Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

$18m Batting Practice Pitcher


nate

Recommended Posts

I understand a lot of your points.  As far as Lackey being an asshole:

  • showing up players in the field by giving the sighs or rolling eyes when they made errors
  • yelling at scioscia for pulling him in the playoff game
  • complaining about the anaheim fans after signing with boston
  • he signed with the Red Sox

 

My point is, even though our fans (me included) are as petulant as almost any other group, I don't think people got on Lackey for taking more money.

 

Just my opinion.

 

Good post, Lackey like any player should take the money.  His passion for success is why he still is a bull dog on the mound.  could you imagine if Ervin Santana had that type of passion, he would have been an ACE with his stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean Tommy Hanson? He was awful, but at least he had a positive WAR that year, as bad as he was. Blanton had a -0.5 WAR that year.

 

We had pitchers in the minor leagues who could have easily produced better than that.

 

Yes, Tommy Hanson.    and Yes we had pitchers in the Minors but we had Dipotto and it was his job to provide the pitching options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand a lot of your points.  As far as Lackey being an asshole:

  • showing up players in the field by giving the sighs or rolling eyes when they made errors
  • yelling at scioscia for pulling him in the playoff game
  • complaining about the anaheim fans after signing with boston
  • he signed with the Red Sox

 

My point is, even though our fans (me included) are as petulant as almost any other group, I don't think people got on Lackey for taking more money.

 

Just my opinion.

 

Agree.

 

The Angels did not want to re-sign Lackey for the amount of money he was seeking.  If I recall correctly the fans here were pretty much on board with that decision.

 

The problem came when he signed with the Red Sox and then badmouthed Angels fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand a lot of your points. As far as Lackey being an asshole:

  • showing up players in the field by giving the sighs or rolling eyes when they made errors
  • yelling at scioscia for pulling him in the playoff game
  • complaining about the anaheim fans after signing with boston
  • he signed with the Red Sox

My point is, even though our fans (me included) are as petulant as almost any other group, I don't think people got on Lackey for taking more money.

Just my opinion.

fair points yk. I think his attitude when being pulled is similar to weaver though, and a lot of other big name pitchers. If lackey had stayed here i dont think the label on him would have been the same though. And the comments about angel fans, yeah, it sucks to hear, but in all fairness its pretty true. Angel stadium is pretty mild compared to a place like fenway.

But i agree, you shouldnt say it. I cringed when we signed hamilton and he said the same about texas. Just say "im excited to be here"...no need to talk about yesterday.

Personally as far as lackey, i think he was pretty much a scapegoat to the boston media. The sux were bad at the time, he was the new big contract. The chicken and beer thing comes up, and its a "big deal". But when the sux were winning nobody in boston cared about his diet. Same as when manny was being manny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Literally anyone could have done better than Joe Blanton that year.

Easy to say that. I can essily say i can dunk on Lavron James ad well. Who did the Angels have?

Of I am not mistaken Sosh had the choice of Barry Enright or Buddy Boshers. Your right Sosh had a lot of options.

As you guys continue to bash Sosh favoring vets keep in mind that in 2010 he moved veteran Torii Hunter to RF and benched veteran Juan Rivera for a rookie named Peter Bourjos. In 2011 another rookie started by the name Mark Trumbo. In 2012 he benched veteran Bobby Abreu for a rookie named Mike Trout.

Scioscia plays the players he believes (not you or I) that would put the team in the best position to win. When there has been a clear better younger alternative he used them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why you're putting so much into this.

I said Blanton was left in the rotation too long. He was. You don't need 21 starts to figure out how terrible he was.

I said we had minor league pitchers who could have pitched better. They could have.

It's not hard to out produce a 6.04 ERA and a -0.5 WAR.

Shoemaker, Enright, Boshers, Buckner, Roth. Literally anyone. I'm not saying these guys are good pitchers, but I am saying Blanton was so bad that a minor league pitcher would have been a better option compared to him that year. Why even argue that? Blanton was probably the worst starter in baseball in 2013.

Is Dipoto to blame for the signing? Absolutely. But Scioscia left Blanton in the rotation too long.

We tried Enright and Bosses and they sucked just as bad. There is an argument for Shoemaker and Roth got shelled everytime he faced major league pitching. If your going to throw a shitty pitcher out there at least go with one that had at least a little success in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why you're putting so much into this.

I said Blanton was left in the rotation too long. He was. You don't need 21 starts to figure out how terrible he was.

I said we had minor league pitchers who could have pitched better. They could have.

It's not hard to out produce a 6.04 ERA and a -0.5 WAR.

Shoemaker, Enright, Boshers, Buckner, Roth. Literally anyone. I'm not saying these guys are good pitchers, but I am saying Blanton was so bad that a minor league pitcher would have been a better option compared to him that year. Why even argue that? Blanton was probably the worst starter in baseball in 2013.

Is Dipoto to blame for the signing? Absolutely. But Scioscia left Blanton in the rotation too long.

Scioscia does not choose the 25 man roster. Dipoto is the only one who could pull Blanton and give Scioscia an alternate 5th starter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is Dipoto to blame for the signing? Absolutely. But Scioscia left Blanton in the rotation too long.

 

Yep, and Dipoto had no say in that at all ..  It wasn't his experiment in FIP gone wrong at stake, he wasn't the guy that gave him 15 mil to be awful...  It was all MS being stubborn.   

Edited by Inside Pitch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought is, we had nothing to lose. Blanton was that bad that it was worth the risk of trying someone else, regardless of their little success. What's the worst that could happen? We lose by more than we would have lost with Blanton starting? That would have been near impossible to do.

It's on Dipoto too. Like notti said, Dipoto didn't pull Blanton and call someone else up quick enough, but Scioscia seemed to be the main guy in control of the Angels at that time anyway, which is why Dipoto left. It falls on both of them since they were supposed to work together.

Blanton absolutely did take starts away from Richards though.

Was Scioscia the main guy in control when the Angels fired Hatcher that same season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's real simple, Dipoto signed Blanton to a two year 15M dollar deal. The guy stunk but the manager (and I don't care who that is) isn't going to take him out of the rotation after 8 or 10 starts. You don't pay a guy 15 million to sit on the bench especially if there isn't a suitable replacement (and in this case there wasn't one)..that's just the way it is. Can anyone imagine the conversation between Scioscia and Dipoto if Scioscia had benched Blanton after say 10 starts? Dipoto would have been down there asking why his guy that he just signed for 15m isn't playing?  Scioscia would have said "hey the guy stinks" and Dipoto would have said "I just gave the guy 15m 10 weeks ago so give him time to work it out".

 

Blanton no doubt stunk but blaming Scioscia for his stench is just more of the same blame Scioscia for everything baloney imo. ymmv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's real simple, Dipoto signed Blanton to a two year 15M dollar deal. The guy stunk but the manager (and I don't care who that is) isn't going to take him out of the rotation after 8 or 10 starts. You don't pay a guy 15 million to sit on the bench especially if there isn't a suitable replacement (and in this case there wasn't one)..that's just the way it is. Can anyone imagine the conversation between Scioscia and Dipoto if Scioscia had benched Blanton after say 10 starts? Dipoto would have been down there asking why his guy that he just signed for 15m isn't playing? Scioscia would have said "hey the guy stinks" and Dipoto would have said "I just gave the guy 15m 10 weeks ago so give him time to work it out".

Blanton no doubt stunk but blaming Scioscia for his stench is just more of the same blame Scioscia for everything baloney imo. ymmv

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...