Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Minasian's Gambit


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Stradling said:

Again it’s not just a name gap. Giolito has an actual track record of being a 1 or 2 starter and Barria is a 6-7th starter/swing man. 

Giolito hasn't been a #1-2 starter in a couple years. Look at 2022-23: he's been a #3-4. That's better than Barria, although I think his track record is actually closer to a #4-5 -- he always seems under-appreciated and outperforms expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angelsjunky said:

I'm sorry, @mmc, but the endless rationalization of "made sense at the time" falls apart when the results are almost always bad. 

I just don't think there's ever a reason to trade prospects--even fringe ones--for replacement players. The definition of a replacement player is a guy that can be easily found in the high minors. Due to the Angels lack of depth, even those are hard to find. But they still have some options (e.g. Fletcher) that can equal the warm body on the field that Escobar has been.

I don't even know what point you're trying to make.  He said he didn't understand why we traded for Escobar so I explained it.  Whether you think it was any good or not is irrelevant, I said in another thread we should DFA the guy already.  I'm not naive enough to pretend I have no clue why they made the move though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mmc said:

He hasn't played because he sucks and has been worse than everyone anticipated.  But at the time we needed another 3B and we got one.  

If Perry knew he was going to get Moose the next day, would he have made the trade for Escobar? I don’t know but you have to wonder….I guess the original plan was to play Moose primarily at 1b and Escobar at 3b….In a perfect world, you get Moose for 3b and Cron for 1b in June….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DMVol said:

If Perry knew he was going to get Moose the next day, would he have made the trade for Escobar? I don’t know but you have to wonder….I guess the original plan was to play Moose primarily at 1b and Escobar at 3b….In a perfect world, you get Moose for 3b and Cron for 1b in June….

I don't see why not, they replaced different players on the roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Angelsjunky said:

I'm sorry, @mmc, but the endless rationalization of "made sense at the time" falls apart when the results are almost always bad. 

I just don't think there's ever a reason to trade prospects--even fringe ones--for replacement players. The definition of a replacement player is a guy that can be easily found in the high minors. Due to the Angels lack of depth, even those are hard to find. But they still have some options (e.g. Fletcher) that can equal the warm body on the field that Escobar has been.

I think Moose and Cron were worth trading prospects….Escobar hasn’t been…Grichuk, we’ll see….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMVol said:

Escobar has been exactly the same player he was with the Mets….stats are dead on the same…just not sure it was a good move regardless of who replaced who…

Don't think anyone is trying to say it was good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mmc said:

Don't think anyone is trying to say it was good

I guess my original point was although I might disagree with the “all in” plan, since that was the plan, I don’t think any of the deals were bad except Escobar…saying Escobar filled a need is true but you got the exact same guy he was with the Mets….just think Perry pulled the trigger too quickly (although we were pretty desperate)…it was obvious pretty quickly that it wasn’t a good idea….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jay said:

Yeah but you only get two months of Moose, Cron, Escobar and Grichuk. Then they're gone and you have no prospects.

Wasn’t debating the wisdom of the “all in” plan, just saying that, if that’s your plan, Moose and Cron have been pretty good pick ups…Escobar, not so much….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, DMVol said:

Wasn’t debating the wisdom of the “all in” plan, just saying that, if that’s your plan, Moose and Cron have been pretty good pick ups…Escobar, not so much….

Cron is 5 for 20 (all singles) since joining the Angels.  Grichuk is 5 for 19 with 1 HR.  Escobar has been an unmitigated disaster, as everyone seems to acknowledge.  Moustakas has been hitting pretty well recently.  He's the only one who's been a true plus overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

Cron is 5 for 20 (all singles) since joining the Angels.  Grichuk is 5 for 19 with 1 HR.  Escobar has been an unmitigated disaster, as everyone seems to acknowledge.  Moustakas has been hitting pretty well recently.  He's the only one who's been a true plus overall.

True, he hasn’t been great, although he has the MLB best hitting streak right now….More than anything, I think Cron and Moustakas have stabilized the corner INF spots, which have been a mess for the last two years…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMVol said:

True, he hasn’t been great, although he has the MLB best hitting streak right now….More than anything, I think Cron and Moustakas have stabilized the corner INF spots, which have been a mess for the last two years…

My point about Cron is that I'm just not sure he's really stabilized anything yet.  He's going out there every day, I guess, so if that's your definition of stability, then sure.  But he's not that good.  He's got negative fWAR and bWAR this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

My point about Cron is that I'm just not sure he's really stabilized anything yet.  He's going out there every day, I guess, so if that's your definition of stability, then sure.  But he's not that good.  He's got negative fWAR and bWAR this season.

Everything is relative, I guess. Compared to Walsh (and others) we’ve run out there in 22 and 23, I’ll take him right now…🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’re all disappointed and angry, justifiably so.  I recall even I got in spats during spring about the level of the team (looks like I was filled with caca).  One of the reasons I find this board a nice hobby is there’s people maybe smarter that me about baseball.  If my son had interest I’d tell him to read this board, that’s  the truth.

Edited by Revad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...