Voter Suppression

[UndertheHalo]

1 minute ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

I don't really want to see any more of this shit, it's terrible whichever side is doing it.

I keep telling you guys.  This is it.  The whole thing is collapsed.  There’s no turning what we’re seeing today back.  The consensus is dead. 

[Spirit]

54 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

haha.  God you’re full of shit. 

 

 

Look, if you believe there's a massive problem with fraudulent votes ... you do you.

 

 

 

[Rico]

1 hour ago, Jay said:

Can Atlanta or Cobb County sue MLB? Obviously they can show damages.

 

Was there a written contract?  And if there is does it allow MLB to end it by a specific date?

[Kotchman]

5 minutes ago, Rico said:

Was there a written contract?  And if there is does it allow MLB to end it by a specific date?

Do you think the MLB removing this is helping minorities? Atlanta is damn near 70% black. The lost revenue from lap dances and alcohol only hurts the black community. 

[Rico]

4 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

 The lost revenue from lap dances and alcohol only hurts the black community. 

Damn bro, chill.

[Kotchman]

4 minutes ago, Rico said:

Damn bro, chill.

I wasn't condemning you. Just dumb  that the dems and Lebron promoting this boycott. There ain't that many white people in Atlanta so they are only screwing blacks

[Lou]

Lebron is now part-owner of the Red Sox, the 2nd most racist team in American sports history.

[Kotchman]

Just now, Lou said:

Lebron is now part-owner of the Red Sox, the 2nd most racist team in sports.

I forgot about that. Interesting choice for a woke warrior. 

[Blarg]

3 hours ago, AngelsLakersFan said:

Election security is cool, but how about making it illegal to hand out water to people standing in line to vote?

It can be inferred as influence and I have no problem with requiring no interaction with voters in line. 

[tdawg87]

9 minutes ago, Blarg said:

It can be inferred as influence and I have no problem with requiring no interaction with voters in line. 

Lol ok

[Redondo]

MLB requires photo proof to pick up tickets but boycotts Georgia for voter ID law

[Redondo]

Coca-Cola requires ID for meeting but slams Georgia for voter law

[St1ck]

15 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Lol ok

You don't know how many times people that have waited hours in line changed their vote because someone handed them a bottle of water. It's somewhere in the range of 0-0. 

[St1ck]

7 minutes ago, Redondo said:

MLB requires photo proof to pick up tickets but boycotts Georgia for voter ID law

 

3 minutes ago, Redondo said:

Coca-Cola requires ID for meeting but slams Georgia for voter law

Both companies are also ran by people smart enough to realize voter ID isn't the only thing in the bill. 

[Blarg]

12 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

Lol ok

Where we live there isn't allowed any outside interaction with people in line to vote. There really doesn't seem to be anyone objecting to those rules. But if you allow it then altercations will eventually occur so why open that door? You guys are hung up on bullshit that is being sold as something it isn't. 

[tdawg87]

19 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Where we live there isn't allowed any outside interaction with people in line to vote. There really doesn't seem to be anyone objecting to those rules. But if you allow it then altercations will eventually occur so why open that door? You guys are hung up on bullshit that is being sold as something it isn't. 

Why would there be altercations, Blarg?

[Blarg]

Because some stupid shit with a water bottle would lip off about a candidate to some voter that hates that candidate and a brawl will occur. Why play the stupid innocent card in this argument? Leave the voters alone. Simple. 

[tdawg87]

4 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Because some stupid shit with a water bottle would lip off about a candidate to some voter that hates that candidate and a brawl will occur. 

If you go into the voting booth undecided and some dude giving you free water decides who you are voting for, then you're fucking stupid. 

[Blarg]

If you go to a voting booth with the intent of changing voters minds you are breaking the law. Why are you so adamant about adding another level of fuckery to voting? Because that is all this is. 

[tdawg87]

57 minutes ago, Blarg said:

If you go to a voting booth with the intent of changing voters minds you are breaking the law. Why are you so adamant about adding another level of fuckery to voting? Because that is all this is. 

Dude you are building one of the dumbest strawman arguments I've ever seen.

I'm actually convinced you're trolling now.

[Blarg]

Sorry if making sense is unrecognizable to you. 

[Vegas Halo Fan]

2 hours ago, Blarg said:

Sorry if making sense is unrecognizable to you. 

Saying that passing out water to people standing in line will result in brawls and voter influencing doesn't make sense.

[mtangelsfan]

18 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

Lol ok

I don’t think it is laughable, what if when they hand out the water they said “vote for....” or something similar?

[Vegas Halo Fan]

5 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I don’t think it is laughable, what if when they hand out the water they said “vote for....” or something similar?

Soliciting votes at polling places is illegal, and it should remain so. The water isn't the main problem, though.

[tdawg87]

11 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I don’t think it is laughable, what if when they hand out the water they said “vote for....” or something similar?

We shouldn't make laws based on "What if"s.

There's no defending this. Just stop.