Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

26 wins


Docwaukee

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Angelsjunky said:

There are three areas, or at least three controllable areas (not counting luck/fate):

Health: I know, not fully controllable, but it isn't entirely outside of control, either. Trout needs to get on the phone with Novak Djokovic and find out some yoga moves and perhaps whatever alchemical concoctions Novak is drinking. Add in Rendon and Ward and the Angels got 222 games from those three, or an average of 74 games. That needs to improve, and almost certainly will. 222 games of Trout-Rendon-Ward yielded 4.7 WAR. With positive regression from all three and more games played, even just 350 games could give them 10+ WAR. The Angels were beyond even the worst-case reasonable scenario last year, so even if they still have injury issues in 2024, chances are it won't be nearly as bad. Meaning, they gain an easy 5 wins just through not having the worst injury-plagued season of all time, but the range starts there and could be +5 to 15 wins.

Player Development: Here's the good news: A larger number of Angels players are on the ascending arc: Neto, O'Hoppe, Schanuel, Moniak, Adell, Silseth, Detmers, even still Rengifo and Canning. Chances are there is overall improvement from this group. So again, a baseline +5 wins but with range being something like +5-10 wins.

Player Acquisitions: Many focus on this, and while it is obviously important, it is just one of three big areas of possible improvement - and I think probably less impactful than the other two. They need another starter or two and depth all around. +0-10 wins.

So a baseline of +10 wins from better health (it really can't be that bad again) and modest player development. But that is negated by the loss of Ohtani. 

So by my account, that's +10-30ish games...quite a range. Take away Ohtani and, at worst, they're around the same place, in the 70-75 win range. At best and they can win 90+, but...this is where luck/fate comes in, and the simple fact that they need someone to step forward and have a breakout/comeback year - and probably several players. Meaning, they really need Trout to return to being vaguely Trout-esque. They need one of Ward or Rendon to return to a better form of themselves and stay healthy. They need two or three of the young guys to grow up fast and be impact players. They need one or two of Sandoval, Detmers, Canning and Silseth to do more than be an erratic #3-4 and solidify as a strong #2. And they need some help from the outside.

aaaaaand....

tinkerbell GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, is going by WAR truly a good way to predict how many games we will win?

 

The Angels had 27.5 WAR as a team in 2023 and they won, as you said 73 games.

The Orioles for example, had 41.3 WAR as a team, and they won 101 games. So the difference of 14 WAR resulted in 28 more wins.

I don't think we need as much as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

First off, is going by WAR truly a good way to predict how many games we will win?

 

The Angels had 27.5 WAR as a team in 2023 and they won, as you said 73 games.

The Orioles for example, had 41.3 WAR as a team, and they won 101 games. So the difference of 14 WAR resulted in 28 more wins.

I don't think we need as much as you think.

It is a short-hand estimate. And really, the above implies that the Orioles over-achieved and are probably more of a 85-90 win team with their current roster (their Pythagorean record had them at 94-68). There's always some flex, but WAR gives a baseline of expected performance (and I believe it is 45 wins + WAR = expected record, or something like that...so it predicted the Angels quite well).

Take the Philadelphia Eagles. I noticed a couple weeks ago when they were 10-1 that their point differential was rather low: they were winning most games by very close margins. Since then they've lost the last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

First off, is going by WAR truly a good way to predict how many games we will win?

 

The Angels had 27.5 WAR as a team in 2023 and they won, as you said 73 games.

The Orioles for example, had 41.3 WAR as a team, and they won 101 games. So the difference of 14 WAR resulted in 28 more wins.

I don't think we need as much as you think.

agreed.  my estimate is just back of the napkin.  the team was bad and they lost their best player.  In the real world, timing matters.  WAR tries to neutralize that.  

but...the Angels and Bmore had similar WAR from their starting staff.  That 14 war difference came from offense (primarily in the second half), and the bullpen.  In fact half of it came from the pen.  

Texas is an interesting example.  They outslugged their pen deficiencies.   Typically, you can't be god awful in any one particular category unless you're absolutely lights out in another.  

The 73 wins from the halos last year is skewed because of the meltdown in the final two months.  

