Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Should have traded for another starter...


Recommended Posts

Cubs will want a large package.

Of prospects.

if we're smart, we'll screw them with a small package..

Ive been saying Lee since last season. Hes the only guy I can think of who we can get cheap prospect wise because hes expensive and his team doesnt need him (philly sucks).

I still say watching lee, hamilton, pujols, cj and freese win a world series would be the winning ingredients to the most epic stamm youtube video in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, it would be marvelous to have Price.  You can never have too much starting pitching.  As you know, it's not that easy.

 

To get Price, the Ray's would of probably asked for Richards, Cron, and another prospect or draft pick.  I don't believe they would of accepted the bullpen pieces (although they are good talent) and Cron.   They might have accepted a package of Calhoun, Green, Bedrosian, and Skaggs, but I don't make that deal if I'm Dipoto.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fair argument against the Street trade.  That package wouldn't have gotten David Price... and I doubt the Angels could've assembled a package to get David Price...  without trading someone important to the club right now (Calhoun) or in the future (Skaggs)... but starting pitchers make a bigger difference, and the rotation has some issues.   They aren't left with much to trade now,   Any starting pitcher they acquire will likely  be as questionable as the group they have.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, here is the crux of the subject.

How much more does an extra middle of the rotation starter benefit the team than having a lockdown back end of the bullpen?

I still think those 4 players for Street and Gott was too much to give up.

But admittedly I have softened a little on the extent of how much so. Rondon is the one that really hurts to see traded away, and of course Alvarez.

We have seen a strong bullpen overcome a decent at best rotation for the 2002 Halos, 2007 Red Sox, 2008 Phillies, and 2013 Red Sox, as they won a WS title.

We have also seen a strong rotation propel the 2001 D-Backs and 2003 Marlins to the WS title.

We saw both a strong rotation and strong pen of course propel the 2005 ChiSox and 2010 Giants to the WS title.

It does seem that a strong back end of the pen is just about a prerequisite to win a WS title. Very few if any teams since 2000 have won a WS title with having just at best a decent to solid pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rays are hot right now, winning 15/20. They may not be willing to give up Price now. 

 

I never thought I'd say this, but the AL East is so mediocre that 87 wins could win it in 2014.   The Rays are not out of it by any stretch.

 

^^^^^AO, I thought you were on Self Ban?????

 

 

Don't mess with the Streak.....Disappear!

 

 

 

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

 

LOL, they have gone 2-1 since I returned.    Maybe the return set the stage for BowandArrowGate?

And anyway, self-bans are stupid; as well as that abomination of a thread I started yesterday, feel free to send it to the HOF section.    It was nice to partially avenge the season opening sweep, to be sure (5-4 against M's since that sweep).

Now, they have one remaining team to right the ship against: Oakland (currently 3-6 against). 

Edited by Angel Oracle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something else to consider is this: Although the Angels most certainly overpaid they have set a price for all other teams wanting to move their closers in trade making it difficult for teams in need of a high-end reliever acquiring them on the cheap.

Certainly some will still move (and possibly for a cheaper price) based on their quality level and remaining contract but the Angels (and the A's with starting pitching rentals for that matter) have set the bar high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the Phillies want Cron?

 

They wouldn't.  I think they'd want salary relief for sure, but no one just gives away a Cliff Lee caliber pitcher for nothing.  Angels would need to part ways with more prospects in a trade that would likely make the Street trade's dagger feel like a scratch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree on Moreno having the bucks (if truly not concerned with the luxury tax). 

But how effective can Lee be, since he turns 36 next month and hasn't pitched in the AL in some 4 years?

Plus his WHIP in 68 innings so far is 1.28, pretty high for the NL. 

He's giving up more hits per innings pitched than in any season since 2009.

 

With his 2014 peripheral stats so far (taking NL vs. AL into consideration), he's really not that much better than Skaggs, Santiago, or Shoemaker.

He has the experience they don't have, but otherwise it's seemingly a wash.

Edited by Angel Oracle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With his 2014 peripheral stats so far (taking NL vs. AL into consideration), he's really not that much better than Skaggs, Santiago, or Shoemaker.

He has the experience they don't have, but otherwise it's seemingly a wash.

Hilarious.

That's ridiculous, even for you.

Edited by Angels
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, looking beyond his 1.28 WHIP so far then, is his low 3.18 ERA so far in 2014 a reflection of pitching in the NL, or is he really good at stranding runners so far?   

 

The WHIPs of Santiago (1.31), Skaggs (1.26), and Shoemaker (1.34) are all comparable to Lee's so far in 2014.  

 

Lee's control is still rock solid (9 BBs in 68 innings), his GB/FB ratio is still around 50/50, and he keeps the ball in the park (5 HRs in 68 innings).

But is he now very hittable with the 78 hits allowed and just 61 K's in 68 innings?

 

Remember that we benefit not from what Lee has done in the past, aside from the experience factor, but from what he may do from August 2014 forward.  

Are his stats so far in 2014 indicative of a permanent decline having started already?

Or is he capable of solid pitching for 2 more seasons?

Edited by Angel Oracle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...