Jump to content

  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Feel the Bern......he won't win because of Super delegates

yvangelfan

By yvangelfan
in AngelsSpin.com Political Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

Glen Baseball Ops

Glen

Posted
Posted

Clinton has already accumulated 449 Super delegates to Sanders 19 out of 712.

Super delegates are current Congress people, Governors, etc.

The delegates can change their minds, as they did for Obama, but this time they won't.

Waste of time for Bernie supporters.

It just happened recently but it won't happen again. Solid logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tank Hall of Fame

Tank

Posted
Posted

The DNC is shady, and itd chairman is batshit. This primary is rigged.

 

i have thought for a good while that this has always been about breaking the gender barrier for the presidency. once the color barrier was broken, this was the next logical step.

 

i just wish they hadn't put all their eggs in the basket of one of the shadiest, most dishonest people in the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

i have thought for a good while that this has always been about breaking the gender barrier for the presidency. once the color barrier was broken, this was the next logical step.

i just wish they hadn't put all their eggs in the basket of one of the shadiest, most dishonest people in the system.

You're right, a woman president is the next logical step,

I am simply against the selection process the DNC uses. The whole "superdelegate" thing is a sham. It is designed this way to prevent non-establishment candidates from winning the primary: hence why you'll never see a candidate like Bernie advance to the General Election.

The DNC has been salivating over Hilary from the start because she is the very definition of establishment–just another run of the mill democrat. What people don't realize is how pro-establishment Obama is. Color or gender certainly adds to the popularity of a candidate, but a candidate can only win by playing ball with the Party and parroting their rhetoric.

The Republicans have a similar dilemma with Trump (an anti-establishment, outsider without real ties to the GOP), but they haven't sabotaged him. Their selection process is more fair, and they aren't scheduling debates at bizarre times like the DNC.

I'm quite "liberal", but I'll be damned if I ever vote for another corporate puppet like Hilary. I made the same error with Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yvangelfan Double-A

yvangelfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You're right, a woman president is the next logical step,

I am simply against the selection process the DNC uses. The whole "superdelegate" thing is a sham. It is designed this way to prevent non-establishment candidates from winning the primary: hence why you'll never see a candidate like Bernie advance to the General Election.

The DNC has been salivating over Hilary from the start because she is the very definition of establishment–just another run of the mill democrat. What people don't realize is how pro-establishment Obama is. Color or gender certainly adds to the popularity of a candidate, but a candidate can only win by playing ball with the Party and parroting their rhetoric.

The Republicans have a similar dilemma with Trump (an anti-establishment, outsider without real ties to the GOP), but they haven't sabotaged him. Their selection process is more fair, and they aren't scheduling debates at bizarre times like the DNC.

I'm quite "liberal", but I'll be damned if I ever vote for another corporate puppet like Hilary. I made the same error with Obama.

 

 

What did you think of Carly Fiorina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yvangelfan Double-A

yvangelfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You're right, a woman president is the next logical step,

I am simply against the selection process the DNC uses. The whole "superdelegate" thing is a sham. It is designed this way to prevent non-establishment candidates from winning the primary: hence why you'll never see a candidate like Bernie advance to the General Election.

The DNC has been salivating over Hilary from the start because she is the very definition of establishment–just another run of the mill democrat. What people don't realize is how pro-establishment Obama is. Color or gender certainly adds to the popularity of a candidate, but a candidate can only win by playing ball with the Party and parroting their rhetoric.

The Republicans have a similar dilemma with Trump (an anti-establishment, outsider without real ties to the GOP), but they haven't sabotaged him. Their selection process is more fair, and they aren't scheduling debates at bizarre times like the DNC.

I'm quite "liberal", but I'll be damned if I ever vote for another corporate puppet like Hilary. I made the same error with Obama.

 

 

How do you figure Obama is pro-establishment?

 

Isn't he the first Dem to appoint a Muslim as our CIA Director?

 

Or how about removing the "looking for work" requirement for welfare?

 

Or inviting the Muslim Brotherhood and black lives matter and La Raza to the White House?

 

And I can't recall other Dems running guns to the drug cartel (fast n furious).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...