Joe Biden

[Dtwncbad]

46 minutes ago, JarsOfClay said:

We're not voting about fees and rules in a condominium. We're voting on healthcare, taxes, immigration, jobs, wages, nuclear disarmament, and other essential things that affect all american lives.

Comparing it to voting on rules in a condominium is incredibly stupid. 

The majority should always decide the direction of the country. 70k idiots across 3 states shouldn't overrule the votes of 65 million people with a 3 million plurality. 

The electoral college is non-democratic and divisive and should be abolished.

Cute answer but you still stubbornly refuse to recognize we have 50 separate elections that day, not one national election.

You can’t use “extra” votes in the California or New York election to help you win entirely separate elections in other states.

Again, this shit really is not that complicated.

 

[angelinkc]

5 hours ago, JarsOfClay said:

We're not voting about fees and rules in a condominium. We're voting on healthcare, taxes, immigration, jobs, wages, nuclear disarmament, and other essential things that affect all american lives.

Comparing it to voting on rules in a condominium is incredibly stupid. 

The majority should always decide the direction of the country. 70k idiots across 3 states shouldn't overrule the votes of 65 million people with a 3 million plurality. 

The electoral college is non-democratic and divisive and should be abolished.

If you want to play that game, remove Cali and Trump wins by 2 million votes. Remove New York and Cali , Trump wins by 4 million. The Founders developed a pretty good plan. Imagine if the whole country was ran by two of the three most bankrupt states in the union. 

[angelinkc]

 

[Redondo]

SEE IT: Carson once poked fun at plagiarism claims against Biden

OLDIE BUT GOODIE

[Taylor]

14 hours ago, Dtwncbad said:

Cute answer but you still stubbornly refuse to recognize we have 50 separate elections that day, not one national election.

You can’t use “extra” votes in the California or New York election to help you win entirely separate elections in other states.

Again, this shit really is not that complicated.

 

I'm wondering if Dtwncbad is another cals alt. Wasn't his writing close to flop levels a few weeks ago? And now he's very erudite.

[Dtwncbad]

13 minutes ago, Taylor said:

I'm wondering if Dtwncbad is another cals alt. Wasn't his writing close to flop levels a few weeks ago? And now he's very erudite.

It seems suspicious to you that more than one poster can be mentally organized in understanding the electoral college?

This is fucking hilarious. 

[Rico]

15 hours ago, Jason said:

Wrong. Health care, taxes, immigration, jobs, wages and those things vary from region to region and state to state. That’s why the electoral college is still relevant. What is important for New York may not be the same for those in South Dakota. Of course it isn’t democratic because we aren’t a democracy. 

in 2016 2.8 million New Yorkers cast their for vote for Trump.  Meanwhile South Dakota has a population of 850k.  lol

[Rico]

9 hours ago, angelinkc said:

If you want to play that game, remove Cali and Trump wins by 2 million votes. Remove New York and Cali , Trump wins by 4 million. The Founders developed a pretty good plan. Imagine if the whole country was ran by two of the three most bankrupt states in the union. 

Yes, screw the most people as possible.  

[Dtwncbad]

4 minutes ago, Rico said:

Yes, screw the most people as possible.  

You probably don’t realize you haven’t explained, at all, how anyone is getting screwed by the electoral college.

[Amazing Larry]

6 minutes ago, Rico said:

Yes, screw the most people as possible.  

I believe Canada is calling you home.

[Rico]

2 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

You probably don’t realize you haven’t explained, at all, how anyone is getting screwed by the electoral college.

There are more Republicans in New York and California than there is combined population of several red states. Meanwhile all the Dems in deep red states.   In reality, there are only about 8 swing states each election that get pandered to and everyone else gets a big FU.

[JarsOfClay]

10 hours ago, angelinkc said:

If you want to play that game, remove Cali and Trump wins by 2 million votes. Remove New York and Cali , Trump wins by 4 million. The Founders developed a pretty good plan. Imagine if the whole country was ran by two of the three most bankrupt states in the union. 

I see your Cali and New York and I will remove Texas, Kentucky, and Alabama. 

Your turn.

[tdawg87]

51 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

I believe Canada is calling you home.

I mean, Canada is so much better than the US it's kind of sad.

Also we can't go to Canada because of our handling of the coronavirus.

[Dtwncbad]

55 minutes ago, Rico said:

There are more Republicans in New York and California than there is combined population of several red states. Meanwhile all the Dems in deep red states.   In reality, there are only about 8 swing states each election that get pandered to and everyone else gets a big FU.

The whining is loud.  Basically the complaint is there are actually people in each state that end up not on the winning side of their own state election.  Oh, the horror.

I vote Republican in California.  I am on the losing side in California in a Presidential election.  I don’t cry about it.

Somebody wins and somebody loses.  Grown ups deal with it rather than froth at the mouth over an entirely irrelevant and contrived idea of a “popular vote” that literally does not exist.

[JarsOfClay]

1 minute ago, Dtwncbad said:

The whining is loud.  Basically the complaint is there are actually people in each state that end up not on the winning side of their own state election.  Oh, the horror.

I vote Republican in California.  I am on the losing side in California in a Presidential election.  I don’t cry about it.

Somebody wins and somebody loses.  Grown ups deal with it rather than froth at the mouth over an entirely irrelevant and contrived idea of a “popular vote” that literally does not exist.

You just explained why the electoral college should be abolished.

Your vote will actually start to mean something.

[Dtwncbad]

1 minute ago, JarsOfClay said:

You just explained why the electoral college should be abolished.

Your vote will actually start to mean something.

My vote was fully counted in California.

All the votes counted with a winner and a loser.

 

[JarsOfClay]

3 minutes ago, Dtwncbad said:

My vote was fully counted in California.

All the votes counted with a winner and a loser.

 

Oh please, your vote doesn't mean shit with the electoral college and you know it.

[Dtwncbad]

1 minute ago, JarsOfClay said:

Oh please, your vote doesn't mean shit with the electoral college and you know it.

Your fantasy that we have a National election for a President of the population (rather than of the States) doesn’t mean shit and you are too dumb to know it.

[Tank]

the EC wasn't a problem until hilary lost.

[Dtwncbad]

10 minutes ago, Tank said:

the EC wasn't a problem until hilary lost.

Democrats always want systems that protect the minority, other than in just one specific situation: where they are the majority.  And then, of course, they want a system that doesn’t protect the minority. 

Edited September 17, 2020 by Dtwncbad

[Taylor]

40 minutes ago, Tank said:

the EC wasn't a problem until hilary lost.

That's like saying cancer wasn't a problem until it started showing symptoms.

[m0nkey]

On 9/16/2020 at 10:41 AM, Adam said:

Anyone wanna go $20 on the election today? I'll take Trump

Is this still available?  I wouldn't mind losing this bet.

[St1ck]

3 minutes ago, m0nkey said:

Is this still available?  I wouldn't mind losing this bet.

An Asian that likes to gamble. Shocking.

[angelinkc]

55 minutes ago, Tank said:

the EC wasn't a problem until hilary lost.

Funny how that works. The Party of super delegates thinks the EC is unfair 

[Jason]

The left can complain about the EC all they want because it isn’t going anywhere