Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

Who do you think will have the better career? Harper or Trout?


Recommended Posts

Chuck, don't blame me for the Angels sucking.

 

As for the question, who knows. It will be fun to watch both. I'd guess that Harper will be a better pure hitter, with a higher OBP and SLG, but that Trout will be a better defensive player and baserunner and perhaps overall similar in value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Bryce Harper and manny manchado are both very over hyped by espn.

Who would take Harper and manchado 2and 3 in a draft?????

If anything I would take puig over both of those guys

 

Harper and Machado are both excellent young players with great long-term prospects - don't forget that they're both still only 21, are above average players in the major leagues at an age when most players are in the low minors. Dave Cameron has them both in the top 10 of his trade value series.

 

Of course neither are nearly as good as Trout and at this point, chances are they'll never be as good as Trout. But I still think Harper in particular will have some great years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harper and Machado are both excellent young players with great long-term prospects - don't forget that they're both still only 21, are above average players in the major leagues at an age when most players are in the low minors. Dave Cameron has them both in the top 10 of his trade value series.

Of course neither are nearly as good as Trout and at this point, chances are they'll never be as good as Trout. But I still think Harper in particular will have some great years.

Neither are heading into the right direction, that's what I want to say.

So according to this list Clayton kersaw is not top 50?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither are heading into the right direction, that's what I want to say.

So according to this list Clayton kersaw is not top 50?

Kershaw makes a lot of money and has a lot of opt outs. If he pitches well he can opt out abd if he doesn't then the Dodgers are stuck. Plus pitchers get injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kershaw makes a lot of money and has a lot of opt outs. If he pitches well he can opt out abd if he doesn't then the Dodgers are stuck. Plus pitchers get injured.

I think he has one opt out after year 5, and some of the pitchers on that list has tommy john already...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...