SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

[gotbeer]

56 minutes ago, cals said:

Also, if I told you to "lick my ass", Tank would just edit it to "lick my asparagus."

Well, tank does like to make it more disgusting.  

[Make Angels Great Again]

2 hours ago, cals said:

Some fat bitch came into my office yesterday and was telling my assistant she had it three times.  You could tell she was also the fat bitch in high school who told people she had some stud athlete boyfriend but “he went to another school”.  Oh also she’s “a model”.

Yeah right.

 

How funny. My wife has a fat bitch friend who says she's had it 3 times.

[Kotchman]

8 hours ago, RallyMo said:

Yes, there's tons of data available. I can't think of a health issue that's had more data generated in such a short amount of time. With that said, data has shown for a long time that the vaccinated can get infected. It shows that the vaccinated are protected (no, not 100%, and that's an unreasonable expectation) from adverse outcomes when infected.

So we know that people who are vaccinated are absolutely able to get infected, but do get infected at lower rates. They also have better outcomes, and overwhelmingly so (it's not even close).

What kind of data are you looking for? Honestly, I'd be happy to point you in the right direction if you have questions.

There is also tons of data simple solutions like vitamin d , zinc, and ivermectin are effective treatments. You know all the treatments fauci and the feds shit on while vaccinated people continue to die from covid.

[Kotchman]

The reality is fauci and these nut hugging libs spent 99% of their time pushing lockdowns, mask , and vaccines when zinc , hydro, ivermectin and weight loss were the keys to survival. 

[Kotchman]

Libs solution to covid is damn near worse than their zoning ban and apartments for all approach to housing 

[Redondo]

CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective

However, the Johns Hopkins study received no mention on any of the five liberal networks this week. According to Grabien transcripts, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored the anti-lockdown findings after having spent much of the pandemic shaming red states with minimal restrictions and events deemed by critics as "superspreaders."

It wasn't just the networks avoiding the study. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, Reuters, USA Today, Axios, Politico among other outlets also turned a blind eye to the findings, according to search results. 

[gotbeer]

On 2/3/2022 at 10:02 AM, RallyMo said:

It's wrong to say that a large portion of nurses have been fired, but this is absolutely infuriating. These fuckers lost control of their labor market and they're pissed that somebody is treating them this way. Screw them. I have a lot of thoughts about this, but they didn't show their nurses that they were valued in any meaningful way and because of that they're having to pay for it. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them.

Good news Rally.  Your cheap minimum wage labor is on it's way.

Strained US hospitals seek foreign nurses amid visa windfall

 

[Jason]

2 hours ago, Redondo said:

CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective

However, the Johns Hopkins study received no mention on any of the five liberal networks this week. According to Grabien transcripts, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored the anti-lockdown findings after having spent much of the pandemic shaming red states with minimal restrictions and events deemed by critics as "superspreaders."

It wasn't just the networks avoiding the study. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, Reuters, USA Today, Axios, Politico among other outlets also turned a blind eye to the findings, according to search results. 

Shocking 

[St1ck]

Here's What We Know About 'Johns Hopkins Study' on Lockdowns | Snopes.com
https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/02/03/johns-hopkins-study-on-lockdowns/

The first thing we noticed when we examined the actual study, not the media reports covering the study, was that this was a “working paper” by a group of economists, not epidemiologists. A working paper typically refers to a pre-publication study that has not yet undergone a scientific peer-review process. The authors state as much in a brief description at the top of the study:

This opening paragraph contains one other important detail. This study was not endorsed by Johns Hopkins University. While many media outlets presented this working paper as if it was a “Johns Hopkins study,” this report would be more accurately described as a non-peer-reviewed working paper by three economists, one of whom is an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University.

This work was conducted by three economists, not epidemiologists: Jonas Herby, Lars Jonung, and Steve H. Hanke

 

[Crampknees]

30 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Here's What We Know About 'Johns Hopkins Study' on Lockdowns | Snopes.com
https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/02/03/johns-hopkins-study-on-lockdowns/

The first thing we noticed when we examined the actual study, not the media reports covering the study, was that this was a “working paper” by a group of economists, not epidemiologists. A working paper typically refers to a pre-publication study that has not yet undergone a scientific peer-review process. The authors state as much in a brief description at the top of the study:

This opening paragraph contains one other important detail. This study was not endorsed by Johns Hopkins University. While many media outlets presented this working paper as if it was a “Johns Hopkins study,” this report would be more accurately described as a non-peer-reviewed working paper by three economists, one of whom is an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University.

This work was conducted by three economists, not epidemiologists: Jonas Herby, Lars Jonung, and Steve H. Hanke

 

ruh-roh. That's an outrage boner killer. 

[Jason]

7 minutes ago, Crampknees said:

ruh-roh. That's an outrage boner killer. 

Fact is, lockdowns save lives. It’s important to squash any misinformation about them. We may very well need more of them in the future 

Edited February 5, 2022 by Jason

[Crampknees]

15 minutes ago, Jason said:

Fact is, lockdowns save lives. It’s important to squash any misinformation about them. We may very well need more of them in the future 

Need to tell that to Redondo

[gotbeer]

44 minutes ago, Jason said:

Fact is, lockdowns save lives. It’s important to squash any misinformation about them. We may very well need more of them in the future 

If the fact is that lockdowns saved lives.  Then why aren't we locking down, when more people are dying from Covid than ever before?

