2017 College Football

[Blarg]

2 hours ago, Lou said:

Where's the outrage over southern cal getting 2 weeks to prepare (and heal) for the conference title game while Stanford has to play 6 days after playing #8 Notre Dame? 

FFS, and all that. 

 

 

Yeah, USC should have played some sub .500 FCS team to equal the competiveness of Alabama's schedule.

[Blarg]

2 hours ago, nate said:

They aren’t until they beat OSU

 

they did go undefeated in conference play though which again is more than Alabama could say

[nando714]

8 hours ago, Blarg said:

Yeah, USC should have played some sub .500 FCS team to equal the competiveness of Alabama's schedule.

Mercer clearly prepared Alabama for Auburn.

[Lou]

17 hours ago, AngelsLongBall said:

Bye week holmes

I know that. 

[Lou]

16 hours ago, Blarg said:

Yeah, USC should have played some sub .500 FCS team to equal the competiveness of Alabama's schedule.

Not having to play at all is better than having to play, regardless of who the opponent is

[Lou]

19 hours ago, nate said:

They aren’t until they beat OSU

they did go undefeated in conference play though which again is more than Alabama could say

Lol

you lose all credibility when you say Wisconsin isn't being considered. They wouldn't be ranked #3 if they weren't. 

So you really think think not losing a game is basis for choosing a team over one that has one loss ? Is that why Wisconsin and their creampuff schedule is more deserving than the teams with a loss? 

 

[AngelsLongBall]

24 minutes ago, Lou said:

I know that. 

So you clearly were outraged when the schedule came out and SC played 12 weeks in a row?  

FFS, and all that.

[nate]

23 minutes ago, Lou said:

Lol

you lose all credibility when you say Wisconsin isn't being considered. They wouldn't be ranked #3 if they weren't. 

So you really think think not losing a game is basis for choosing a team over one that has one loss ? Is that why Wisconsin and their creampuff schedule is more deserving than the teams with a loss? 

 

They didn't become considered until other teams lost.

If Wisconsin loses the OSU game then they won't be in the playoff, I don't get your outrage.  If they go undefeated including wins against Michigan and Ohio State they should be in.  Bama only faced one good team this year and lost to them.

[Lou]

Clemson lost to a shitty Syracuse team (who lost to Middle Tennessee St)

and played THE Citadel.

Auburn has two losses, including one to LSU (who lost to FCS member Troy) 

 

 

[nate]

2 minutes ago, Lou said:

Clemson lost to a shitty Syracuse team (who lost to Middle Tennessee St)

and played THE Citadel.

Auburn has two losses, including one to LSU (who lost to FCS member Troy) 

 

 

But they beat Alabama and will compete to win their conference.  A team that can't even win the conference has no business in the playoff over a team that has.

[Angel Oracle]

After all of that, still have all top 10 teams from a week ago remaining in the Top 10?    USC is still #11.

CFB Final Four is widdddeee open.

[Lou]

46 minutes ago, AngelsLongBall said:

So you clearly were outraged when the schedule came out and SC played 12 weeks in a row?  

FFS, and all that.

I thought it was completely unfair. I don't understand how that can even happen. 

[AngelsLongBall]

25 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

After all of that, still have all top 10 teams from a week ago remaining in the Top 10?    USC is still #11.

CFB Final Four is widdddeee open.

SC is not a top ten team.  They're softer than baby poo

[Lou]

You can can keep saying Bama didn't play anyone, but facts don't support it. 

They bear 3 teams that are currently ranked.

 

[Lou]

29 minutes ago, nate said:

But they beat Alabama and will compete to win their conference.  A team that can't even win the conference has no business in the playoff over a team that has.

So, in your view, the playoffs are only for conference champs, with teams that are undefeated get an automatic bid? 

[Lou]

30 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

After all of that, still have all top 10 teams from a week ago remaining in the Top 10?    USC is still #11.

CFB Final Four is widdddeee open.

Yeah, that's incredible that they can win 3 in a row and not move up one spot. 

[nate]

4 minutes ago, Lou said:

So, in your view, the playoffs are only for conference champs, with teams that are undefeated get an automatic bid? 

Undefeated power 5 teams should definitely get in over 1 loss power 5 teams.  Teams that can't even win their conference have no business in for sure.

[Lou]

and lol at counting Michigan as a good win. Bama beat 3 teams ranked higher (and the one ranked directly below)

[AngelsLongBall]

1 hour ago, Lou said:

and lol at counting Michigan as a good win. Bama beat 3 teams ranked higher (and the one ranked directly below)

You're gonna have to change your profile pic here pretty quick.  May I suggest:

[Vegas Halo Fan]

42 minutes ago, AngelsLongBall said:

You're gonna have to change your profile pic here pretty quick.  May I suggest:

The one at upper left looks about 45 years old.

[nando714]

3 hours ago, Lou said:

Clemson lost to a shitty Syracuse team (who lost to Middle Tennessee St)

and played THE Citadel.

Auburn has two losses, including one to LSU (who lost to FCS member Troy) 

 

 

I think the timing of when you lose matters. People tend to forget lol.

I haven’t heard 1 talking head bring up the Syracuse loss and if they do they bring up the Bryant injury. I agree with you that’s a terrible loss. 

Auburn has 2 losses but have beaten Bama and UGA and that was done very recently. 

This season no one has a perfect resume. There is a lot of parity in the top 10 this season more than ever in the playoff era. 

 

[Lou]

6 hours ago, AngelsLongBall said:

You're gonna have to change your profile pic here pretty quick.  May I suggest:

 

I'm good, thanks

 

[nate]

[AngelsLongBall]

11 hours ago, Lou said:

I'm good, thanks

 

[nate]

17 hours ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

The one at upper left looks about 45 years old.

Generations of inbreeding really take their toll