Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

New SCOTUS justice incoming


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jars of Clay went up against the Vag Team.  Good stuff. 

And arch is right, monetize it.  The line of questioning was meant for fundraising and it is working. Even everyones favorite pedo Gaetz is cashing in and he didn't even question her. 

Your vag's will yeast up and you will move on to another long gripe of the day. Good luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Crampknees said:

Jars of Clay went up against the Vag Team.  Good stuff. 

And arch is right, monetize it.  The line of questioning was meant for fundraising and it is working. Even everyones favorite pedo Gaetz is cashing in and he didn't even question her. 

Your vag's will yeast up and you will move on to another long gripe of the day. Good luck. 

Congrats on supporting leniency for child porn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay far left commentators, enough complaining of the treatment Brown-Jackson is getting!

You obviously forgot your pathetic treatment of Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Hypocritical

And, the criticism of her has NOT been about personal stuff, only about her previous rulings.   Unlike the garbage treatment given to Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

At least stop being hypocrites!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Angel Oracle said:

Okay far left commentators, enough complaining of the treatment Brown-Jackson is getting!

You obviously forgot your pathetic treatment of Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Hypocritical

And, the criticism of her has NOT been about personal stuff, only about her previous rulings.   Unlike the garbage treatment given to Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

At least stop being hypocrites!

The media is stupid and so are SCOTUS nomination hearings. So much political grandstanding. The left and media will now shift all the SCOTUS attention to removing Thomas from the bench 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

Okay far left commentators, enough complaining of the treatment Brown-Jackson is getting!

You obviously forgot your pathetic treatment of Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Hypocritical

And, the criticism of her has NOT been about personal stuff, only about her previous rulings.   Unlike the garbage treatment given to Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

At least stop being hypocrites!

Based on made up Republican rules Amy Coney Barrett should have never have had a hearing that close to an election. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

Okay far left commentators, enough complaining of the treatment Brown-Jackson is getting!

You obviously forgot your pathetic treatment of Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Hypocritical

And, the criticism of her has NOT been about personal stuff, only about her previous rulings.   Unlike the garbage treatment given to Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

At least stop being hypocrites!

You really need to stop hanging around Brian and Chuck's Facebook.

No one here is "far left".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

You really need to stop hanging around Brian and Chuck's Facebook.

No one here is "far left".

The terms far left and far right are used to freely to describe those of opposing political ideologies. I would argue that someone who believes that a woman can have a cock or that a man can have a baby are in the extreme end of the spectrum. Just like the Q folks on the other end. Thankfully I don’t think anyone here believes that stuff, yet. 

Edited by Jason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

The terms far left and far right are used to freely to describe those of poppies it’s political ideologies. I would argue that someone who believes that a woman can have a cock or that a man can have a baby are in the extreme end of the spectrum. Just like the Q folks on the other end. Thankfully I don’t think anyone here believes that stuff, yet. 

So you don't support LGBTQ anything? I wouldn't call that "far left". It's the people on Twitter who REEEEE over pronouns who are in that boat. They're embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

So you don't support LGBTQ anything? I wouldn't call that "far left". It's the people on Twitter who REEEEE over pronouns who are in that boat. They're embarrassing.

I think they should have the same rights as everyone else. Trans women should not be allowed to compete in female sports. The pronoun folks are attempting to redefine language to fit their narrative and it’s stupid for them to expect others to play along. I have no issue with adults wanting to be transgender but I have serious issues with parents letting their young children do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

I think they should have the same rights as everyone else. Trans women should not be allowed to compete in female sports. The pronoun folks are attempting to redefine language to fit their narrative and it’s stupid for them to expect others to play along. I have no issue with adults wanting to be transgender but I have serious issues with parents letting their young children do it. 

Fair enough. I definitely agree on the sports part. That is such horseshit. You can be transgender but you can't change your genetic makeup. You're still, by biological standards, a man. And men fucking own women at sports. 

Imagine a 6'8 transgender "woman" in the WNBA. Fuck it'd be like prime LeBron against a special ed gym class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Fair enough. I definitely agree on the sports part. That is such horseshit. You can be transgender but you can't change your genetic makeup. You're still, by biological standards, a man. And men fucking own women at sports. 

Imagine a 6'8 transgender "woman" in the WNBA. Fuck it'd be like prime LeBron against a special ed gym class. 

This is the stuff I’m talking about. I have no issue with dudes who pound other dudes or women who scissor other women. Anyone who does this to children are abusing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jason said:

This is the stuff I’m talking about. I have no issue with dudes who pound other dudes or women who scissor other women. Anyone who does this to children are abusing them. 

Idk the gender stuff isn't a "choice". I hate that. I assume these people believe gays are born gay (which I believe as well), so why are their kids "choosing" who they want to be? Life isn't a fucking RPG character creation screen. It's more of the role playing BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2022 at 7:46 AM, tdawg87 said:

Fair enough. I definitely agree on the sports part. That is such horseshit. You can be transgender but you can't change your genetic makeup. You're still, by biological standards, a man. And men fucking own women at sports. 

Imagine a 6'8 transgender "woman" in the WNBA. Fuck it'd be like prime LeBron against a special ed gym class. 

Lia Thomas.

5C04299C-C5A9-4201-B161-CD3548E36A3F.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2022 at 9:46 AM, tdawg87 said:

Fair enough. I definitely agree on the sports part. That is such horseshit. You can be transgender but you can't change your genetic makeup. You're still, by biological standards, a man. And men fucking own women at sports. 

Imagine a 6'8 transgender "woman" in the WNBA. Fuck it'd be like prime LeBron against a special ed gym class. 

You’re at least half right. The gay comment is where you start to enter that third group. Gays have a choice of who they fuck just as much as trans have a choice of how they dress. Twenty years ago the opinion on gays was no different than your trans views now. Society has changed their view on gays and attempts to use false science to support their immortality. Society and the nation benefit when sexual deviants are properly identified as such. Doesn’t mean we stone them to death but we certainly should emphasize the unhealthy effects of deviant behavior on the nation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...