes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WeaverFever said:

Exactly. How many of these pitches are subjective? There isn’t really an excuse for missing a “true” ball. But a ball on the outer edge of the plate where half of us see as a ball and half of us see as a strike is part of the beauty of the game. 

Agree. The number of truly bad ball/strike calls in a game is minimal. I am sure there are many games where umps don't make any truly bad calls at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If im reading this correctly, were talking about 4 million pitches, over 11 years, resulting in about 32K errors, or less than 1%. Hardly a horrendous value considering that means they get about 99% right.
Some of them are obviously egregiously bad, i get it, which is why i think the whole "cant challenge balls and strikes" is the problem.  Teams should be able to challenge those like any other call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, floplag said:

If im reading this correctly, were talking about 4 million pitches, over 11 years, resulting in about 32K errors, or less than 1%. Hardly a horrendous value considering that means they get about 99% right.
Some of them are obviously egregiously bad, i get it, which is why i think the whole "cant challenge balls and strikes" is the problem.  Teams should be able to challenge those like any other call.

you're not reading it correctly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dochalo said:

you're not reading it correctly.  

 

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

No, we're talking about one year. 2018.

Re-read, honest mistake, the first paragraph says...
This article is based on 11 seasons of Major League Baseball data, almost four million pitches culled and analyzed over two months by Boston University Master Lecturer Mark T. Williams and a team of graduate students at the Questrom School of Business experienced in data mining, analytics, and statistics.

Then later is specific in 2018 there was about 1.6 misses per inning.   My mistake. 

Still though considering most innings have 10-20 pitches thrown, were still talking less than 10%, but i must agree that 10% assuming my very quick math is correct, is too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...