New SCOTUS justice incoming

[Jason]

15 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

If that's true, then absolutely. Where do you get that info from?

They asked questions about that so I assume she dealt with some. I’m guessing she’s one of these that believes restorative Justice is a good way for criminal Justice reform 

[Kotchman]

25 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

If that's true, then absolutely. Where do you get that info from?

Cruz had a chart with her major cases and light sentences. At the end of the day she’s probably not all that different than the majority of lib justices. They won so their pick. I’m Biden’s defense he’s not going to find a liberal judge that will publicly state women have a vagina , babies deserve to live, and is tough on crime. 

[tdawg87]

13 minutes ago, Jason said:

They asked questions about that so I assume she dealt with some. I’m guessing she’s one of these that believes restorative Justice is a good way for criminal Justice reform 

So no info?

[Lou]

8 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

So no info?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/24/hawkins-brown-jackson-pornography-sentence/

[tdawg87]

3 minutes ago, Lou said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/24/hawkins-brown-jackson-pornography-sentence/

Ahh look at that unbiased nature again!

So why aren't we talking about this instead of the definition of a woman?

[Lou]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

Ahh look at that unbiased nature again!

So why aren't we talking about this instead of the definition of a woman?

Are you drunk again?

[tdawg87]

6 minutes ago, Lou said:

Are you drunk again?

No I'm sober. 

[Lou]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

No I'm sober. 

Interesting

[Jason]

54 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

So no info?

Honestly, I haven’t paid that much attention to it. She will be confirmed so it’s a waste of my time. Her role as SCOTUS isn’t to sentence people so I don’t think it’s that relevant plus the facts of particular cases should be looked at before criticizing judgements. 

[St1ck]

1 hour ago, Angel Oracle said:

Shouldn’t some focus be back on her lenient history with child porn cases?

Let's do that. Feel free to let us know your opinion on that. 

[Lhalo]

[Angel Oracle]

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

If that's true, then absolutely. Where do you get that info from?

Ted Cruz had stats that he was presenting of child porn cases with what is the recommended penalty and what she ruled.   Usually it was less than the recommended penalty and sometimes a lot less.

[Angel Oracle]

10 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Let's do that. Feel free to let us know your opinion on that. 

Throw the book at them!

[Jason]

Speaking of women 

[St1ck]

5 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

Ted Cruz had stats that he was presenting of child porn cases with what is the recommended penalty and what she ruled.   Usually it was less than the recommended penalty and sometimes a lot less.

Can you share those stats?

[Lhalo]

31 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Can you share those stats?

This is a family site St1ck. 

[JarsOfClay]

2 hours ago, Angel Oracle said:

Shouldn’t some focus be back on her lenient history with child porn cases?

You do realize that was all theatre?

She doesn't have a lenient history on child porn cases. The Republicans didn't have any dirt on her, so the made this stupid allegation up. I'm guessing the Heritage Foundation sent out a mass email telling the Senators to focus on that. 

[JarsOfClay]

40 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

Ted Cruz had stats that he was presenting of child porn cases with what is the recommended penalty and what she ruled.   Usually it was less than the recommended penalty and sometimes a lot less.

The recommended penalty by the US government for which Ted Cruz is a part of and makes laws for recommended 5-12 years, she gave the guy 5 years, as recommended by the branch of government that Ted Cruz works for. If Ted Cruz thinks it's too lenient then he can write a law making the punishments more severe which he never did because he's just a performance artist who is perfectly fine with the current penalty.

[St1ck]

4 minutes ago, JarsOfClay said:

The recommended penalty by the US government for which Ted Cruz is a part of and makes laws for recommended 5-12 years, she gave the guy 5 years, as recommended by the branch of government that Ted Cruz works for. If Ted Cruz thinks it's too lenient then he can write a law making the punishments more severe which he never did because he's just a performance artist who is perfectly fine with the current penalty.

Yeah but he had a chart. You have to factor that in. 

[JarsOfClay]

58 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Maybe Trump can teach her a thing or two.

 

[Lhalo]

6 minutes ago, JarsOfClay said:

Maybe Trump can teach her a thing or two.

 

I want to see Biden try that lol. 

[Lou]

27 minutes ago, JarsOfClay said:

The recommended penalty by the US government for which Ted Cruz is a part of and makes laws for recommended 5-12 years, she gave the guy 5 years, as recommended by the branch of government that Ted Cruz works for. If Ted Cruz thinks it's too lenient then he can write a law making the punishments more severe which he never did because he's just a performance artist who is perfectly fine with the current penalty.

In the link I posted, she gave the guy 3 months.

There is no child porn case where a conviction should receive only 3 months in jail. None. 

[Kotchman]

The reality is liberal politicians don’t really give a shit about children. They’re ok with killing them in the womb. They’ll hand kids puberty  blockers and encourage a lifestyle that will likely end in suicide. We shouldn’t be surprised libs don’t frown on child porn. The dominos have fallen one by one. The next domino is it’s ok to be born sexually attracted to kids. 

[Jason]

9 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

The reality is liberal politicians don’t really give a shit about children. They’re ok with killing them in the womb. They’ll hand kids puberty  blockers and encourage a lifestyle that will likely end in suicide. We shouldn’t be surprised libs don’t frown on child porn. The dominos have fallen one by one. The next domino is it’s ok to be born sexually attracted to kids. 

I would not be shocked if this was accurate 

[JarsOfClay]

23 minutes ago, Lou said:

In the link I posted, she gave the guy 3 months.

There is no child porn case where a conviction should receive only 3 months in jail. None. 

Oh the one where he was in possession of "child porn" with children who were 3 years younger than him? He was 18, the "children" were 15, she made the correct decision.