Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Gunfire at Oregon High School


Recommended Posts

Ahhh, the good old days.

 

September 11, 1909: Gravette, Arkansas, John Butram, an unruly student at the Bear Hollow School announced to his fellow students that school is canceled. The teacher, A. T. Kelly insisted that the day's lesson was not over. Butram then drew a knife on his teacher, so the teacher drew his gun and shot him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nate, don't try and be too smart in a subject you are not too smart about. Regurgitating someone else's post doesn't create a point of your own.

 

The greatest amount of human destruction on a school campus was one disgruntled clerk that decided to place dynamite under the premises. The death toll would have doubled or tripled if his second cache of explosions had triggered.

 

There was no internet back then, no CNN getting their facts wrong with 24/7 coverage, there was no tweets or facebook pages updating the mood of the moment to keep the story alive. It happened, it was reported on in the paper and not even on a nationwide basis and went away from the publics conscious. No one felt compelled to rack up a similar death toll because the story wasn't sensationalized by politicians trying to keep their jobs.

 

Now, spin forward 100 years and you have at your fingertips a number that you can't even parse what happened in those individual events (whether the shooting involved victims or property) and spew it out like someone stumping for office and demanding the proliferation of guns be removed from society because that is the cause of this. Inanimate objects do not create death tolls.

 

Guns were easier to obtain 30-50-100 years ago and yet the number of shootings on campus per decade doesn't come close to the present. What changed, Nate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a reason people need AR15 rifles? Oh, that's right...it's their God given right to own them. Or so they say.

 

I have no need for an AR15 right now but I am considering adding one to my earthquake/disaster preparedness kit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nate, don't try and be too smart in a subject you are not too smart about. Regurgitating someone else's post doesn't create a point of your own.

 

The greatest amount of human destruction on a school campus was one disgruntled clerk that decided to place dynamite under the premises. The death toll would have doubled or tripled if his second cache of explosions had triggered.

 

There was no internet back then, no CNN getting their facts wrong with 24/7 coverage, there was no tweets or facebook pages updating the mood of the moment to keep the story alive. It happened, it was reported on in the paper and not even on a nationwide basis and went away from the publics conscious. No one felt compelled to rack up a similar death toll because the story wasn't sensationalized by politicians trying to keep their jobs.

 

Now, spin forward 100 years and you have at your fingertips a number that you can't even parse what happened in those individual events (whether the shooting involved victims or property) and spew it out like someone stumping for office and demanding the proliferation of guns be removed from society because that is the cause of this. Inanimate objects do not create death tolls.

 

Guns were easier to obtain 30-50-100 years ago and yet the number of shootings on campus per decade doesn't come close to the present. What changed, Nate?

 

Your last sentence is irrelevant.  There are millions more guns now than there were 30-50-100 years ago.  All because the US is still in the stone age when it comes to gun laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way the whole guns for protection shit that you all regurgitate every time this comes up isn't supported by facts either.

 

Even though the police force was more sparse, and much of the country was lawless, there are more gun deaths per capita now than there were when guns were easier to get.  There were also significantly less guns overall.  So more guns in the hands of civilians has lead to more gun deaths.  Imagine that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...