Ruth Bader Ginsburg passes away at 87

[St1ck]

8 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

 

apparently they want a civil war or something?

Who the hell is this dude?

[Jay]

I didn't even read this thread but LOL at the goofballs in here.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, st1ckboy said:

Who the hell is this dude?

Reza Aslan.

[St1ck]

Just now, tdawg87 said:

Reza Aslan.

Um, who?

[Jason]

It doesn’t matter if you know these fools as I have no clue who they are. They are blue check marks on a Twitter that have many followers and they’re threatening violence. Why is that their go to for when they are upset?

Edited September 19, 2020 by Jason

[Jason]

15 minutes ago, fishbulb said:

That's fascinating, but you know that you would totally try and hold up any nomination if you were in their shoes.

I think it was a stupid move in 2016 and I think it’s stupid now but yeah, I understand your point 

[St1ck]

8 minutes ago, Jason said:

It doesn’t matter if you know these fools as I have no clue who they are. They are blue check marks on a Twitter that have many followers and they’re threatening violence. Why is that their go to for when they are upset?

Blue check marks!? That shit is serious.  I've said it 1,000 times and I'm guessing I'll have to say it 1,000 more times. Get off Twitter. 

[Rico]

 

[Jason]

1 minute ago, Rico said:

 

Yep, what they did was truly stupid and what goes around comes around. Didn’t the Dems end the filibuster for nominees when that happened though?

[Jason]

4 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

Blue check marks!? That shit is serious.  I've said it 1,000 times and I'm guessing I'll have to say it 1,000 more times. Get off Twitter. 

It is serious because we are already dealing with all kinds of riots with looting and burning of cities. It’s extremely irresponsible to add fuel to the fire 

[Rico]

Should Republicans push through a nominee then Dems should play their game once they do get in power. 

Add two new supreme court spots, make PR and DC states, split California in two creating a couple more senators.

[St1ck]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

It is serious because we are already dealing with all kinds of riots with looting and burning of cities. It’s extremely irresponsible to add fuel to the fire 

Which proves my point that Twitter is garbage. 

[Make Angels Great Again]

6 minutes ago, Rico said:

 

That's funny. If we're going to hold politicians to their word about things they said years ago you've got some catching up to do with Biden.

[Make Angels Great Again]

2 minutes ago, Rico said:

Should Republicans push through a nominee then Dems should play their game once they do get in power. 

Add two new supreme court spots, make PR and DC states, split California in two creating a couple more senators.

I... don't think democrats can just sort of do those things at their whim.

[Make Angels Great Again]

2 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

Which proves my point that Twitter is garbage. 

You're not wrong, but it's still people on the left saying these things and inciting chaos. Of course twitter is a cesspool.

[St1ck]

1 minute ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

You're not wrong, but it's still people on the left saying these things and inciting chaos. Of course twitter is a cesspool.

Today it is. Yesterday it was people on the right.  It's a shit platform. 

[Jason]

6 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

I... don't think democrats can just sort of do those things at their whim.

Don’t ruin his fantasy 

[Jason]

There is a real chance (99.99%) that the election will be contested so how does that work with an 8 person SCOTUS? That’s a constitutional crisis in the making 

[St1ck]

2 hours ago, st1ckboy said:

The talking point is already out there. They need to confirm a judge in case it's a contested election. 

 

1 minute ago, Jason said:

There is a real chance (99.99%) that the election will be contested so how does that work with an 8 person SCOTUS? That’s a constitutional crisis in the making 

 

[wopphil]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

There is a real chance (99.99%) that the election will be contested so how does that work with an 8 person SCOTUS? That’s a constitutional crisis in the making 

I hadn’t thought of this. This is actually kind of terrifying. 

[arch stanton]

10 minutes ago, Jason said:

There is a real chance (99.99%) that the election will be contested so how does that work with an 8 person SCOTUS? That’s a constitutional crisis in the making 

That was created in 2016

[Jason]

21 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

 

 

I missed that. I apologize for the Craig 

[Jay]

With shit as stupid as it is right now, it's more important than ever to lock down the SCOTUS.

I think the U.S. Senate knows that.

 

 

[St1ck]

5 minutes ago, Jason said:

I missed that. I apologize for the Craig 

Oh it wasn't a Craig. I was pointing out that you are a parrot. The line was put out hours ago and yet here you are repeating it like it was your own thought. 

[Jason]

I think hypocrisy is a requirement to hold office 

Edited September 19, 2020 by Jason