Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

So you’re of the opinion they should remain soft targets? 

I don't believe that putting guns in schools solves anything. Say you have an armed security guard with a handgun. An attacker comes in with an AR-15, first target is the security guard. What exactly have you fixed?

Edited by Vegas Halo Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

So you’re of the opinion they should remain soft targets? 

Do you honestly think that whoever would take a job as an armed elementary school guard actually makes the school safer? Is the solution to win with firepower or to make more effort to prevent entry into the schools?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kotchman said:

Obviously this was a private school unlike previous shootings but there is no logical reason our kids aren’t protected by armed men. Our politicians have armed security for a reason. While there are many genuinely sincere libs that believe gun control is the answer. The politicians and elites pushing gun control fully understand this had nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with control. The only freedoms libs support nowadays is that of criminals, abortion doctors , and homosexuals. Every other liberal policy is about control and robbing the American people of money and liberty. 

Succ alex jones GIF on GIFER - by Thorgann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

I don't believe that putting guns in schools solves anything. Say you have an armed security guard with a handgun. An attacker comes in with an AR-15, first target is the security guard. What exactly have you fixed?

Of course it’s not a fix but it’s better than nothing. This broad here even wrote that she had another site in mind but chose not to because it had increased security (whatever that was). Like Cals posted earlier, these suicidal people no longer just splatter their cortex on the garage ceiling but want the notoriety, fame and attention the media will give them when they shoot up the school. Someone is going to try it again so it makes sense to be ready for them and have someone there for, if anything, a quicker response. 

Edited by Jason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, arch stanton said:

Do you honestly think that whoever would take a job as an armed elementary school guard actually makes the school safer? Is the solution to win with firepower or to make more effort to prevent entry into the schools?

You don’t hire just “whoever” and yes, they should make entry to the schoolS more difficult. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jason said:

You don’t hire just “whoever” and yes, they should make entry to the schoolS more difficult. 

So just making it harder for a mental tranny to go buy 2 AR's in a weekend won't help?  The more these things happen, the more people scream they are coming to take our guns, when in reality it just becomes easier to get guns. Coming to take our guns is a top hit like woke and weaponization.  Tunes the snowflakes play not just on holidays but all year long. I just went through a pretty thorough background check and I was only getting a trade license with the state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crampknees said:

So just making it harder for a mental tranny to go buy 2 AR's in a weekend won't help?  The more these things happen, the more people scream they are coming to take our guns, when in reality it just becomes easier to get guns. Coming to take our guns is a top hit like woke and weaponization.  Tunes the snowflakes play not just on holidays but all year long. I just went through a pretty thorough background check and I was only getting a trade license with the state. 

No it wouldn’t have. I’m of the opinion we keep our violent criminals (who commit most of our gun violence) locked up. We have all the laws you guys dream of here in California and still have the same violence. Whether they choose a rifle, handgun or shotgun they can still accomplish their goal if the target they choose has no defense. This chick was in that school for 14 minutes until the dudes with guns showed up and smoked her. Thankfully these events are still pretty rare but sadly, we have to be prepared for them because we have deep, underlying issues our society needs to fix 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kotchman said:

Obviously this was a private school unlike previous shootings but there is no logical reason our kids aren’t protected by armed men. Our politicians have armed security for a reason. While there are many genuinely sincere libs that believe gun control is the answer. The politicians and elites pushing gun control fully understand this had nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with control. The only freedoms libs support nowadays is that of criminals, abortion doctors , and homosexuals. Every other liberal policy is about control and robbing the American people of money and liberty. 

You need to stick to the subjects you know best and those are blacks and/or gays. Speaking of which do you not keep up with current events?  Lets start with "Don't say Gay," you need to limit all the talk about dick and your longing for some. Just be strong and don't say gay anymore. On to black people, you seem to think you are some authority on them. Your ramblings about someone's ethnicity are making me feel guilty of something and I don't want your CRT.  From here on out any post you make will be removed from this library.  In summary, STFU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jason said:

No it wouldn’t have. I’m of the opinion we keep our violent criminals (who commit most of our gun violence) locked up. We have all the laws you guys dream of here in California and still have the same violence. Whether they choose a rifle, handgun or shotgun they can still accomplish their goal if the target they choose has no defense. This chick was in that school for 14 minutes until the dudes with guns showed up and smoked her. Thankfully these events are still pretty rare but sadly, we have to be prepared for them because we have deep, underlying issues our society needs to fix 

Right, got it.  Get rid of side doors then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, arch stanton said:

Do you honestly think that whoever would take a job as an armed elementary school guard actually makes the school safer? Is the solution to win with firepower or to make more effort to prevent entry into the schools?

