Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

New SCOTUS justice incoming


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, gotbeer said:

It's actually a pretty important question considering where the nation is headed.  

No it isn't. It was a trap question and she wasn't falling for it because she's not stupid. 

And where is the nation headed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

No it isn't. It was a trap question and she wasn't falling for it because she's not stupid. 

And where is the nation headed? 

It was a simple question that liberals can’t answer because they are fucked in the head. 

Edited by Lhalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

So why didn’t she say that?

What would the reaction have been to that answer?

You know I don't care much for the whole LGBTQ part of leftist politics, but I know that question was asked so no matter what she did, there would be backlash for it. She chose not to play. Best way to handle that IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

Ok but whomst the fuck asks a SCJ nominee to define what a woman is?

Ask stupid questions, get stupid answers.

It’s a stupid question because it’s the easiest question ever asked of a SCOTUS nominee. Lol that she couldn’t answer it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jason said:

It’s a stupid question because it’s the easiest question ever asked of a SCOTUS nominee. Lol that she couldn’t answer it

Do you think she doesn't know the answer?

This isn't the slam dunk you guys think it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

Of course she does but just like so many SJW type leftists she goes along with this nonsense 

You know, I'm not trying to pull a floplag here but I can't continue an argument over this. There's far more important things to talk about than a SJC nominee not properly defining the word "woman".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

It’s a stupid question because it’s the easiest question ever asked of a SCOTUS nominee. Lol that she couldn’t answer it

Apparently that question didn't come up in her prep.

Her instincts told her to dodge it and that was the best she could come up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...