[Jason]

6 minutes ago, gotbeer said:

If the fact is that lockdowns saved lives.  Then why aren't we locking down, when more people are dying from Covid than ever before?

Because we are foolish. They need to weld doors shut on our houses as people are being selfish and trying to live like everything is normal. Virtual learning has protected many of our children yet schools are going back to the deadly in person classes. 

[fan_since79]

16 hours ago, Kotchman said:

There is also tons of data simple solutions like vitamin d , zinc, and ivermectin are effective treatments. You know all the treatments fauci and the feds shit on while vaccinated people continue to die from covid.

Those simple solutions are cheap and won't make billions of dollars for the pharma companies. That's the reason.

The medical establishment is fully invested in vaccines, boosters, and more boosters. There will be endless boosters for this recurring virus with a 98% survival rate. For children the survival rate is close to 100%, yet Fauci wants to vaccinate 6-month old babies now. This will never end.

 

[St1ck]

25 minutes ago, cals said:

Fox is shameless.

You have to respect Fox News for never having their pundits work remotely nor do they require a vaccine or negative test for entering the building. At least they walk the walk. 

[Jason]

31 minutes ago, cals said:

 

I can’t figure out what’s funnier.  The retarded guy attempting sarcasm or the Asian guy not understanding sarcasm.

Sarcasm? It’s obvious the lockdowns worked. We’ve only had 900,000 people die from covid. 

[Blarg]

11 minutes ago, St1ck said:

You have to respect Fox News for never having their pundits work remotely nor do they require a vaccine or negative test for entering the building. At least they walk the walk. 

Where do you get that disinformation?  

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/business/fox-vaccine-mandate.html

Fox Corporation, the owner of Fox News, told employees on Friday that those working in New York City would have to show proof they’d had at least one dose of the Covid vaccine by Dec. 27, removing the option to get tested weekly instead.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/09/15/white-house-praises-fox-for-its-new-covid-policy-encourages-network-to-convey-to-their-audience-why-its-effective

In effect, Fox has adopted a more stringent version of the vaccine and testing mandate President Biden announced last week — the mandate that the company’s loudest voices have trashed and deemed to be nonsensical and “authoritarian.” While Biden pushed a vaccination or weekly testing requirement, Fox is saying it will implement a vaccination or daily testing requirement for unvaccinated staff.

 

[Kotchman]

45 minutes ago, fan_since79 said:

Those simple solutions are cheap and won't make billions of dollars for the pharma companies. That's the reason.

The medical establishment is fully invested in vaccines, boosters, and more boosters. There will be endless boosters for this recurring virus with a 98% survival rate. For children the survival rate is close to 100%, yet Fauci wants to vaccinate 6-month old babies now. This will never end.

 

Yes this play book continues to lose support but that won’t stop the dems. A quick look at the news shows a shift back to the old racist play card. From the NFL to random HS stories the page was full of old racist whitey stories. A clear signal the midterm election cycle has begun

[St1ck]

4 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Where do you get that disinformation?  

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/business/fox-vaccine-mandate.html

Fox Corporation, the owner of Fox News, told employees on Friday that those working in New York City would have to show proof they’d had at least one dose of the Covid vaccine by Dec. 27, removing the option to get tested weekly instead.

 

Shit. Well at least they never worked remotely. 

[Blarg]

5 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Shit. Well at least they never worked remotely. 

The entire industry shut it's doors for months. All of FOX News was working remote two years ago, Tucker was broadcasting from his den from his laptop camera.

No lot entrance for anyone, all sets went dark, every crew member or staff member refused entry. 

Even now our building which our two floors had over 200 people working in has only 16 staff members allowed inside because of protocols. None of our production staff, editing staff, story people, not even the Executive Producers have been inside the building for nearly two years.

The parking lot which is four floors deep now has a scattering of cars parked two years later and iHeart radio is based in one of the buildings, they have a skeleton staff along with the old NBC studios next door. 

Stay in your lane, St1ick.

[St1ck]

11 minutes ago, Blarg said:

The entire industry shut it's doors for months. All of FOX News was working remote two years ago, Tucker was broadcasting from his den from his laptop camera.

No lot entrance for anyone, all sets went dark, every crew member or staff member refused entry. 

Even now our building which our two floors had over 200 people working in has only 16 staff members allowed inside because of protocols. None of our production staff, editing staff, story people, not even the Executive Producers have been inside the building for nearly two years.

The parking lot which is four floors deep now has a scattering of cars parked two years later and iHeart radio is based in one of the buildings, they have a skeleton staff along with the old NBC studios next door. 

Stay in your lane, St1ick.

Dammit. Well for sure once they were back in the studio they didn't do that faggy social distancing stuff.

[Blarg]

28 minutes ago, cals said:

Does the fat guy not understand sarcasm, too?

Shut up ambulance chaser, the adults are having a conversation.

[St1ck]

Fuuuuuuck

 

[Jason]

I liked the stories about the remote broadcasts where people jerked off on camera. Funny stuff 

Edited February 5, 2022 by Jason