80A6596D-1A1E-4434-A4CD-590C6D191E77.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jason said:

No it wouldn’t have. I’m of the opinion we keep our violent criminals (who commit most of our gun violence) locked up. We have all the laws you guys dream of here in California and still have the same violence. Whether they choose a rifle, handgun or shotgun they can still accomplish their goal if the target they choose has no defense. This chick was in that school for 14 minutes until the dudes with guns showed up and smoked her. Thankfully these events are still pretty rare but sadly, we have to be prepared for them because we have deep, underlying issues our society needs to fix 

See Jason, there is one thing here you are forgetting:  you are a moron, so your opinions are very, very stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cals said:

See Jason, there is one thing here you are forgetting:  you are a moron, so your opinions are very, very stupid.

Let’s be honest. Remove the cities from our Americas homicide discussion and America is as safe as any ball licking European nation. In all actuality it’s probably safer. Now who’s in charge and who is committing the majority of the murders ? Disarming my pops ain’t the answer to solving mass school shootings and violence in America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

Let’s be honest. Remove the cities from our Americas homicide discussion and America is as safe as any ball licking European nation. In all actuality it’s probably safer. Now who’s in charge and who is committing the majority of the murders ? Disarming my pops ain’t the answer to solving mass school shootings and violence in America. 

Which European countries lick balls? Just curious. Oh, and have you ever witnessed or been a part of said ball-licking? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the libs were saying as late as Jan 23 covid was the leading killer of kids and now miraculously guns are the leading cause of death among kids. Obviously they redefine children each time to support their narrative.  This is just another example of the dishonesty present in every liberal narrative. Yes we need to reduce death rates in children. There has to be honesty and transparency to solve problems.  They now admit kids don’t need the vaccine. This is something we all knew from day 1. Also, Admit blacks are major factor in gun deaths. Admit the gay ideology they’re pushing is a significant factor in suicide gun deaths. Admit sex is a very simple definition and stop mutilating kids. Now I can admit guns are involved in every shooting and  a honest discussion on  the overall health of our kids is the attainable. Of course we all know healthy and safe kids was never the liberal objective 

Edited by Kotchman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WicketMaiden said:

Which European countries lick balls? Just curious. Oh, and have you ever witnessed or been a part of said ball-licking? Thanks.

All of them. Those fuckers  went from world powers to sucking every super power country’s nuts yet libs look to them for guidance. Yes I’ve had my balls licked. Ask blarg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

So the libs were saying as late as Jan 23 covid was the leading killer of kids and now miraculously guns are the leading cause of death among kids. Obviously they redefine children each time to support their narrative.  This is just another example of the dishonesty present in every liberal narrative. Yes we need to reduce death rates in children. There has to be honesty and transparency to solve problems.  They now admit kids don’t need the vaccine. This is something we all knew from day 1. Also, Admit blacks are major factor in gun deaths. Admit the gay ideology they’re pushing is a significant factor in suicide gun deaths. Admit sex is a very simple definition and stop mutilating kids. Now I can admit guns are involved in every shooting and  a honest discussion on  the overall health of our kids is the attainable. Of course we all know healthy and safe kids was never the liberal objective 

They include 16-19 year olds inner city violence in the kids death statistics. That’s why it is inflated. They want you to think your average white children are getting mommy and daddy’s guns and shooting each other. The bigger issue with our kids is social media. When most of us were raised we obtained meaning of life and validation through our success in school, work and family, not the internet. Now that validation come through views, likes and clicks. When someone shoots children in a school they receive that validation they are seeking. It seems being raised by the internet isn’t the best thing. Inner city violence is a whole different issue 

Edited by Jason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jason said:

They include 16-19 year olds inner city violence in the kids death statistics. That’s why it is inflated. They want you to think your average white children are getting mommy and daddy’s guns and shooting each other. The bigger issue with our kids is social media. When most of us were raised we obtained meaning of life and validation through our success in school, work and family, not the internet. Now that validation come through views, likes and clicks. When someone shoots children in a school they receive that validation they are seeking. It seems being raised by the internet isn’t the best thing. Inner city violence is a whole different issue 

Social media is a big problem but it can’t realistically be eliminated. Thus, parents have to use leadership and help kids navigate the modern world. Traditional Parenting is the answer to most of our problems yet libs have waged war against it. Just another example of  dishonesty and ignorance that define most liberal ideology. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, arch stanton said:

Do you honestly think that whoever would take a job as an armed elementary school guard actually makes the school safer? Is the solution to win with firepower or to make more effort to prevent entry into the schools?

The only issue with that is that the entry door in the Nashville shooting was secured. The guy with the AR-15 shot the door open.

Again. it's the guns, or access to them that is far too easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...