While they deserved to be that bad, I think they're starting point for 2024 is better than a 73 win team even without Ohtani.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CaliAngel said:

I think "hoping for health" should be immediately thrown out, because as we've seen this past decade, it just can't be relied on in this organization. 

Last year we were somewhere around the top in MLB of paying for players who weren't actually playing due to injuries. 

If that's the case then the Angels have no chance, so might as well throw out all hope. They cannot possibly add the players they would need to make up for an average of 72 games from Trout, Rendon, and Ward (those three especially) - especially Trout. 

And it isn't about relying on it, but pointing out that without improved health, there's little chance of competing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Angelsjunky said:

There are three areas, or at least three controllable areas (not counting luck/fate):

Health: I know, not fully controllable, but it isn't entirely outside of control, either. Trout needs to get on the phone with Novak Djokovic and find out some yoga moves and perhaps whatever alchemical concoctions Novak is drinking. Add in Rendon and Ward and the Angels got 222 games from those three, or an average of 74 games. That needs to improve, and almost certainly will. 222 games of Trout-Rendon-Ward yielded 4.7 WAR. With positive regression from all three and more games played, even just 350 games could give them 10+ WAR. The Angels were beyond even the worst-case reasonable scenario last year, so even if they still have injury issues in 2024, chances are it won't be nearly as bad. Meaning, they gain an easy 5 wins just through not having the worst injury-plagued season of all time, but the range starts there and could be +5 to 15 wins.

Player Development: Here's the good news: A larger number of Angels players are on the ascending arc: Neto, O'Hoppe, Schanuel, Moniak, Adell, Silseth, Detmers, even still Rengifo and Canning. Chances are there is overall improvement from this group. So again, a baseline +5 wins but with range being something like +5-10 wins.

Player Acquisitions: Many focus on this, and while it is obviously important, it is just one of three big areas of possible improvement - and I think probably less impactful than the other two. They need another starter or two and depth all around. +0-10 wins.

So a baseline of +10 wins from better health (it really can't be that bad again) and modest player development. But that is negated by the loss of Ohtani. 

So by my account, that's +10-30ish games...quite a range. Take away Ohtani and, at worst, they're around the same place, in the 70-75 win range. At best and they can win 90+, but...this is where luck/fate comes in, and the simple fact that they need someone to step forward and have a breakout/comeback year - and probably several players. Meaning, they really need Trout to return to being vaguely Trout-esque. They need one of Ward or Rendon to return to a better form of themselves and stay healthy. They need two or three of the young guys to grow up fast and be impact players. They need one or two of Sandoval, Detmers, Canning and Silseth to do more than be an erratic #3-4 and solidify as a strong #2. And they need some help from the outside.

 

 

Also add in the addition of what should be a Washington led coaching staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better/smarter in game management/coaching can be a difference maker for close games. 

Adell finally emerging as a solid power hitter. Trout and Rendon rebounding closer to their career norm. And at least being healthy. 

Continued progress by Neto, Schamuel, O'Hoppe and any upgrades via trade/free agency. 

A steady five man rotation that collectively stay in sync and improve individually  with a better pitching coach and philosophy. And a bullpen with defined roles that can be at least at league average. 

The freedom from the Ohtani soap opera and a better team focus. There will be no national spotlight on the team. And this let's them just go about their business without distractions.

Overall health has to improve. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

First off, is going by WAR truly a good way to predict how many games we will win?

 

The Angels had 27.5 WAR as a team in 2023 and they won, as you said 73 games.

The Orioles for example, had 41.3 WAR as a team, and they won 101 games. So the difference of 14 WAR resulted in 28 more wins.

I don't think we need as much as you think.

Star Wars Disney Plus GIF by Disney+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Docwaukee said:

While they deserved to be that bad, I think they're starting point for 2024 is better than a 73 win team even without Ohtani.  

you're a heck of a lot more optomistic than me in a pollyanna kind of way. 

i'd be impressed and amazed if they reached 73 wins next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CaliAngel said:

I think "hoping for health" should be immediately thrown out, because as we've seen this past decade, it just can't be relied on in this organization. 

Last year we were somewhere around the top in MLB of paying for players who weren't actually playing due to injuries. 

Regardless, no matter who we sign in free agency, if we don’t have health we are not going anywhere.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...