Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Gameday Thread: Red Sox @ Angels (7/5/21): Suarez on the mound, Rojas in RF, Gosselin in LF & clean-up


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thebloob said:

I guess I’m not sure what you think their job is if not to get the calls right?

There was no conclusive evidence I saw that he tagged his shoulder. It has to be clear and conclusive evidence to overturn a call. I don’t think we had that there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bronson said:

There was no conclusive evidence I saw that he tagged his shoulder. It has to be clear and conclusive evidence to overturn a call. I don’t think we had that there.

Well, some of us here think it was conclusive, and clearly the folks in NY did.

No one will ever be happy with umpires' calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cals said:

Don’t be a jackass.  They have a job.  It’s to determine if there is enough visual evidence to overturn the call on the field based on clear and convincing evidence.  I’m watching the game on a 15 foot screen and I don’t know if he was tagged.  He may have avoided it.  The catcher reached back again which is a huge sign he didn’t feel a tag.  The point is that they tend to apply a “what would I have called had I been there” standard.  That isn’t the rule.  The call should have been upheld.  Had he been called out on the play then it also should have been upheld.

I'm not being a jackass.  You're the one ranting and raving, as usual.  It looked clear to me, and obviously did to them, too.  And the catcher reaching back doesn't tell you anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cals said:

You never played this game, did you? You’re taught not to reach back even if you missed the tag unless you know for sure you can get it.  It was the reach back that caused the safe call in the first place, more than likely.

Ah, the typical fallback of dumbfuck jocks whenever anyone disagrees with them.  Yes, I played.

Muting you now.  Should have done so a long time ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cals said:

Aren’t you the one who is afraid to meet anyone from here?  

Lol.  Saw this right as I was muting you.  I'm not "afraid" to meet anyone from here, nor am I embarrassed by anything.  I just don't see the need to meet anyone from a message board in real life.  Not my thing these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...