Stripling: I had no chance to make Dodgers' rotation, Angels trade was win-win​​​​​​​

[MarcusJF91]

Stripling's a buster. My cuz used to cut his hair

[DCAngelsFan]

2 hours ago, Kevinb said:

I agree I think and it's pretty well known now that he got in the way of the Stripling deal which is unfortunate. But I think he equally got in the way of he Rendon deal and got that deal done in a very fast fortune. Arte giveth and taketh away, but I'd still say he's a top 5 owner in all of MLB. 

So, are we sure we know the full parameters of the deal?  That the Dodgers didn't start some incremental demands for more?  Llike "oh, and throw in Marsh while you're at it."

'cause the trade looked kind of imbalanced to me - and Arte detonating that trade for no good reason is still kind of hard to fathom.  

 

 

 

 

[Angel Oracle]

6 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

Arte is a butthead.

     Butthead! Butthead!

Edited May 7, 2020 by Angel Oracle

[Slegnaac]

3 hours ago, Lou said:

Arte = no credit, all blame. 

Same as it ever was. 

Just a bunch of taking heads

[Lou]

7 minutes ago, Slegnaac said:

Just a bunch of taking heads

Nice effort, but you missed the landing.

[MarcusJF91]

 

55 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

     Butthead! Butthead!

At least he aint no descendent of slave owners

[Lou]

18 minutes ago, MarcusJF91 said:

 

At least he aint no descendent of slave owners

[kevinb]

2 hours ago, DCAngelsFan said:

So, are we sure we know the full parameters of the deal?  That the Dodgers didn't start some incremental demands for more?  Llike "oh, and throw in Marsh while you're at it."

'cause the trade looked kind of imbalanced to me - and Arte detonating that trade for no good reason is still kind of hard to fathom.  

 

 

 

 

Yes from all reports. Nothing had changed. Fletcher even confirmed it here. 

[ScottT]

What a dumbass

[Biergott]

8 hours ago, Lou said:

Arte = no credit, all blame. 

Same as it ever was.