Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Jarrod Saltalamacchia available


Recommended Posts

and in the last 6 seasons, Salty has hit over .235 once

.220 last year

 

here's iannetta over those same last 6 seasons:

.197

.238

.240

.225

.252

and .094 so far this year

 

it doesn't make a compelling argument to go out and pick up salty, nor does it give us a compelling reason to keep playing iannetta.

 

we need a catcher that can hit and field well. maybe this new kid will have something better to offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's another thing that baffles me about catchers and how they hit: they look at pitching from the best angle constantly. they know how the ball is going to move, and they should have a huge advantage on what pitch is coming next. why are so many of them such crappy hitters? they have advantages that other players don't have, yet do so little with those advantages. why is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's another thing that baffles me about catchers and how they hit: they look at pitching from the best angle constantly. they know how the ball is going to move, and they should have a huge advantage on what pitch is coming next. why are so many of them such crappy hitters? they have advantages that other players don't have, yet do so little with those advantages. why is that?

 

Because their catching skills are valued more than their hitting skills. Guys who can't hit can still make it into the majors if they can catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because their catching skills are valued more than their hitting skills. Guys who can't hit can still make it into the majors if they can catch.

My question is more about pitch recognition while they're at bat. They're in a unique position all game long to see what pitches look like and what pitches might come in certain situations. given these advantages, why aren't they better at hitting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is more about pitch recognition while they're at bat. They're in a unique position all game long to see what pitches look like and what pitches might come in certain situations. given these advantages, why aren't they better at hitting?

Pitchers aren't jnown for their hitting abilities either. Could be because they are scouted and signed for their ability to play the position, with less regard for other aspects of their overalll game compared to other players. Byproduct of a talent pool concerning limited skill sets?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I UNDERSTAND THAT CATCHERS ARE PICKED FOR THEIR CATCHING ABILITIES!

But that's not what I'm asking.

Pitchers are also in a unique position to see a lot of pitches, and they are well aware of the stike zone, and have a familiarity with the umpire and how the strike zone is being called. Doesn?t seem to help them much at the plate either.

Maybe it is the limited skillz setz.

Anxiously awaiting your next text size...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitchers are also in a unique position to see a lot of pitches, and they are well aware of the stike zone, and have a familiarity with the umpire and how the strike zone is being called. Doesn?t seem to help them much at the plate either.

Maybe it is the limited skillz setz.

Anxiously awaiting your next text size...

yeah, but batters aren't expected to hit the ball as it travels away from them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitchers aren't jnown for their hitting abilities either. Could be because they are scouted and signed for their ability to play the position, with less regard for other aspects of their overalll game compared to other players. Byproduct of a talent pool concerning limited skill sets?

 

A lot of it has to do with the amount of time they spend working on it. When the Atlanta Braves had an all-world rotation in the 1990s, their pitchers spent a lot of time in the batting cage. They were all decent hitters (at least for pitchers). Bobby Cox occasionally used Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine as pinch hitters for some of the relief pitchers in games in which the bench had been exhausted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THATS NOT WHAT TANK WAS ASKING.

But, yeah.

It's because pitch recognition isn't as important as the physical tools to hit. Otherwise they would spend more time in the video room than the batting cage.

Same reason a catcher who has caught a certain pitcher isn't necessarily good at hitting him.

Catchers get physically beaten up a lot, which makes it tough to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...